NEPA and ESA review.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 6:36 AM
S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill to formally direct the Attorney General to investigate federal actions under NEPA and ESA that impact Wyoming's economic interests, including potential litigation for damages.
S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes passing the bill as written because it may restrict the Attorney General's strategic flexibility in choosing which lawsuits to pursue, potentially leading to adverse legal outcomes.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because it delegates litigation authority to an unelected Attorney General rather than keeping that decision-making power with the elected Governor who is accountable for such actions.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because it allows the Attorney General to access funding outside of the Governor's control, creating a dangerous independent budget for litigation that may not serve the public interest.
H50
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill as a method to utilize existing federal law to ensure agencies handling public lands involve states in their processes and listen to state concerns.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
5 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
2 stored
Adopted Standing Committee by H06
Adopted Standing Committee by BURNS