Back to Wyoming
Wyoming2015Did Not Pass

SF0123

Collective bargaining for fire fighters.

Last scannedAug 25, 2026, 2:25 AM

In one sentence

A plain-English summary is not available yet.

Who it affects

Not clearly identified in the stored source.

Limits and unknowns

No additional limitations are listed.

Official record

Sources

Source attached

Public statements

Why lawmakers voted

Last checked Aug 7, 4:10 AM

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes Amendment No. 2 because using actuarial assumptions based on age could lead to valid age discrimination complaints, making the amendment unworkable.

Public statementFloor statement at 54:48 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports Amendment No. 3 because it addresses the specific concerns raised by constituents regarding binding arbitration for firefighter personal safety equipment.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:02:09 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker argues that the current system has worked well for fifty years without statewide problems, so there is no need to fix something that isn't broken.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:16:12 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker states he will vote against the bill because it has not moved far enough toward a fair middle ground for both firefighters and cities.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:18:21 Watch the statement
Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker urges rejection of the legislation to allow for further interim work that could produce a better compromise addressing safety and other raised issues.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:23:59 Watch the statement

Bill Landen

R · S27

Voted No

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because he has not received sufficient support from city officials and constituents back home to feel comfortable voting for it.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:24:43 Watch the statement
Voted Yes

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill because he believes it strikes the right balance by preserving collective bargaining rights while ensuring governing bodies remain accountable to voters on economic issues.

Public statementFloor statement at 1:31:02 Watch the statement

If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.

Wyoming roll calls

Recorded votes

4 roll calls

S 3rd Reading:Failed 14-13-3-0-02015-02-05 · Senate14 yes 13 no
S 3rd Reading:Failed 13-14-3-0-02015-02-04 · Senate13 yes 14 no
S 3rd Reading:Bill reconsideration motion passed by roll call 17-10-3-0-02015-02-04 · Senate17 yes 10 no
Minerals:Recommend Do Pass 4-1-0-0-02015-01-30 · Senate4 yes 1 no

Official activity

Bill history

  1. S 3rd Reading:Failed 13-14-3-0-0Senate
  2. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  3. Amendment AdoptedSenate
  4. Amendment was withdrawn before voteSenate
  5. Amendment failedSenate
  6. S 3rd Reading:Bill reconsideration motion passed by roll call 17-10-3-0-0Senate
  7. S 3rd Reading:Failed 13-14-3-0Senate
  8. S 2nd Reading:PassedSenate
  9. S COW:PassedSenate
  10. S Placed on General FileSenate
  11. Minerals:Recommend Do Pass 4-1-0-0-0Senate
  12. Rerefer to S09 - Minerals
  13. S Introduced and Referred to S07 - CorporationsSenate
  14. S Received for IntroductionSenate
  15. Bill Number AssignedLSO

Changes

Amendments

4 stored

SF0123S3001

Failed 3rd reading by Meier

SF0123S3002

Withdrawn 3rd reading by Meier

SF0123S3003

Adopted 3rd reading by Kinskey

SF0123S3004

Adopted 3rd reading by Bebout