Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2011Enacted

HB0152

Very rare or uncommon area designations.

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

A plain-English summary is not available yet.

Who it affects

Not clearly identified in the stored source.

Limits and unknowns

No additional limitations are listed.

Official record

Sources

Source attached

Official summary

Bill No.: <billno> Drafter: <drafterinit> Bill No.: HB0152 Drafter: DKG LSO No.: 11LSO-0367 Effective Date: 7/1/2011 Enrolled Act No.: HEA0069 Chapter No.: 140 Prime Sponsor: Representative Semlek Catch Title: Very rare or uncommon area designations. Subject: Designation of areas in the state as rare or uncommon by the environmental quality council. Summary/Major Elements: ● This act eliminates the authority of the environmental quality council to designate lands as "very rare" or "uncommon" under the Environmental Quality Act. (Designation of areas as rare or uncommon restricted mining permits if operation would irreparably harm, destroy, or materially impair any area that had been designated as rare or uncommon.) ● Lands designated prior to July 1, 2011 retain the designation until removed by the council. The council retains the authority to remove such a designation.

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 9, 1:26 AM

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because it fails to notify landowners when adjacent areas are designated as rare or uncommon, thereby removing their right to participate in court procedures.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:04:04 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes locking land designations in perpetuity by removing the EQC's ability to delist. He argues that unforeseen circumstances may arise and that other state decisions are not locked away forever.

Public statementFloor statement at 54:31 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because he and others do not trust the appointed board to make designations. He argues that if delisting is needed, it should be brought directly to the legislature for a vote.

Public statementFloor statement at 55:56 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because she believes locking lands in perpetuity is wrong and that circumstances change over time. She argues the EQC should retain authority to remove designations if they were made incorrectly or are no longer needed.

Public statementFloor statement at 57:36 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

5 roll calls

H Did Concur 57-0-3-0-02011-02-25 · House57 yes 0 no
S Passed 3rd Reading 23-7-0-0-02011-02-25 · Senate23 yes 7 no
S05 Recommended Do Pass 5-0-0-0-02011-02-04 · Senate5 yes 0 no
H Passed 3rd Reading 45-13-2-0-02011-02-01 · House45 yes 13 no
H05 Recommended Do Pass 7-2-0-0-02011-01-27 · House7 yes 2 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. Assigned Chapter NumberLSO
  2. Governor Signed HEA0069Governor
  3. S President Signed HEA No. 0069Senate
  4. H Speaker Signed HEA No. 0069House
  5. Assigned Number HEA0069LSO
  6. H Did ConcurHouse
  7. H Received for ConcurrenceHouse
  8. S Passed 3rd ReadingSenate
  9. Amendment FailedSenate
  10. S Passed 2nd ReadingSenate
  11. Amendment FailedSenate
  12. Amendment FailedSenate
  13. S Passed CoWSenate
  14. S Amendments AdoptedSenate
  15. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  16. Amendment FailedSenate
  17. S Placed on General FileSenate
  18. S05 Recommended Do PassSenate
  19. S Introduced and Referred to S05Senate
  20. S Received for IntroductionSenate

Changes

Amendments

6 stored

HB0152H3001

Failed 3rd reading by ZWONITZ,DN

HB0152S2001

Failed 2nd reading by ROTHFUSS

HB0152S2002

Failed 2nd reading by ROTHFUSS

HB0152S3001

Failed 3rd reading by HASTERT

HB0152SW001

Failed Committee of the Whole by CASE

HB0152SW002

Adopted Committee of the Whole by BEBOUT