Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2011Enacted

HB0029

Wyoming Law Change: Removing the Right to Refuse DUI Tests

Last scannedOct 19, 2026, 2:19 AM

In one sentence

This law removes a driver's right to refuse alcohol or drug tests after a DUI arrest and allows police to get a remote search warrant to force a test.

What it does

  • Removes the right for a person arrested for DUI to refuse a chemical test.
  • Requires a person who refuses a test to submit to one if a search warrant is issued.
  • Creates a new type of search warrant that can be issued by a judge over the phone or video.
  • Requires all communication for these remote warrants to be recorded.
  • Limits the use of test results to determining if the person was driving under the influence.
  • Removes most administrative penalties for refusing a test, except for commercial drivers.

Who it affects

  • Drivers arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances.
  • Peace officers who request chemical tests.
  • Judicial officers who issue search warrants.
  • Commercial drivers who face license suspension for refusing tests.

Limits and unknowns

  • The law does not specify the exact technical methods for recording remote communications beyond stating they must be recorded.
  • The source text does not detail how this change affects municipal ordinances beyond stating prosecution under state law bars similar local charges.

Plain language

Terms to know

Remotely communicated search warrant
A legal order for a test issued by a judge who is not in the same room as the police officer, using voice, video, or text.
Chemical test
A test, such as a breath, blood, or urine test, used to measure alcohol or drug levels in the body.
Probable cause
A reasonable belief, based on facts, that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime exists.

Official record

Sources

Source checked
Read the official summary

Bill No.: <billno> Drafter: <drafterinit> Bill No.: HB0029 Drafter: JHR LSO No.: 11LSO-0161 Effective Date: 7/1/2011 Enrolled Act No.: HEA0093 Chapter No.: 178 Prime Sponsor: Representative Gingery Catch Title: DUI-elimination of right to refuse test. Subject: Elimination of the "implied consent law" and the right to refuse chemical tests to determine whether a person was driving while under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance. Summary/Major Elements: ● Provides that a person under arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance who refuses a chemical test shall still be required to submit to a chemical test upon issuance of a search warrant. ● Creates a "remotely communicated search warrant" which may be issued upon sworn or affirmed testimony of the peace officer who is not in the physical presence of the judicial officer. For issuance of a "remotely communicated search warrant": o The judicial officer must be satisfied that probable cause exists for issuance of the remotely communicated search warrant; o All communication between the judicial officer and the peace officer or prosecuting attorney must be recorded; o The judicial officer may direct the peace officer or prosecuting attorney requesting the remotely communicated search warrant to sign the judicial officer's name on a warrant from a remote location. ● A remotely communicated search warrant shall only be valid to administer a chemical tests to determine whether a person was driving while under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance after the person refuses the test. ● Results from chemical tests to determine blood-alcohol or controlled substance levels shall only be used to determine whether the person was driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances. ● Repeals the administrative penalties for refusing to submit to a chemical tests to determine whether a person was driving while under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance, except for suspension of a commercial driver's license. ● Makes conforming amendments relating to the repeal of the right to refuse a test.

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 9, 1:26 AM

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because it includes a judicial officer as a gatekeeper who must find probable cause before authorizing a test, even if done remotely. He believes this addresses concerns about search warrants and ensures the process is not just an officer's whim.

Public statementFloor statement at 14:13 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill as a good compromise that incorporates remote search warrants, noting that experience in other states shows people are more likely to voluntarily comply once they know a judge has reviewed and approved the probable cause.

Public statementFloor statement at 19:04 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker explains that the amendment corrects a citation error to ensure blood samples taken at hospitals cannot be used for any purpose other than DUI testing, extending this protection from just youth to all adults and CDL drivers.

Public statementFloor statement at 21:09 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because hiding DUI convictions from insurers will prevent them from assessing risk, ultimately causing insurance rates to rise for all constituents.

Public statementFloor statement at 27:07 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment by stating that statistics show drunk drivers are rarely caught on their first offense and that university students already know the consequences of DUI laws.

Public statementFloor statement at 28:29 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment as a reasonable compromise to address employability issues for those with DUI records while acknowledging that implied consent laws already limit other legal defenses.

Public statementFloor statement at 30:04 Watch the statement

Cale Case

R · S25

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment if there is a higher standard requiring physical evidence of intoxication before obtaining a search warrant.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:30:00 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it assumes people without licenses will not drive, ignoring proven opportunities for them to continue driving.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:38:10 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

6 roll calls

H Did Concur 40-18-1-1-02011-03-01 · House40 yes 18 no
S Passed 3rd Reading 20-10-0-0-02011-02-28 · Senate20 yes 10 no
Amendment Failed 10-20-0-0-02011-02-25 · Senate10 yes 20 no
S01 Recommended Do Pass 4-1-0-0-02011-02-07 · Senate4 yes 1 no
H Passed 3rd Reading 35-23-2-0-02011-01-26 · House35 yes 23 no
H01 Recommended Amend and Do Pass 5-4-0-0-02011-01-18 · House5 yes 4 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. Assigned Chapter NumberLSO
  2. Governor Signed HEA0093Governor
  3. S President Signed HEA No. 0093Senate
  4. H Speaker Signed HEA No. 0093House
  5. Assigned Number HEA0093LSO
  6. H Did ConcurHouse
  7. H Received for ConcurrenceHouse
  8. S Passed 3rd ReadingSenate
  9. Amendment FailedSenate
  10. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  11. S Laid Back Pursuant to SR 10-4(a)Senate
  12. Amendment FailedSenate
  13. Amendment FailedSenate
  14. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  15. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  16. S Passed 2nd ReadingSenate
  17. S Passed CoWSenate
  18. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  19. S Amendments AdoptedSenate
  20. Amendment AdoptedSenate

Changes

Amendments

9 stored

HB0029HS001

Adopted Standing Committee by H01

HB0029S3001

Adopted 3rd reading by BURNS

HB0029S3002

Adopted, Corrected 3rd reading by BURNS

HB0029S3003

Failed 3rd reading by MEIER

HB0029S3004

Failed 3rd reading by MEIER

HB0029S3005

Adopted 3rd reading by BURNS

HB0029S3006

Failed 3rd reading by MEIER

HB0029SW001

Adopted Committee of the Whole by JOHNSON

HB0029SW002

Adopted Committee of the Whole by PERKINS