Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the division because removing immunity while requiring landlords to change locks exposes them to liability from other tenants with contractual rights, which he views as bad policy.
Wyoming Safe Homes Act-2.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Bill No.: <billno> Drafter: <drafterinit> Bill No.: HB0256 Drafter: LGC LSO No.: 11LSO-0588 Effective Date: 7/1/2011 Enrolled Act No.: HEA0097 Chapter No.: Prime Sponsor: Representative Craft Catch Title: Wyoming Safe Homes Act-2. Subject: Protections for tenants who have been subject to domestic abuse or sexual violence. Summary/Major Elements: Under current law there are no specific protections for tenants who have been subject to domestic abuse or sexual violence. This act provides that in any action brought by a landlord to recover rent from a tenant, the tenant shall have an affirmative defense and not be liable for rent when the tenant vacates the property if a court finds that: At the time the tenant vacated, the tenant or a member of the tenant's household was under a credible imminent threat of domestic abuse or sexual violence at the premises as demonstrated by medical, court or police evidence; The tenant gave at least seven days written notice to the landlord before vacating, stating that the reason for vacating was because of the threat of domestic abuse or sexual violence; If the tenant vacated the property because of an occurrence of domestic abuse or sexual violence, the domestic abuse or sexual violence occurred not more than sixty days prior to the tenant giving notice, unless the tenant could not reasonably have given notice within that time period. This act prohibits a landlord from terminating a tenancy based solely on the applicant's or household member's status as a victim of domestic abuse or sexual violence. This act also provides that the protections in the act may not be waive or modified by any lease or separate agreement. Comments: Popular name: Wyoming Safe Homes Act
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 7:56 PM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the division because removing immunity while requiring landlords to change locks exposes them to liability from other tenants with contractual rights, which he views as bad policy.
H50
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports removing the immunity provision because landlords should face liability if they act unreasonably, noting that broad immunity prevents judging specific facts of wrongful versus rightful lawsuits.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues for keeping provisions to help victims whose lives are disrupted by stating that without these measures, there would be greater obstacles preventing them from feeling safe or moving easily.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
5 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
6 stored
Filed 3rd reading by CRAFT
Adopted 3rd reading by CRAFT
Failed 3rd reading by CRAFT
Adopted Committee of the Whole by CRAFT
Failed Standing Committee by H01
Adopted Standing Committee by PERKINS