Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2011Enacted

SF0108

Remote electronic terminals-fees-2.

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

A plain-English summary is not available yet.

Who it affects

Not clearly identified in the stored source.

Limits and unknowns

No additional limitations are listed.

Official record

Sources

Source attached

Official summary

Bill No.: <billno> Drafter: <drafterinit> Bill No.: SF0108 Drafter: JDA LSO No.: 11LSO-0513 Effective Date: 2/22/2011 Enrolled Act No.: SEA0039 Chapter No.: 62 Prime Sponsor: Senator Burns Catch Title: Remote electronic terminals-fees-2. Subject: Remote electronic terminal fees. Summary/Major Elements: Under current law the transaction fee for electronic terminals is set by rule and regulation of the state banking commissioner, up to a maximum of two dollars ($2.00). This act removes the maximum limit on the fees. Fees will be determined by rule and regulation of the state banking commissioner.

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 8, 9:42 AM

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the fee cap because they believe free market capitalism is the fastest path to prosperity and should determine prices rather than legislation.

Public statementFloor statement at 50:00 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment, arguing that free markets should drive fees and that lending institutions use these fees as a benefit to their members.

Public statementFloor statement at 50:53 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment and supports the bill, believing fees should be determined by the free market to cover high operating costs in remote locations.

Public statementFloor statement at 53:15 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe allowing fees to be dictated by the market is necessary to maintain ATM availability in remote locations despite higher costs.

Public statementFloor statement at 54:57 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because setting a fee without considering rising operational costs, such as accessibility upgrades, could cause machines to disappear.

Public statementFloor statement at 55:55 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to cap fees because they believe removing caps would allow prices to rise significantly and that capping them protects residents and visitors.

Public statementFloor statement at 58:34 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

4 roll calls

H Passed 3rd Reading 46-12-2-0-02011-02-18 · House46 yes 12 no
H03 Recommended Do Pass 7-1-1-0-02011-02-07 · House7 yes 1 no
S Passed 3rd Reading 28-2-0-0-02011-01-25 · Senate28 yes 2 no
S03 Recommended Do Pass 5-0-0-0-02011-01-20 · Senate5 yes 0 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. Assigned Chapter NumberLSO
  2. Governor Signed SEA0039Governor
  3. H Speaker Signed SEA No. 0039House
  4. S President Signed SEA No. 0039Senate
  5. Assigned Number SEA0039LSO
  6. H Passed 3rd ReadingHouse
  7. Amendment FailedHouse
  8. H Passed 2nd ReadingHouse
  9. Amendment FailedHouse
  10. H Passed CoWHouse
  11. H Placed on General FileHouse
  12. H03 Recommended Do PassHouse
  13. H Introduced and Referred to H03House
  14. H Received for IntroductionHouse
  15. S Passed 3rd ReadingSenate
  16. S Passed 2nd ReadingSenate
  17. S Passed CoWSenate
  18. S Placed on General FileSenate
  19. S03 Recommended Do PassSenate
  20. S Introduced and Referred to S03Senate

Changes

Amendments

2 stored

SF0108H2001

Failed 2nd reading by BYRD

SF0108H3001

Failed 3rd reading by BYRD