Statement of consideration.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 11:50 PM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because taxpayers should know what other properties sold for if their own property taxes are based on those sales, even though obtaining that information currently requires difficult steps.
H36
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker finds it difficult to vote for the bill because they believe it violates privacy rights regarding home purchase prices and fails to provide sufficient data like square footage or bedroom counts to help the public assess property values.
H01
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill due to concerns about privacy and because assessors confirmed that comparable sales information is already available through existing channels, making this legislation unnecessary.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because frustrated taxpayers need more access to information to understand their property assessments, and this legislation provides better transparency than previous measures.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because there is no compelling reason for it given that assessment information is already available, and they view the legislation as an unnecessary burden.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because they view it as an unnecessary intrusion into people's lives and question why commercial and ranch properties were excluded.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill to ensure taxpayers have access to sales data used by assessors for residential property valuations, which is necessary because assessments rely on market comparisons.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes publishing statements of consideration because it feels abhorrent to expose personal financial details and may encourage people to hide or falsify numbers.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe jumping over privacy fences regarding financial information is offensive.
H54
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker stated they will vote for the bill because their county contacted them and requested support, noting that local groups have experienced similar issues discussed in the debate.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker explained they are ready to support the bill after previously voting against it, citing a new agreement reached by all parties involved.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to protect personal privacy by redacting identifying information from public records, arguing that property details alone are sufficient for tax and market analysis.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because taxpayers need access to identifying information in statements of consideration to verify how their property tax assessments are determined and to make informed home purchase decisions.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because he believes personal identifying information is unnecessary for determining fair tax assessments, even though property addresses are critical.
S04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes property ownership and address data is already readily available through other means, making state protection of this information unnecessary.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because removing addresses from statements of consideration would render them useless for taxpayers trying to appeal their property tax assessments.
R · S16
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he views information transparency as the necessary next step for property tax relief, which requires keeping identifying details in public records.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to remove personal names from public records while keeping addresses, arguing that individuals should not be dragged into their neighbors' tax disputes.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because it makes property assessment statements public documents, allowing taxpayers to review comparable sales and understand how their property value was determined.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
6 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
2 stored
Withdrawn 2nd reading by MEIER
Failed 3rd reading by MEIER