Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the bill because it establishes a setback distance based on tower height, which ensures greater safety as towers become taller.
Regulation of wind energy facilities.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Bill No.: <billno> Drafter: <drafterinit> Bill No.: HB0072 Drafter: IDS LSO No.: 10LSO-0139 Effective Date: 7/1/2010 Enrolled Act No.: HEA0064 Chapter No.: Prime Sponsor: Representative Stubson Catch Title: Regulation of wind energy facilities. Subject: County regulation of wind energy development. Summary/Major Elements: Requires all facilities generating electricity from wind power, if they produce more than .5 megawatts of electricity, to obtain a permit from every county in which the facility is located. This legislation establishes the minimum standards that counties must apply when issuing the required permits. Exempts from the permit requirement wind energy facilities constructed or being constructed prior to July 1, 2010. Requires permit applications to include: certification of having given required notices, certification of compliance with all requirements established by this legislation together with all county regulations, written emergency management plans, waste management plans, proof of legal access and required road-use agreements, project plans, certifications regarding advertising, site reclamation/decommissioning plans and descriptions of any environmental, social or economic effects. Sets set-back standards from adjoining lands, cities, subdivisions, occupied structures and public roadways. Requires county rules for notice to mineral rights owners. Provides for hearings and public comment. Provides a process for referral by the county to the DEQ's Industrial Siting Council. The Director of the DEQ has the authority to refuse any referral. Any referral made does not relieve a county from considering and permitting a facility. Provides penalties and for permit suspension/revocation. Requires the ISC to adopt new rules regarding the decommissioning and site reclamation of wind energy facilities and financial assurance requirements for permit holders. Provides conforming amendments in the event Senate File 66 (concerning changes to the Industrial Siting Act) is enacted into law.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 6:19 AM
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the bill because it establishes a setback distance based on tower height, which ensures greater safety as towers become taller.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges a no vote because one Senate amendment significantly changed the work of the select committee regarding setback distances between wind facilities and subdivisions.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges a no vote because the Senate expanded setback requirements to half a mile, contradicting previous discussions and task force agreements that favored shorter distances.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues against a half-mile setback because it effectively removes too much usable land from rural subdivisions, while noting that the bill already includes industry-standard safety setbacks based on tower and blade height.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports a half-mile setback to protect neighbors from blades and visual intrusion, noting that cities often discriminate against county residents by applying different standards.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
11 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
13 stored
Filed 2nd reading by ILLOWAY
Adopted, Corrected 2nd reading by ILLOWAY
Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by ILLOWAY
Adopted 2nd reading by SIMPSON
Failed 2nd reading by LANDON
Failed Committee of the Whole by ILLOWAY
Adopted Committee of the Whole by SHEPPERSON
Adopted Standing Committee by H09
Adopted Standing Committee by H02
Adopted 2nd reading by HUNNICUTT
Failed 3rd reading by PERKINS
Adopted 3rd reading by PERKINS
Adopted Standing Committee by LARSON