Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the fee cap because they believe free market capitalism is the fastest path to prosperity and should determine prices rather than legislation.
Remote electronic terminals-fees-2.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Bill No.: <billno> Drafter: <drafterinit> Bill No.: SF0108 Drafter: JDA LSO No.: 11LSO-0513 Effective Date: 2/22/2011 Enrolled Act No.: SEA0039 Chapter No.: 62 Prime Sponsor: Senator Burns Catch Title: Remote electronic terminals-fees-2. Subject: Remote electronic terminal fees. Summary/Major Elements: Under current law the transaction fee for electronic terminals is set by rule and regulation of the state banking commissioner, up to a maximum of two dollars ($2.00). This act removes the maximum limit on the fees. Fees will be determined by rule and regulation of the state banking commissioner.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 9:42 AM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the fee cap because they believe free market capitalism is the fastest path to prosperity and should determine prices rather than legislation.
H54
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment, arguing that free markets should drive fees and that lending institutions use these fees as a benefit to their members.
H50
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment and supports the bill, believing fees should be determined by the free market to cover high operating costs in remote locations.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe allowing fees to be dictated by the market is necessary to maintain ATM availability in remote locations despite higher costs.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because setting a fee without considering rising operational costs, such as accessibility upgrades, could cause machines to disappear.
H44
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to cap fees because they believe removing caps would allow prices to rise significantly and that capping them protects residents and visitors.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
4 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
2 stored
Failed 2nd reading by BYRD
Failed 3rd reading by BYRD