Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2010Did Not Pass

HB0037

Mandatory judicial retirement-2.

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

A plain-English summary is not available yet.

Who it affects

Not clearly identified in the stored source.

Limits and unknowns

No additional limitations are listed.

Official record

Sources

Source attached

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 8, 6:36 AM

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that the current mandatory retirement age of 70 constitutes improper age discrimination in the Constitution, asserting that judges can remain competent and wise well past that age.

Public statementFloor statement at 31:31 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports removing the mandatory retirement limit because many people over 70 are fully functional and their wisdom is a great advantage, though she expresses concern about having no age limit at all.

Public statementFloor statement at 33:26 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

4 roll calls

S01 Recommended Do Pass 4-1-0-0-02010-02-24 · Senate4 yes 1 no
H Passed 3rd Reading 52-5-3-0-02010-02-16 · House52 yes 5 no
H01 Recommended Amend and Do Pass 9-0-0-0-02010-02-10 · House9 yes 0 no
H Introduced and Referred to H01 48-10-2-0-02010-02-09 · House48 yes 10 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. S Placed on General File; Did not Consider in CoWSenate
  2. S01 Recommended Do PassSenate
  3. S Introduced and Referred to S01Senate
  4. S Received for IntroductionSenate
  5. H Passed 3rd ReadingHouse
  6. H Passed 2nd ReadingHouse
  7. H Passed CoWHouse
  8. H Amendments AdoptedHouse
  9. Amendment AdoptedHouse
  10. H Placed on General FileHouse
  11. H01 Recommended Amend and Do PassHouse
  12. H Introduced and Referred to H01House
  13. H Received for IntroductionHouse
  14. Bill Number AssignedLSO

Changes

Amendments

1 stored

HB0037HS001

Adopted Standing Committee by H01