Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2010Mirror Bill Used

SF0001

General government appropriations-2.

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

A plain-English summary is not available yet.

Who it affects

Not clearly identified in the stored source.

Limits and unknowns

No additional limitations are listed.

Official record

Sources

Source attached

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 8, 10:50 PM

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports the amendment because it provides a small amount of money from AML funds, which are intended for reclamation and mining problems, to establish a baseline engineering study rather than paying settlements.

Public statementFloor statement at 15:16 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports the amendment to get a structural study completed and resolve the disagreement, noting that the Attorney General's office has not yet spent money on this despite having the ability.

Public statementFloor statement at 16:59 Watch the statement

Cale Case

R · S25

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports this amendment because it inserts language about competitive bidding for video conferencing, which was agreed upon by the university and telecom providers.

Public statementFloor statement at 26:20 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports the amendment to resolve a specific issue where Bighorn School cannot meet county requirements for storm sewers and parking because previous phases of demolition were not approved, potentially preventing an occupancy permit.

Public statementFloor statement at 28:25 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that local governments have suffered from lost sales tax revenue with no other way to increase funds, and this amendment uses excess reserves to help them during a difficult economic time.

Public statementFloor statement at 50:58 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes local government revenues are recovering and stable, suggesting it is better to wait for a supplemental budget if resources allow.

Public statementFloor statement at 53:31 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker supports retaining the office because eliminating its expertise would revert the state to a less capable position regarding school finance litigation and capital construction monitoring.

Public statementFloor statement at 54:20 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment as an opportunity to fulfill a past promise to help local governments that were negatively affected by previous tax changes and are currently relying on state assistance.

Public statementFloor statement at 54:47 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because failing to provide funds will lead to layoffs and create a vicious economic cycle, whereas helping now stops that negative spiral.

Public statementFloor statement at 55:58 Watch the statement

Bill Landen

R · S27

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment by comparing local governments to soldiers on a front line who are being hurt and need immediate help from the state.

Public statementFloor statement at 57:00 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment, arguing that cities have significant reserves while the state has very few, and warns of potential future economic downturns requiring those funds for basic services.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:00:40 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker intends to vote no because he believes the current bill is adequate for local governments and that caution is necessary given the financial circumstances.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:03:31 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because the County Commissioners Association endorsed it as creating a fairer distribution of hardship funds across more counties.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:29:41 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment, comparing its effect on hardship counties to an outdated medical practice of bleeding the sick.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:30:59 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it addresses concerns about extravagant spending on self-promoting brochures and advertisements by government agencies.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:47:05 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because acquiring the property now is a good long-term investment given current capacity issues and market conditions.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:36:18 Watch the statement

Cale Case

R · S25

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because current market conditions allow for saving money by expanding or replacing facilities now rather than later.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:49:59 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they were informed by state officials that it will not directly impact current child health insurance programs and is merely a precaution against future contractual commitments.

Public statementFloor statement at 47:31 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports correcting a budget reduction error because requiring written notices instead of relying on mail would cause small family corporations to become delinquent.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:12:46 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it assumes residents are computerized enough to receive email notifications about delinquency, which is not true in Wyoming.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:18:18 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment but requests clarification on the cost required to compile the study and conduct agency travel before voting.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:21:38 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it provides legislative authority for a program designed to help absent fathers become involved with their children, potentially reducing foster care and juvenile detention numbers.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:24:36 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment as an opportunity for school districts to reassess their transportation methods and reduce inefficiencies.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:15:28 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker urges defeating the amendment because a recalibration process will address school funding issues in the spring, making immediate additional funding unnecessary.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:36:56 Watch the statement

Bill Landen

R · S27

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes it is bad policy to tax liquor dealers specifically for a state building that will also house other agencies like weights and measures.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:43:07 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker suggests a compromise funding approach because she believes it is unreasonable for liquor consumers alone to bear the cost of a building used by multiple state entities.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:45:57 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because delaying the project creates a significant risk of losing federal AML funds if Congress changes laws or acts before the state spends them.

Public statementFloor statement at 3:23:27 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure legislative oversight and caution, arguing that while the technology is proven, specific conditions in this location require further review before full commitment.

Public statementFloor statement at 3:27:26 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to improve access and quality of education for students in isolated communities who currently lack these opportunities.

Public statementFloor statement at 4:21:14 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the measure because it excludes private industry from providing technology and infrastructure, which he believes offers better benefits than state-run systems.

Public statementFloor statement at 4:25:00 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it consolidates fragmented programs across colleges and agencies, ensuring all parts of the state can access quality educational resources.

Public statementFloor statement at 4:28:49 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because deleting its language would cut funding for the statewide video conferencing system, reducing existing capabilities supported by general fund money.

