General government appropriations.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
SF0001 Bill No.: SF0001 Drafter: DKG LSO No.: 12LSO-0341 Effective Date: 3/8/2012 Enrolled Act No.: SEA0029 Chapter No.: CH0026 Prime Sponsor: Joint Appropriations Interim Committee Catch Title: General government appropriations. Subject: Budget bill. This bill contains the following appropriations (in millions of dollars) for these major programs: K-12 Foundation program $1.66B in school funds for K-12 programs School Capital Construction $101.8M in school capcon funds for major maintenance Locals - All appropriations to cities, towns and counties Total GF appropriation of $135M plus $33.4M in mineral royalty funds Dept. of Transportation including WYOLINK and airport improvements $70M GF for road construction $1.3M GF for WYOLINK $15.2M GF for airport improvements Business Ready Community Program - Total appropriation of $58.5M GF Community Facility Program - Total appropriation of $8.5M GF Wildlife Trust $11M GF for projects $5M GF for trust fund $684K GF for administration Dept. of Health - Total appropriation of $934.5M GF, split the biennial appropriation into separate fiscal years Added $1.5M for DD programs and waiting lists in FY 2013 Added $400K for AIDS drug rebate program Added $235K for telehealth consortium Added $250K for developing a primary medical care home network Added $85K for combat veterans' assistance materials Added $60K for hearing aids for early childhood intervention Set aside $1.2M for Medicaid emergencies and caseload increases UW - Total appropriation of $394M GF Approved $2M new funding for NCAR MOU Comm Colleges - Total appropriation of $261.5M GF Dept. of Corrections - Total appropriation of $289.1M GF UW Medical Education - $36.3M GF and $9.1M Special revenue funds Capital construction (including major maintenance) - Total appropriation of $63.7M GF $4.4M S0 for A&I state office building $5.9M GF and $16.8M Federal funds for Military Dept Laramie Armory $3.3M for Military Dept Afton Armory $1M for Military Dept cemetery improvements $500K GF for Military Dept land acquisitions $1M omnibus permanent land fund for Dept of Corrections Women's Center $15.4M GF and $11.3M private funding sources for various community college projects $36M GF and $22M revenue bond funds for various university projects Employee compensation Approved $5.2M for retiree insurance Approved 1% of payroll for future retiree insurance Game & Fish Approved $8.9M for various programs Appropriation to LSRA (savings) - $15M GF Appropriation of $30M GF revenues from FY 2012 Permanent Wyoming Mineral Trust Fund earnings in excess of the amounts projected by CREG in the January 2012 revenue estimates to the AML Balancing Account created by HB0121 Provision for transfer of $150M from LSRA to GF in the case CREG issues a revised forecast between the regular January and October reports which lowers natural gas income to the general fund and budget reserve account by at least $150M Provision for 4% General Fund standard budget reductions in FY 2014 budgets. Provision for 8% General Fund standard budget reductions in FY 2015-16 budget requests. Totals General Fund Appropriations - $3.22 Billion Federal Fund Appropriations $1.6 Billion Other State Fund Appropriations - $3.35 Billion Total appropriations in budget bill - $8.17 Billion The following reports are required under the budget bill: A&I report to JAC on containing a complete history of surplus property sales for the last five (5) years. The department shall also examine payment methods other than cash, for sales occurring after July 1, 2013. A&I - employees' group insurance division shall report quarterly to the joint appropriations committee and the joint labor, health and social services interim committee on the effectiveness of alternative payment and delivery systems for healthcare services to plan participants. Potential plan incentives to encourage appropriate use of high value services, including necessary prescription drugs and preventive services, adoption of healthy lifestyles, and the use of highly performing providers who adhere to evidence-based treatment guidelines shall be included in the report. A&I report results of a study of the feasibility of converting school district motor vehicles to natural gas fueled vehicles, to the governor and the JAC by November 1, 2012. CIO - No later than the fifteenth of every month, the state chief information officer shall report to the governor, the JAC and the joint education interim committee, aspects of the administration and implementation of school finance and data collection required by various Wyoming statutes and in accordance with 2012 Senate File 33, his findings regarding duties under this footnote. Attorney General - As necessary to conform to federal requirements, victim assistance providers shall not be required to submit annual unduplicated counts of the number of victims served in order to qualify for funding under W.S. 1-40-118 for the 2013-2014 fiscal biennium. Providers receiving funding under W.S. 1-40-118 shall be required to report the number of victims served on an unduplicated program level. School Facilities Commission report to the JAC and the select school facilities commission no later than September 15, 2012 regarding charter school facilities. DOH report from State Hospital to JAC annually on the use of self-generated fees renewal of current report requirement, by November 1. DWS - preliminary report on the effectiveness of alternative back and spine injury treatment trials to the joint labor, health and social services interim committee on or before October 1, 2012 and a final outcomes report on or before October 1, 2013. OSLI - The director of the office of state lands and investments shall review the control, leasing, exchange, care and disposal of all institutional acquired lands held by the department of family services, the department of health and the department of corrections to determine whether such lands are being managed for the highest best use. The director to report to the joint minerals, business and economic development interim committee by October 1, 2012. Retirement - The board of directors shall provide a detailed report explaining the individual salaries paid for specified positions, benefits provided, performance justification for the salaries and job appraisals annually by July 31 to the JAC. Section 326 Educational Accountability Data Systems - On or before December 31, 2012, and on or before December 31, 2013, the state CIO shall report to the JAC and the joint education interim committee regarding progress on education data systems and recommendations on future development and implementation of the data systems. Governor ongoing report via B-11 process any reductions to agency budgets under the budget reduction authority due to revenue shortfalls. Supreme Court budget requests submitted to JAC by November 1, 2012 for 2013-2014 supplemental requests, and by November 1, 2013 for 2015-2016 biennial budget requests. NOTE: The Governor vetoed the following provisions: A&I footnote 4 in the state CIO's review of the school finance and data collection provisions, the word "oversight" was vetoed, as was the monthly reporting provision. In the DEQ's solid waste budget, a footnote capped the ability to fill vacancies at 43 FTE, should vacancies in the 46 authorized FTE occur. The footnote was vetoed. In employee benefits, the governor used the line item veto to correct inadvertently lower amounts for employee insurance contributions. Zero based budgeting was required for the upcoming biennium in the 200, 600 and 900 series. The 200 series requirement was vetoed.
