SF0047

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker believes the initiative is wrong for both the legislative body and the state of Wyoming.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because adding restrictions was not part of the original discussion and Wyoming already has an exhaustive list of places where concealed carry is prohibited.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe issues regarding who can carry weapons should be addressed in a separate bill rather than this one.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment based on personal experience where doctors at a weapons-free campus carry concealed weapons while on duty.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they have experienced hospitals attempting to confiscate firearms via forms, which they believe is unnecessary and should be defeated.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because hospitals requested it to clarify their authority to ban firearms under state law. They also believe there is no need for individuals to carry concealed weapons in a hospital setting.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the second amendment because as a small business owner they want clear statutory rights to prohibit firearms on their property, noting that current case law is unclear.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because school board members manage large budgets and suffer financial sacrifices, so compensation would encourage better performance.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because school board members have consistently voted against compensation, preferring to serve for the sake of children rather than money.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because school board members have requested that the issue be reviewed and considered by a select committee rather than having compensation removed entirely.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill and its amendment because it provides law enforcement with a necessary tool to address intoxicated individuals who carry weapons, distinguishing them from law-abiding citizens.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the standing committee amendment because it infringes on rights by requiring chemical test consent from anyone carrying a concealed weapon, not just those who are intoxicated.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes Committee of the Whole Amendment No. 1 because it goes beyond the original intentions of the bill sponsor and the Senate.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes Committee of the Whole Amendment No. 1 because it is not germane to the bill's purpose and appears designed to undermine the legislation.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes Committee of the Whole Amendment No. 1 because it would mess with existing restrictions on where weapons can be carried.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes Committee of the Whole Amendment No. 1 because it addresses where weapons can be carried, which is not what this bill is about.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports Committee of the Whole Amendment No. 1 because it amends restrictions on where concealed firearms may be carried, which is germane to the bill.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that training requirements are essential for safety when dealing with concealed firearms and aims to restore this requirement without creating a central registration database.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because granting reciprocity for invasive species stickers would reduce revenue from out-of-state boaters that is needed to fund the program.