Post-conviction actual innocence.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 7, 12:39 AM
S03
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes lowering the evidentiary standard to 'reasonable probability' because they believe it is too low and could result in an excessive number of new trials.
S04
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because they believe it weakens the bill by removing protections that limit state liability, based on their experience with similar legislation.
R · S11
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment, stating it effectively destroys the original joint committee bill by being driven solely by an advocacy group's interests.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because removing the liability waiver allows exonerees to sue the state in addition to receiving compensation, which they view as a negative outcome for the bill's structure.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports adding an appropriation to ensure there is funding available for compensation, arguing that without money behind the obligation, the bill's provisions would be meaningless.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe existing civil rights actions provide better financial recovery for innocent individuals, making this specific compensation fund unnecessary.
R · S28
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because they fear it could allow individuals who are not actually innocent to receive compensation by exploiting procedural loopholes rather than proving innocence.
If a lawmaker is not listed, we couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
4 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
2 stored
Failed Standing Committee by SJudiciary
Adopted Standing Committee by SAppropriations