Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that the current mandatory retirement age of 70 constitutes improper age discrimination in the Constitution, asserting that judges can remain competent and wise well past that age.
Mandatory judicial retirement-2.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 6:36 AM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that the current mandatory retirement age of 70 constitutes improper age discrimination in the Constitution, asserting that judges can remain competent and wise well past that age.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports removing the mandatory retirement limit because many people over 70 are fully functional and their wisdom is a great advantage, though she expresses concern about having no age limit at all.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
4 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
1 stored
Adopted Standing Committee by H01