Public statements
Last checked Aug 8, 5:17 AM
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because it eliminates the Healthy Frontiers program, which he argues is a necessary lower-cost alternative to Medicaid expansion under national health reform. He also cites poor budget priorities regarding funding for developmental disability waiting lists as sufficient reasons to vote against the measure.
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes diverting funds from the Wildlife Trust Fund because it has been a successful program for preserving habitat while allowing resource development to continue.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because reducing funding would risk losing a five-to-one federal match, costing more than the state savings from cutting the program.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it provides necessary direction for administering an already approved appropriation that was previously undefined in how it should be used.
S03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports funding to ensure the university maintains its national accreditation, which is vital for attracting students and ensuring graduates are employable outside the state.
S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the funding as an opportunity to mitigate bark beetle impacts through responsible harvesting, preventing further forest devastation similar to what has occurred in other parts of the state.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure engineering students can utilize a $30 million state investment in NCAR computing resources, arguing that building facilities is necessary to maximize this existing commitment.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it pits colleges against each other, and based on accreditation needs expressed by others, the performing arts should be prioritized.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because passing it leaves insufficient funds for either project, whereas current resources can address the performing arts' number one priority and accreditation deadline.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it reinstates a derailed master plan priority, arguing that engineering improvements are essential for economic diversification and attracting research dollars.
S13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a one-time merit pay measure that values employees without compromising future funds or breaking the bank.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to cut funding because current teams are not recruiting local Wyoming students and it is unrealistic to expect baseball games to be played in snowy conditions.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because $250,000 is too much for a study that could be done in-house and spending it sends an inappropriate message dictating to the university.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to save money, citing that while football and basketball work well in Wyoming's climate, baseball cannot be played outdoors during spring blizzards.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to increase direct money because constituents in his district want more discretionary funds to leverage loans for water and sewer projects.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to give local governments more power and latitude, trusting their experience on county commissions to manage funds appropriately for infrastructure needs.
R · S16
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to provide local government workers with discretionary tools, believing they know best how to use their money on the front lines.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because his experience as a city councilman showed discretionary money shrinking, and he believes local officials know best how to use their funds.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because changing the distribution formula risks shifting funds from necessary construction projects to payroll and operations, preventing needed infrastructure work.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because direct distribution avoids difficult consensus negotiations between counties and municipalities while still leaving sufficient funds for joint projects that can be leveraged.
R · S01
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that the bill is necessary to ensure continued funding for counties with multiple entities or multi-year projects, as it prevents funds from reverting back into a general pot where priorities might change.
S04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it is a policy issue that should undergo full legislative consideration and testimony rather than being inserted into a budget bill.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes it is appropriate to allow the Department of Health to reduce spending on contracts as part of necessary budget cuts.
R · S16
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because he views it as a good program where hospitals are already interested and represented, warranting an opportunity to proceed.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker cites personal experience with his son's condition and a local family to emphasize the critical need for timely intervention before progress windows close.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker expresses concern that the current system forces people to wait until treatment is no longer effective for acquired brain injuries, creating a chronic problem.
S18
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because arts funding acts as infrastructure that improves quality of life in small communities where donations and public support have declined.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment by arguing that operating support funding is critical for arts programs to function, comparing it to gas in a bus needed to transport children and develop skills.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it funds a necessary leasing arrangement and maintenance for a charter school in his district that has unique funding requirements.
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports restoring funding to cover operational costs resulting from a significant increase in community college enrollment since 2004-2005.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the amendment because community colleges are priority educational institutions essential for preparing a workforce to attract businesses and secure the state's future, unlike other agencies.
