General government appropriations-2.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 6:05 AM
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the specific language in the amendment regarding shopping for another university, arguing it is arrogant and unrealistic given that other states are also seeking medical school seats.
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure certainty for the tribal liaison program and maintain good relations with Native American populations in his district.
S23
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because school districts are facing financial strain and inflationary pressures, requiring a higher cost-of-living adjustment than what was recommended by the Joint Appropriations Committee.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes paying for a tribal liaison by comparing tribes to sovereign nations like Canada that do not receive such payments, arguing citizens of Wyoming are entitled to state services without this specific arrangement.
S18
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because his experience in the fire department showed that older students are physically capable of performing CPR. He also cites personal involvement with a medical foundation where AEDs saved lives as evidence for supporting student training.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges a yes vote on the amendment by pointing out that senators are in the highest probability category for needing CPR and suggesting that voting yes could save their own lives.
R · S16
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the amendment to limit the reporting period for federal compliance to the current biennium (2013-2014) rather than extending it back to 2009, which would create unnecessary complications.
Why they voted this way
The speaker opposes funding this program again without first receiving measurable results or deliverables from the previous million dollars spent to ensure accountability before providing more money.
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the amendment because health information exchange directly saved a friend by having medical records available immediately upon arrival at an out-of-state hospital, demonstrating its life-saving value.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because he believes it properly distributes funds without obligating the state to spend money that may not materialize.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it increases transparency regarding capital gains by placing them in a specific account where their status is known before decisions are made.
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the amendment to delete language requiring Social Security numbers for tracking mental health clients because it poses a severe risk to patient confidentiality and could negatively impact their future employment.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports deleting the footnote because it is internally contradictory regarding how Medicaid and general funds are accounted for in mental health services.
S03
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the amendment to delete the Social Security number requirement because there are alternative methods, such as generating a personal identification number, that can prevent double billing without compromising privacy.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it bypasses the Joint Appropriations Committee, violating the required legislative process for agency requests.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes it is unfair to change the distribution formula at this late stage after the Joint Appropriations Committee has already worked on a solution.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because the program was new and had not yet been given a full opportunity to realize its potential benefits in areas lacking adjunct faculty.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports restoring funding because the program has been immensely successful in helping teachers obtain credentials to teach college-level courses.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports removing funding for corridor beautification because he believes it is a waste of time and should be handled by YDOT, towns, and cities instead.
S26
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes restoring IT funding because the university receives a large block grant and should prioritize this expense within their existing budget rather than asking for additional appropriations.
R · S16
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because they heard requests to include ANI for their expertise and to develop a strategy, which this addition addresses.
D · S09
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports moving unexpended AML funds to engineering and arts programs because the money is currently at risk in the U.S. Treasury if not obligated, and it aligns with the original intent of the program.
S13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe using AML funds to cover college operating deficits is poor fiscal discipline and that the money should be reserved for specific energy industry projects.
S13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports separating specific program funding from the block grant to ensure legislative priorities like engineering and medical programs are protected from being cut.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because it saves money by directing funds into endowments that require matching donations, effectively doubling the impact and reducing future demands on general funds.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because recidivism rates for the targeted programs are too high, and he wants to require a new plan before committing full funding.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure the governor acts as a gatekeeper for large project funds, preventing situations where communities present projects that do not meet the criteria for 'big fish' investments.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports requiring an Attorney General opinion before loan transactions to ensure deals are constitutional and avoid having to reconstruct agreements after the business council has already approved them.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports adding an appropriation to cover potential costs for exonerated individuals, noting it is appropriate and prevents higher settlement costs if the state is sued.
S13
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker believes forbidding public access via a budget amendment is not an appropriate solution, though they support optimizing access in future negotiations.
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the amendment because it redirects unused funds from a University of Wyoming study to be used for rare earth purposes, which they believe is a good use of money previously authorized in the 2012 budget.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues against using state resources to pay off prior debts because it rewards bad management without addressing future operational issues.
R · S27
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker urges adoption of the amendment to provide protection against potential disasters involving hospitals facing inadequate operating expenses.
R · S30
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the amendment because it removes a footnote that restricts funding for early intervention services, which saves school districts money by preventing children from needing special education later.