Public statementFloor statement at 4:34:59 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to tighten regulations on contractors by pre-qualifying them before bidding, aiming to stop 'bad actors' who fail to pay workers or subcontractors.

Public statementFloor statement at 4:54:41 Watch the statement

Cale Case

R · S25

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes using a select committee bypasses proper public testimony and regular interim committee processes, which are preferred for handling such issues.

Public statementFloor statement at 5:03:05 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes creating a task force composed of advocates who already believe they are underfunded is an inappropriate way to address budget cuts.

Public statementFloor statement at 5:04:09 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it addresses a necessary issue regarding school facilities accountability, despite believing such changes should be handled through a standalone bill rather than an appropriations section.

Public statementFloor statement at 5:23:20 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

39 roll calls

S Passed 3rd Reading 28-2-0-0-02010-02-25 · Senate28 yes 2 no
Amendment Failed 11-19-0-0-02010-02-25 · Senate11 yes 19 no
Amendment Failed 14-16-0-0-02010-02-25 · Senate14 yes 16 no
Amendment Adopted 23-7-0-0-02010-02-25 · Senate23 yes 7 no
Amendment Adopted 30-0-0-0-02010-02-25 · Senate30 yes 0 no
Amendment Adopted 15-14-0-0-12010-02-25 · Senate15 yes 14 no
Amendment Failed 10-19-0-0-12010-02-25 · Senate10 yes 19 no
Amendment Adopted 15-14-0-0-12010-02-25 · Senate15 yes 14 no
Amendment Adopted 17-13-0-0-02010-02-25 · Senate17 yes 13 no
Amendment Failed 14-16-0-0-02010-02-25 · Senate14 yes 16 no
Amendment Adopted 17-13-0-0-02010-02-25 · Senate17 yes 13 no
Amendment Adopted 19-10-1-0-02010-02-25 · Senate19 yes 10 no
Amendment Failed 1-28-1-0-02010-02-25 · Senate1 yes 28 no
Amendment Failed 5-24-1-0-02010-02-25 · Senate5 yes 24 no
Amendment Adopted 20-9-1-0-02010-02-25 · Senate20 yes 9 no
Amendment Adopted 19-11-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate19 yes 11 no
Amendment Failed 6-24-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate6 yes 24 no
Amendment Failed 12-18-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate12 yes 18 no
Amendment Adopted 30-0-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate30 yes 0 no
Amendment Failed 9-21-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate9 yes 21 no
Amendment Failed 15-15-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate15 yes 15 no
Amendment Failed 15-15-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate15 yes 15 no
Amendment Failed 8-22-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate8 yes 22 no
Amendment Failed 11-18-0-0-12010-02-23 · Senate11 yes 18 no
Amendment Failed 10-20-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate10 yes 20 no
Amendment Failed 12-18-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate12 yes 18 no
Amendment Adopted 18-11-1-0-02010-02-23 · Senate18 yes 11 no
Amendment Adopted 30-0-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate30 yes 0 no
Amendment Failed 7-23-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate7 yes 23 no
Amendment Failed 9-21-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate9 yes 21 no
Amendment Failed 11-19-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate11 yes 19 no
Amendment Failed 9-21-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate9 yes 21 no
Amendment Adopted 19-11-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate19 yes 11 no
Amendment Failed 8-22-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate8 yes 22 no
Amendment Failed 7-23-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate7 yes 23 no
Amendment Failed 11-19-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate11 yes 19 no
Amendment Adopted 22-8-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate22 yes 8 no
Amendment Failed 13-17-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate13 yes 17 no
Amendment Adopted 30-0-0-0-02010-02-23 · Senate30 yes 0 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. See Mirror Bill HB0001House
  2. H Appointed JCC01 MembersHouse
  3. Pursuant to JR 14-1 Referred Directly to JCC01House
  4. H Amendments AdoptedHouse
  5. Amendment AdoptedHouse
  6. Pursuant to JR 14-1 Referred Directly to 3rd ReadingHouse
  7. H Introduced and Referred to H02House
  8. H Received for IntroductionHouse
  9. S Passed 3rd ReadingSenate
  10. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  11. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  12. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  13. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  14. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  15. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  16. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  17. Amendment FailedSenate
  18. Amendment FailedSenate
  19. Amendment FailedSenate
  20. Amendment FailedSenate

