Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2008Did Not Pass

SF0077

Wyoming Severance Tax Distribution Proposal

Last scannedOct 18, 2026, 2:19 AM

In one sentence

This bill proposed changing how excess severance tax revenue is distributed among state funds and removing a specific road construction appropriation, but it did not pass.

What it does

  • Proposes changing the distribution of severance tax revenue that exceeds $155 million in a fiscal year.
  • Proposes distributing the excess revenue equally among the general fund, the budget reserve account, and the highway fund for a specific period.
  • Proposes that a specific 2008 appropriation for road construction in the Department of Transportation budget would not be effective.
  • Sets the effective date of the act to July 1, 2008.

Who it affects

  • The Wyoming state government agencies that manage the general fund, budget reserve account, and highway fund.
  • The Department of Transportation, which would lose a specific road construction funding allocation.

Limits and unknowns

  • The bill did not pass and did not become law.
  • The official bill text provided is labeled as a 'Working Draft,' so the final details may have differed from this version.
  • The bill does not explain why the road construction appropriation was being removed.

Plain language

Terms to know

Severance tax
A tax on the extraction of natural resources, such as oil, gas, or minerals.
General fund
The main pool of money used to pay for most state government services.
Budget reserve account
A savings account for the state government to use during financial shortfalls or emergencies.
Highway fund
A specific fund used to pay for road and highway maintenance and construction.

Official record

Sources

Source checked

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 8, 11:40 PM

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because it provides necessary funding for highway maintenance without requiring a fuel tax increase, which they oppose.

Public statementFloor statement at 27:54 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because it provides stability and priority funding for highway construction, which they view as a critical responsibility given rising costs and limited alternative revenue sources.

Public statementFloor statement at 28:58 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker is reconsidering their support because extending the earmark to 2018 creates a false guarantee of funding that cannot be promised so far into the future.

Public statementFloor statement at 31:07 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because extending the earmark through 2018 removes legislative oversight and forces a policy decision about fund allocation too far into an uncertain future.

Public statementFloor statement at 32:44 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill as a necessary alternative to raising fuel taxes, arguing it provides needed planning stability for highway funding despite revenue uncertainties.

Public statementFloor statement at 35:54 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker urges rejection of the bill because re-establishing earmarks removes legislative control over future budgets and repeats a painful historical mistake.

Public statementFloor statement at 39:13 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker explains that diverting severance tax revenue from the budget reserve to the highway fund will provide long-term planning stability for road construction and maintenance, addressing current struggles with rising costs.

Public statementFloor statement at 15:42 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

4 roll calls

S Failed 3rd 15-14-1; Failed Reconsider 10-19-1-0-02008-02-25 · Senate10 yes 19 no
S Failed Reading 15-14-1-0-02008-02-25 · Senate15 yes 14 no
S03 Recommended Do Pass 4-1-0-0-02008-02-20 · Senate4 yes 1 no
S Introduced and Referred to S03 21-9-0-0-02008-02-14 · Senate21 yes 9 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. S Failed 3rd 15-14-1; Failed ReconsiderSenate
  2. S Failed ReadingSenate
  3. S Passed 2nd ReadingSenate
  4. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  5. S Amendments AdoptedSenate
  6. S Passed CoWSenate
  7. Amendment FailedSenate
  8. Amendment FailedSenate
  9. S Placed on General FileSenate
  10. S03 Recommended Do PassSenate
  11. S Introduced and Referred to S03Senate
  12. S Received for IntroductionSenate
  13. Bill Number AssignedLSO

Changes

Amendments

3 stored

SF0077S2001

Adopted 2nd reading by ANDERSON,J

SF0077SW001

Failed Committee of the Whole by MEIER

SF0077SS001

Failed Standing Committee by ANDERSON,J