S03
Why they voted this way
The speaker opposes the amendment because there is insufficient funding available and more time is needed to evaluate whether the requested amount can be afforded before voting.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it is a technical cleanup that ensures the budget correctly references a previously passed bill regarding water projects.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to prevent the Department of Transportation from shifting federal funds to cover general fund cuts, ensuring that any reductions are real and honest.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the funding because successful policies have increased student enrollment, which necessitates additional support services and faculty to retain those students.
S13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to fund hearing aids for children with hearing loss, arguing that early intervention prevents higher long-term costs associated with special education and public assistance.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment as a necessary stopgap measure to help children who cannot afford hearing aids, noting that early intervention saves money on special education costs.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because existing safety nets like Medicaid and S-CHIP already cover eligible children, and adding new unfunded programs contradicts current budget cut goals.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure funding decisions follow a competitive peer-reviewed process rather than being predetermined by legislators.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to prevent the return of earmarking practices and bypassing established processes, citing past negative experiences with such battles.
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it is poor budgeting to divert funds from an economic development program into a different section, arguing that such additions should be made in their proper budget sections.
S14
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker states that the amendment is necessary because state statute requires reimbursement of county attorney salaries, implying failure to act now will result in payment later.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker encourages a favorable vote because he believes the program is good and will help educate students in rural areas like Sheridan.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it is the result of extensive negotiations between the university and local foundations to expand outreach programs.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports shifting funds from a gym renovation to the engineering building because it was higher on the university's priority list and has not been prioritized for years.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because he believes athletics are essential for advancing academics and bringing prestige to the university, even though engineering is more important.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes a simple phone call could determine costs for athletic programs without needing an expensive feasibility study funded by taxpayers.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
45 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
85 stored
Adopted Standing Committee by H02
Adopted 2nd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Failed 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Failed 2nd reading by COE
Adopted 2nd reading by VON FLATER
Adopted 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Adopted 2nd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Failed 2nd reading by CASE
Adopted 2nd reading by HASTERT
Failed 2nd reading by JENNINGS
Failed 2nd reading by ESQUIBEL,F
Adopted 2nd reading by LANDEN
Failed 2nd reading by LANDEN
Failed 2nd reading by MEIER
Corrected 2nd reading by NUTTING
Adopted, Corrected 2nd reading by NUTTING
Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by NUTTING
Adopted 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Adopted 2nd reading by SCOTT
Adopted 2nd reading by SCOTT
Failed 2nd reading by MARTIN
Adopted 2nd reading by BEBOUT
Corrected 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by MARTIN
Filed 2nd reading by CASE
Adopted, Corrected 2nd reading by CASE
Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by CASE
Failed 2nd reading by MEIER
Failed 2nd reading by COOPER
Failed 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Withdrawn 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Failed 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Adopted 2nd reading by VON FLATER
Adopted 2nd reading by BEBOUT
Adopted 2nd reading by EMERICH
Failed 2nd reading by HICKS
Failed 2nd reading by HICKS
Filed 2nd reading by ROTHFUSS
Adopted, Corrected 2nd reading by ROTHFUSS
Adopted, Corrected 2nd reading by ROTHFUSS
Filed 2nd reading by HASTERT
Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by HASTERT
Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by HASTERT
Filed 3rd reading by COE
Adopted, Corrected 3rd reading by COE
Adopted, Corrected 3rd reading by COE
Adopted 3rd reading by MEIER
Withdrawn 3rd reading by BEBOUT
Failed 3rd reading by ROTHFUSS
Failed 3rd reading by MEIER
Adopted 3rd reading by VON FLATER
Adopted 3rd reading by SCOTT
Withdrawn 3rd reading by PERKINS
Failed 3rd reading by MEIER
Adopted 3rd reading by ROTHFUSS
Failed 3rd reading by NUTTING
Adopted 3rd reading by PERKINS
Adopted 3rd reading by CHRISTENSE
Filed 3rd reading by BEBOUT
Failed, Corrected 3rd reading by BEBOUT
Failed, Corrected 3rd reading by BEBOUT
Failed 3rd reading by MEIER
Adopted 3rd reading by BEBOUT
Adopted 3rd reading by NUTTING
Failed, Corrected 3rd reading by ESQUIBEL,F
Withdrawn 3rd reading by SCHIFFER
Adopted 3rd reading by PETERSON
Adopted 3rd reading by DRISKILL
Adopted 3rd reading by SCOTT
Failed 3rd reading by PERKINS
Failed 3rd reading by PERKINS
Adopted 3rd reading by PERKINS
Adopted 3rd reading by DRISKILL
Adopted 3rd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Adopted 3rd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Withdrawn 3rd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Adopted, Corrected 3rd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Adopted 3rd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Withdrawn 3rd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Adopted 3rd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Adopted 3rd reading by ROTHFUSS
Withdrawn 3rd reading by BEBOUT
Failed 3rd reading by MARTIN