Wyoming Court Security Act of 2012
In one sentence
Plain language
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 5:39 PM
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill to establish a standardized legislative approach for courthouse security and prevent courts from unilaterally deciding these rules, which they view as an abdication of legislative responsibility.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe it is better policy to wait and limit restrictions only to courtrooms rather than including entire county buildings.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because they view it as an overreach that infringes on citizens' Second Amendment rights and shifts power away from the people who own the buildings.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe the people own the courthouses and should have the authority to decide on firearm restrictions, rather than having rights chipped away by legislation.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because they view it as an overreach that exempts government from its own rules and represents arrogance in restricting basic rights to defend oneself.
Why they voted this way
The speaker explains that current laws create a conflict between legislative preemption and court authority regarding weapons. The bill resolves this by allowing counties to decide on security measures for dangerous situations like family violence, providing flexibility based on local needs.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
3 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
4 stored
Withdrawn 3rd reading by QUARBERG
Adopted, Corrected Committee of the Whole by KROEKER
Failed Committee of the Whole by KROEKER
Adopted Standing Committee by H01