Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because Senate amendments clarified that drug administration follows a prescription by a licensed psychiatrist rather than requiring the psychiatrist to personally administer every dose.
Criminal procedure-administration of antipsychotic drugs.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Bill No.: <billno> Drafter: <drafterinit> Bill No.: HB0020 Drafter: JHR LSO No.: 09LSO-0068 Effective Date: 7/1/2009 Enrolled Act No.: HEA0014 Chapter No.: 32 Prime Sponsor: Select Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Catch Title: Criminal procedure-administration of antipsychotic drugs. Subject: Provides standards for the involuntary administration of antipsychotic drugs to a mentally ill person accused of a serious crime. Summary/Major Elements: The Wyoming State Hospital often keeps mentally ill persons accused of a serious crime for extended periods of time because the accused person refuses to take antipsychotic medications that could render the person fit to stand trial. This bill authorizes a court to order the involuntary administration of antipsychotic medications to render an accused competent to stand trial if the court makes specified findings, including the administration of the medication: Will further the governmental interests of bringing the accused to trail for a timely prosecution and to assure a fair trial; Will substantially improve the likelihood that the accused will be competent to stand trial; Will be substantially unlikely to interfere with the accused's ability to assist counsel in conducting a defense at trial; May be as good, or better than, alternative and less intrusive treatments to achieve substantially the same results. The bill also requires that the antipsychotic drugs be administered pursuant to a prescription from a licensed psychiatrist and the medications be medically appropriate and in the best interests of the accused in light of his medical condition.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 8:45 AM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because Senate amendments clarified that drug administration follows a prescription by a licensed psychiatrist rather than requiring the psychiatrist to personally administer every dose.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill due to concerns about privacy and constitutional issues, noting that psychiatry is more of an art than a science. They fear the process could lead to forced medication without adequate safeguards for personal rights.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because medicating incompetent individuals allows them to regain competency and proceed with their legal cases, potentially leading to release from commitment.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
5 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
2 stored
Adopted 2nd reading by DECARIA
Adopted Standing Committee by ROSS