Why they voted this way
The speaker urges a vote to concur with Senate amendments because minor changes were made and the prime sponsor reviewed and was familiar with the wording.
Resident contractor preferences.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Bill No.: <billno> Drafter: <drafterinit> Bill No.: HB0089 Drafter: JWL LSO No.: 10LSO-0285 Effective Date: Immediately Enrolled Act No.: HEA0060 Chapter No.: Prime Sponsor: Representative Gilmore Catch Title: Resident contractor preferences. Subject: Amendments to resident contractor preference statute Summary/Major Elements: Current law requires a preference for Wyoming resident contractors in the construction of public works. This act provides for application of the resident contractor preference to alternate construction project delivery methods, such as construction manager agent, design-build and construction manager at risk. The act also provides that all bids for contracts using alternate construction project delivery methods shall be opened in public.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 6:25 AM
Why they voted this way
The speaker urges a vote to concur with Senate amendments because minor changes were made and the prime sponsor reviewed and was familiar with the wording.
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the bill to promote Wyoming's brand by ensuring that buildings constructed in the state display Wyoming license plates.
S03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it clarifies that the bill does not apply to professional services by removing language about requests for proposal, which are specific to those services.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because immediate effectiveness is unnecessary and gives industry time to absorb changes rather than hammering out-of-state contractors all at once.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it prevents disrupting ongoing projects while ensuring future bids require sealed envelopes, thereby helping in-state contractors secure work before July 1.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports making the bill effective immediately because contractors are aware of legislative changes and can handle them without significant confusion or disruption to current bids.
S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker expresses concern that removing the term 'request for proposal' creates an unintended consequence by eliminating the resident preference from RFP projects.
S13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it corrects a mistake where negotiating with subs cut out state resident contractors, thereby improving chances for local bidders.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because professional services like engineering and architecture are currently going out of state unnecessarily, despite having qualified local providers. He argues that keeping these contracts in-state helps retain employment and prevents dollars from leaving Wyoming.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill by characterizing an amendment to it as friendly and explicitly asking members to vote for both the amendment and the bill.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker explains the bill restores a preference for subcontractors who felt taken advantage of by out-of-state workers after submitting legitimate bids.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
6 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
6 stored
Adopted 3rd reading by HARSHMAN
Adopted Standing Committee by H09
Failed 2nd reading by HASTERT
Adopted 3rd reading by VON FLATER
Adopted 3rd reading by HASTERT
Adopted Standing Committee by VON FLATER