Why they voted this way
The speaker explains that the committee agreed with the Senate's position to reinstate funding for a forensic analyst, arguing it is necessary to run the program effectively.
Spice drugs.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Bill No.: <billno> Drafter: <drafterinit> Bill No.: SF0059 Drafter: LNS LSO No.: 11LSO-0023 Effective Date: 3/3/2011 Enrolled Act No.: SEA0085 Chapter No.: 137 Prime Sponsor: Senator Esquibel, F. Catch Title: Spice drugs. Subject: Controlled Substances Act. Summary/Major Elements: ● The act adds various substances known as "spice" to Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. ● The act provides for an additional forensic analyst for the attorney general to implement the act. Comments: ● This act appropriates $56,736 from the general fund to the attorney general to fund one full-time forensic analyst position.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 9:42 AM
Why they voted this way
The speaker explains that the committee agreed with the Senate's position to reinstate funding for a forensic analyst, arguing it is necessary to run the program effectively.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill because making it effective immediately could help save lives, despite losing an appropriation.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes concurrence because law enforcement cannot keep up with testing for new substances, and there is no staff to process the increased workload created by making them illegal.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges voting no because the deletion of an appropriation creates a serious matter given the lack of resources and field tests for these new substances.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
9 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
2 stored
Adopted, Corrected Standing Committee by H10
Adopted Standing Committee by NICHOLAS,P