Changes

Amendments

80 stored

SF0001HS001

Adopted Standing Committee by H02

SF0001S2001

Failed 2nd reading by SCOTT

SF0001S2002

Adopted 2nd reading by SCHIFFER

SF0001S2003

Failed 2nd reading by CASE

SF0001S2004

Withdrawn 2nd reading by COE

SF0001S2005

Adopted 2nd reading by SCOTT

SF0001S2006

Adopted 2nd reading by LARSON

SF0001S2007

Failed 2nd reading by LANDEN

SF0001S2008

Withdrawn 2nd reading by JOHNSON

SF0001S2009

Adopted 2nd reading by BEBOUT

SF0001S2010

Failed 2nd reading by SCOTT

SF0001S2011

Failed 2nd reading by CASE

SF0001S2012

Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by CASE

SF0001S2013

Failed 2nd reading by MEYER

SF0001S2014

Adopted 2nd reading by MASSIE

SF0001S2015

Failed 2nd reading by ESQUIBEL,F

SF0001S2016

Adopted 2nd reading by MASSIE

SF0001S2017

Withdrawn 2nd reading by CASE

SF0001S2018

Adopted 2nd reading by LANDEN

SF0001S2019

Failed 2nd reading by SCHIFFER

SF0001S2020

Failed 2nd reading by SESSIONS

SF0001S2021

Withdrawn 2nd reading by HASTERT

SF0001S2022

Failed 2nd reading by LANDEN

SF0001S2023

Withdrawn 2nd reading by LARSON

SF0001S2024

Adopted 2nd reading by MASSIE

SF0001S2025

Failed 2nd reading by CASE

SF0001S2026

Failed 2nd reading by CASE

SF0001S2027

Adopted 2nd reading by NICHOLAS

SF0001S2028

Withdrawn 2nd reading by VON FLATER

SF0001S2029

Failed 2nd reading by MARTIN

SF0001S2030

Failed 2nd reading by COOPER

SF0001S2031

Adopted 2nd reading by COE

SF0001S2032

Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by VON FLATER

SF0001S2033

Withdrawn 2nd reading by JENNINGS

SF0001S2034

Failed 2nd reading by HASTERT

SF0001S2035

Failed 2nd reading by JENNINGS

SF0001S2036

Failed 2nd reading by MEIER

SF0001S2037

Failed 2nd reading by HASTERT

SF0001S2038

Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by SESSIONS

SF0001S2039

Adopted 2nd reading by NICHOLAS

SF0001S2040

Withdrawn 2nd reading by NICHOLAS

SF0001S2041

Withdrawn 2nd reading by NICHOLAS

SF0001S2042

Withdrawn 2nd reading by NICHOLAS

SF0001S2043

Withdrawn 2nd reading by NICHOLAS

SF0001S2044

Withdrawn 2nd reading by NICHOLAS

SF0001S2045

Adopted 2nd reading by NICHOLAS

SF0001S2046

Adopted 2nd reading by NICHOLAS

SF0001S2047

Failed 2nd reading by SCHIFFER

SF0001S3001

Failed 3rd reading by MEIER

SF0001S3002

Failed 3rd reading by MEIER

SF0001S3003

Adopted 3rd reading by COE

SF0001S3004

Adopted 3rd reading by GEIS

SF0001S3005

Failed 3rd reading by CASE

SF0001S3006

Failed 3rd reading by JOHNSON

SF0001S3007

Failed 3rd reading by ESQUIBEL,F

SF0001S3008

Adopted 3rd reading by CASE

SF0001S3009

Adopted 3rd reading by BURNS

SF0001S3010

Failed 3rd reading by HASTERT

SF0001S3011

Adopted 3rd reading by BEBOUT

SF0001S3012

Failed 3rd reading by MEIER

SF0001S3013

Adopted 3rd reading by ROSS

SF0001S3014

Withdrawn 3rd reading by LANDEN

SF0001S3015

Adopted 3rd reading by HASTERT

SF0001S3016

Adopted 3rd reading by BURNS

SF0001S3017

Adopted 3rd reading by MASSIE

SF0001S3018

Failed 3rd reading by MEYER

SF0001S3019

Failed 3rd reading by HASTERT

SF0001S3020

Failed 3rd reading by PETERSON

SF0001S3021

Adopted, Corrected 3rd reading by BEBOUT

SF0001S3022

Adopted 3rd reading by COE

SF0001S3023

Adopted 3rd reading by NICHOLAS

SF0001S3024

Adopted 3rd reading by NICHOLAS

SF0001S3025

Adopted 3rd reading by NICHOLAS

SF0001S3026

Adopted 3rd reading by CASE

SF0001S3027

Adopted 3rd reading by CASE

SF0001S3028

Adopted 3rd reading by SCHIFFER

SF0001S3029

Adopted 3rd reading by MASSIE

SF0001S3030

Failed 3rd reading by BEBOUT

SF0001S3031

Withdrawn 3rd reading by BEBOUT

SF0001S3032

Adopted 3rd reading by NICHOLAS