Mandatory judicial retirement.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 6:36 AM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker believes mandatory retirement should not be in the Constitution but rather set by statute to allow for flexibility, while still favoring some age limit.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that retirement age must be in the Constitution rather than set by legislature to prevent political manipulation of judges based on their rulings.
S04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports keeping the age limit in the Constitution to avoid potential legal challenges regarding age discrimination if it were set by statute instead.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker expresses conflict about removing the arbitrary age limit due to increased longevity but acknowledges the need for an independent judiciary that cannot be easily removed by legislators.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill despite personal dislike because they believe taxing digital products is necessary to ensure fairness between online retailers and local brick-and-mortar businesses.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
7 roll calls
Official activity