Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2012Enacted

SF0085

General permits.

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

A plain-English summary is not available yet.

Who it affects

Not clearly identified in the stored source.

Limits and unknowns

No additional limitations are listed.

Official record

Sources

Source attached

Official summary

SF0085 Bill No.: SF0085 Drafter: MDO LSO No.: 12LSO-0257 Effective Date: March 23, 2012 Enrolled Act No.: SEA0059 Chapter No.: CH0109 Prime Sponsor: Joint Minerals, Business and Economic Development Interim Committee Catch Title: General permits. Subject: Environmental Quality Summary/Major Elements: A general permit is a permit for a defined geographic area which regulates the discharge or emission of certain defined categories of substances into the environment. To discharge or emit under a general permit, a regulated entity will file a "notice of intent" with DEQ. DEQ will either issue an "authorization" to emit or discharge or will deny authority to discharge or emit under the general permit. Currently, DEQ issues general permits to discharge under the Air Quality provisions of Title 35, Chapter 11, Article 2 or the Water Quality provisions of Title 35, Chapter 11, Article 3. This act specifies that a general permit issued by the DEQ is not a "rule" for purposes of the Wyoming Administrative Procedures Act. Further provides that general permits shall be issued solely in accordance with procedures set forth by regulation adopted by the EQC, which shall include public notice and opportunity to commit on the general permits. Authorizations to use general permits shall be available for public comment for 30 days. This act specifies that any aggrieved party may challenge the authorization to discharge or emit under a general permit as provided in the Environmental Quality Act.

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 7, 5:39 PM

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker argues that the House amendment introduced uncertainty and risked losing a bill essential for mosquito control permits, urging support to ensure citizens are not left without protection.

Public statementFloor statement at 26:14 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The speaker explains that after discussion with House members, they backed off from their amendment. Consequently, the bill will proceed exactly as it left the Senate.

Public statementFloor statement at 19:34 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes concurring because general permits for water discharge could pollute groundwater without allowing affected individuals to object. He urges sending the bill back to conference to preserve public participation features.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:29:49 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker urges sticking with the Senate's original position and sending the bill to conference because he believes the version returning from the House is in worse shape than when it left.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:31:36 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports sending the bill back for further discussion because he views the change regarding public comment as a huge issue that needs to be addressed.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:32:35 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports concurring because the bill protects existing permits from legal challenges and ensures public comment remains available through the rulemaking process.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:33:58 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports an amendment to allow public comment and appeals because a general permit's 'one size fits all' approach may not work in diverse areas, requiring a mechanism for aggrieved parties with direct stakes to challenge it.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:52:20 Watch the statement

Cale Case

R · S25

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker proposes a sunset clause because the bill needs more time to be refined in areas where general permits may not work due to unique geologic and drainage conditions across the state.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:02:11 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the sunset amendment as a necessary check to ensure due diligence and revisit potential unintended consequences of the general permitting system in two years.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:05:24 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because adding a sunset sends a message of hesitation to courts and litigants, potentially undermining the goal of keeping DEQ operational without legal challenges.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:07:11 Watch the statement

Larry Hicks

R · S11

Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it addresses a problem that does not exist; if the permitting process fails, court decisions will naturally force legislative review.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:08:30 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because sunsets are unnecessary; if the bill is unworkable, the legislature can simply introduce a new fix in the future.

Public statementFloor statement at 2:08:56 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker explains that a court challenge created uncertainty and expense for general permits, so this bill clarifies definitions and adds public comment procedures to address the court's concerns while maintaining an efficient permitting process.

Public statementFloor statement at 27:47 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

10 roll calls

H Adopted JCC01 49-8-3-0-02012-03-08 · House49 yes 8 no
S Adopted JCC01 30-0-0-0-02012-03-07 · Senate30 yes 0 no
S Did Not Concur 12-17-1-0-02012-03-06 · Senate12 yes 17 no
H Passed 3rd Reading 41-17-2-0-02012-03-05 · House41 yes 17 no
H Reconsidered 41-17-2-0-02012-03-05 · House41 yes 17 no
H Failed 3rd Reading 26-32-2-0-02012-03-05 · House26 yes 32 no
H09 Recommended Do Pass 8-1-0-0-02012-02-24 · House8 yes 1 no
S Passed 3rd Reading 26-4-0-0-02012-02-22 · Senate26 yes 4 no
S09 Recommended Do Pass 5-0-0-0-02012-02-17 · Senate5 yes 0 no
S Introduced and Referred to S09 24-6-0-0-02012-02-16 · Senate24 yes 6 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. Assigned Chapter NumberLSO
  2. Governor Signed SEA0059Governor
  3. H Speaker Signed SEA No. 0059House
  4. S President Signed SEA No. 0059Senate
  5. Assigned Number SEA0059LSO
  6. H Adopted SF0085JC01House
  7. S Adopted SF0085JC01Senate
  8. H Appointed JCC01 MembersHouse
  9. S Appointed JCC01 MembersSenate
  10. S Did Not ConcurSenate
  11. S Received for ConcurrenceSenate
  12. H Passed 3rd ReadingHouse
  13. H ReconsideredHouse
  14. H Failed 3rd ReadingHouse
  15. H Passed 2nd ReadingHouse
  16. H Passed CoWHouse
  17. H Amendments AdoptedHouse
  18. Amendment AdoptedHouse
  19. Amendment FailedHouse
  20. H Placed on General FileHouse

Changes

Amendments

4 stored

SF0085HW001

Failed Committee of the Whole by GINGERY

SF0085HW002

Adopted Committee of the Whole by THRONE

SF0085S3001

Adopted 3rd reading by SCHIFFER

SF0085S3002

Failed 3rd reading by CASE