Plain language
Terms to know
- Sales tax exemption
- A rule that removes the state sales tax from the price of specific items, such as manufacturing machinery.
- Use tax exemption
- A rule that removes the state use tax from the cost of specific items used in the state, such as manufacturing machinery.
- NAICS code
- A standard code used to classify businesses by industry; this law applies to codes 31-33, which cover manufacturing.
- Tangible personal property
- Physical items that can be touched, such as goods produced by a factory.
Read the official summary
Bill No.: <billno> Drafter: <drafterinit>
Bill No.:
HB0049
Drafter:
MQ
LSO No.:
10LSO-0218
Effective Date:
3/4/2010
Enrolled Act No.:
HEA0014
Chapter No.:
33
Prime Sponsor:
Representative
Madden
Catch Title:
Manufacturing
sales & use tax exemption.
Subject:
Extends the sales/use tax exemption for
manufacturing equipment.
Summary/Major Elements:
Current sales/use tax
exemption granted for the sale or lease of machinery used in manufacturing
tangible personal property will expire on December 31, 2010.
Bill extends the expiration
date 1 year to December 31, 2011.
Public statements
Why lawmakers voted
Last checked Aug 8, 6:36 AM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that tax breaks are not a primary factor in corporate location decisions, which instead focus on markets and workforce, making the exemption an unnecessary giveaway of taxpayer money. He believes businesses invest to increase productivity rather than for one-time sales tax savings.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports extending the sunset date by one year to allow the Revenue Committee time to analyze four years of data and determine if modifications are needed before the exemption expires.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it helps maintain competitiveness with other states and has already led to major expansions and job creation in her community's manufacturing sector.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker votes for the bill because testimony from business owners indicates it is vital for keeping people employed during an economic recession when many are struggling.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports extending the exemption for one year to allow evaluation of its impact on the struggling soda ash industry in Southwest Wyoming, which is crucial to the state.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports passing the bill because expert testimony indicated that tax breaks do attract businesses and develop jobs, which brings in other revenue for the state.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker votes for the bill based on a philosophy that leaving money in the private sector allows businesses to grow, thereby broadening the tax base and increasing economic activity.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill and opposes the amendment due to concerns about high unemployment rates during a recession, implying that job loss is unacceptable for individuals or communities.
Why they voted this way
The speaker opposes the bill because it results in significant lost revenue for state and local governments, arguing that fiscal responsibility requires letting the exemption expire.
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the bill because it allows for a review that could reduce costs by limiting exemptions while still achieving necessary job expansion and economic development.