Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports concurrence because the bill contains technical corrections, including a name change for a historic site and an amendment contingent on another juvenile detention facility standards bill passing.
Revisor's bill.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Bill No.: <billno> Drafter: <drafterinit> Bill No.: HB0065 Drafter: JWL LSO No.: 10LSO-0124 Effective Date: Section 3: 7/1/2010 Enrolled Act No.: HEA0059 Chapter No.: Prime Sponsor: Management Council Catch Title: Revisor's bill. Subject: Corrections of inadvertent errors and omissions in past legislation. Summary/Major Elements: This bill makes technical corrections to current statutes which are incorrect due to changes in statutory citations at the state and federal levels. It also corrects current laws containing errors which were clear oversights or omissions. The bill also corrects errors found in 2010 legislation passed earlier in the session. Other than the corrections of 2010 legislation, any bill passed in the 2010 session in conflict with the revisor's bill takes precedence over the revisor's bill.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 6:19 AM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports concurrence because the bill contains technical corrections, including a name change for a historic site and an amendment contingent on another juvenile detention facility standards bill passing.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
6 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
3 stored
Adopted Standing Committee by H12
Adopted 2nd reading by BURNS
Adopted 3rd reading by ROSS