S14
Why they voted this way
The speaker opposes the amendment because he believes search and rescue funding should come from existing sources like fishing licenses rather than adding a new program to this budget.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The speaker supports the measure because rural hospitals in his district are struggling with bad debt from unpaid medical bills, and he believes this action addresses that financial threat.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because tourism is a major economic driver for Main Street businesses, citing successful results from similar programs in other states.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports removing a footnote because it imposes an unrealistic enrollment increase target and potential liability on the university.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
57 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
98 stored
Adopted Standing Committee by H02
Filed 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Adopted, Corrected 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Failed 2nd reading by VON FLATER
Adopted 2nd reading by EMERICH
Failed 2nd reading by VON FLATER
Adopted 2nd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Adopted 2nd reading by HASTERT
Adopted 2nd reading by BURNS
Adopted 2nd reading by ROTHFUSS
Adopted 2nd reading by HICKS
Failed 2nd reading by HASTERT
Adopted 2nd reading by COE
Adopted 2nd reading by COE
Adopted 2nd reading by BEBOUT
Adopted 2nd reading by VON FLATER
Adopted 2nd reading by CRAFT
Failed 2nd reading by SCOTT
Failed 2nd reading by ESQUIBEL,F
Failed 2nd reading by PETERSON
Failed 2nd reading by SCOTT
Withdrawn 2nd reading by ROTHFUSS
Withdrawn 2nd reading by SCOTT
Adopted 2nd reading by VON FLATER
Failed 2nd reading by MEIER
Adopted 2nd reading by DRISKILL
Adopted 2nd reading by BEBOUT
Adopted 2nd reading by BEBOUT
Failed 2nd reading by HICKS
Adopted 2nd reading by DOCKSTADER
Adopted 2nd reading by PERKINS
Adopted 2nd reading by BEBOUT
Failed 2nd reading by LANDEN
Failed 2nd reading by COE
Failed 2nd reading by HASTERT
Failed 2nd reading by BEBOUT
Withdrawn 2nd reading by BEBOUT
Adopted, Corrected 2nd reading by BEBOUT
Adopted 2nd reading by BEBOUT
Adopted 2nd reading by ANDRSON,JD
Adopted 2nd reading by BEBOUT
Adopted 2nd reading by COE
Filed 2nd reading by COE
Failed, Corrected 2nd reading by COE
Failed 2nd reading by COE
Adopted 2nd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Adopted 2nd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Withdrawn 2nd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Adopted 2nd reading by ROTHFUSS
Adopted 2nd reading by ROTHFUSS
Adopted 2nd reading by ROTHFUSS
Adopted 2nd reading by ROTHFUSS
Failed 2nd reading by ROTHFUSS
Adopted, Corrected 2nd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Failed 2nd reading by SCOTT
Adopted 2nd reading by DOCKSTADER
Failed 2nd reading by HASTERT
Adopted 2nd reading by MEIER
Failed 2nd reading by COOPER
Failed 2nd reading by SCOTT
Failed 2nd reading by SCHIFFER
Adopted 2nd reading by ANDRSON,JL
Adopted 2nd reading by SCOTT
Adopted 3rd reading by HASTERT
Adopted 3rd reading by SCOTT
Failed 3rd reading by ROTHFUSS
Adopted 3rd reading by DOCKSTADER
Adopted 3rd reading by EMERICH
Adopted 3rd reading by BEBOUT
Adopted 3rd reading by JOHNSON
Adopted 3rd reading by BEBOUT
Adopted 3rd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Adopted 3rd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Adopted 3rd reading by BEBOUT
Failed 3rd reading by SCHIFFER
Adopted 3rd reading by SCOTT
Adopted 3rd reading by BEBOUT
Adopted 3rd reading by LANDEN
Adopted 3rd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Failed 3rd reading by LANDEN
Adopted 3rd reading by SCHIFFER
Adopted 3rd reading by DOCKSTADER
Adopted 3rd reading by SCOTT
Failed 3rd reading by CASE
Failed 3rd reading by LANDEN
Failed 3rd reading by ROTHFUSS
Failed 3rd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Adopted 3rd reading by NICHOLAS,P
Adopted 3rd reading by BEBOUT
Adopted 3rd reading by BEBOUT
Failed 3rd reading by SCHIFFER
Adopted 3rd reading by PETERSON
Failed 3rd reading by ROTHFUSS
Adopted 3rd reading by PETERSON
Adopted 3rd reading by PETERSON
Failed 3rd reading by ROTHFUSS
Failed 3rd reading by ROTHFUSS