Hathaway success curriculum-2.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
HB0013 Bill No.: HB0013 Drafter: JDA LSO No.: 11LSO-0252 Effective Date: Enrolled Act No.: HEA0101 Chapter No.: Prime Sponsor: Joint Education Interim Committee Catch Title: Hathaway success curriculum-2. Subject: Hathaway success curriculum. Summary/Major Elements: Extends the current requirements specified in the Hathaway success curriculum to school years after 2010-2011.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 6:47 AM
H05
Why they voted this way
The speaker explains that the second conference committee report was necessary because a specific paragraph in the original bill would have caused the success curriculum to cease to exist if not passed. The new report strikes the entire bill except for the cleanup language on page 1, line 12.
H05
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes concurrence because the Senate amendments add new requirements and a potentially abusive waiver provision, which contradicts the bill's original intent.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports concurrence because the Senate amendments address previous concerns regarding course requirements and provide a necessary waiver for districts unable to offer specific classes.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports concurrence because they view the waiver as a good compromise that provides flexibility for students to take fine arts or technical education courses.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes concurrence because they believe the amendments increase requirements rather than providing choice, which is contrary to the bill's purpose.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes concurrence because they fear the waiver provision is too broad and could allow any element of the success curriculum to be waived.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports an amendment to require reporting on waivers granted under the bill to identify if a pattern of usage is developing among schools.
S18
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker asks for support of the bill because it balances pressure from various communities while maintaining rigor and leaving room for other courses within a scholarship program.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the second reading amendment to allow students more choice in subjects, arguing that engagement increases when studying chosen topics and that restricting options harms enrollment in arts and technical fields.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges support for the third reading amendment to limit choices to foreign language, performing arts, and vocational education, believing these specific areas encourage brain development while still offering students an option.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the third reading amendment because feedback from school districts indicates the second reading amendment would cause chaos and overwhelm them, making it too much change for now.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the third reading amendment because he has received no requests from his district or students to add more classes, viewing the second reading amendment as a solution looking for a problem.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the third reading amendment because many subjects in the second reading amendment are already covered, and adding too much choice will cause students to lose focus.
H50
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges defeating the second reading amendment because students need flexibility in their curriculum to better prepare for jobs beyond basic education.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the third reading amendment because he believes education must return to basics like reading, writing, and arithmetic rather than experimenting with new subjects.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the third reading amendment because his district strongly favors focused choice as originally expressed in House Bill 13.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the third reading amendment because constituents in his district are concerned about the bill being perceived as 'dumbing down' the Hathaway Scholarship.
R · H37
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the third reading amendment because he believes choice is good but too much choice is bad, and that the original bill provides sufficient flexibility without compromising core math and science requirements.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
8 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
8 stored
Adopted 2nd reading by MADDEN
Adopted 3rd reading by MCOMIE
Failed Committee of the Whole by CONNOLLY
Failed Committee of the Whole by HARSHMAN
Adopted 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Adopted 3rd reading by COE
Adopted 3rd reading by VON FLATER
Adopted Standing Committee by COE