Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2012Did Not Pass

HB0068

Severance tax distributions.

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

A plain-English summary is not available yet.

Who it affects

Not clearly identified in the stored source.

Limits and unknowns

No additional limitations are listed.

Official record

Sources

Source attached

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 7, 5:39 PM

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that the bill is necessary to adjust severance tax distributions below a specific cap for inflation, as current fixed amounts have lost buying power since 2001.

Public statementFloor statement at 46:53 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because local entities like highways and water development are already receiving generous funding beyond previous expectations, and he fears returning to a system where earmarks limit budget control.

Public statementFloor statement at 48:59 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill to provide local governments with a constant source of revenue, suggesting that discretionary funding can be reduced to accommodate this commitment.

Public statementFloor statement at 50:43 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

1 roll call

Official activity

Bill history

  1. H Failed IntroductionHouse
  2. H Received for IntroductionHouse
  3. Bill Number AssignedLSO