Wyoming Workforce Housing Program Changes
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 11, 6:32 PM
H05
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to remove funding because times are tough and a million dollars is significant, suggesting resources should be redirected to other projects after more discussion.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because it represents an attempt to shift responsibilities from private enterprise to government obligation, which he views as creeping incrementalism without a valid basis.
H15
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because there is no affordable housing or rentals in boom counties, forcing workers into expensive man camps and causing turnover among essential staff like correctional officers.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to remove funding because he believes it is not the proper role for government, noting that existing loan programs have seen no applications and rules are still being written.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because he believes the private market naturally resolves housing shortages through a cycle of motels, trailers, and home purchases without government intervention.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill as a necessary infrastructure investment to help families who cannot currently buy homes due to credit issues, allowing them to rent and bring their families to Wyoming.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill and opposes the amendment, arguing that government must support infrastructure for workforce housing to ensure communities remain livable and attract workers.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it includes planning components for small communities and distinguishes between private entities and political subdivisions, ensuring money is used for public good rather than just profit.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill as an economic development tool to prevent $2.5 million from leaving the state daily due to workers living in man camps instead of local housing.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes adding extra funding to the bill because $1 million already available is sufficient for planning, and there are other priorities that need money.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
6 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
8 stored
Adopted 2nd reading by PHILP
Adopted 3rd reading by PEDERSEN
Withdrawn 3rd reading by PEDERSEN
Adopted Standing Committee by H09
Adopted Standing Committee by H02
Failed 2nd reading by VON FLATER
Adopted 2nd reading by LARSON
Adopted Standing Committee by LARSON