SF0001

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment, arguing that legislators should not concede immediately and must maintain a strong negotiating position.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to provide flexibility for selecting an automotive technology school path and ensuring a fall start date, which is vital for economic diversification.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to study increasing insurance deductibles because it could generate cost savings and encourage employees to avoid unnecessary medical visits.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports an amendment clarifying language on data reporting because it ensures that potential cost savings and efficiency recommendations are explicitly identified in the annual report.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it allows a specific local creek project affected by coal mining history to access reclamation funds that were previously unavailable due to technical eligibility issues.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because he has observed that the creek smells very bad due to water dumped from an original mine, indicating a pressing need for remediation.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he does not know which other projects would be displaced by prioritizing this one and believes agencies should manage their own priorities without legislative micromanagement.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes funding the agency for one year too long is unnecessary given his view on its performance issues.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes eliminating or reducing funding for the agency, arguing that if it is failing to represent consumers effectively due to statutory limitations, the solution should be fixing the statutes rather than removing the advocate.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment as a one-year funding measure to prompt improved performance and accountability from the agency in rate cases.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to prevent sportsman-generated funds from being used for game bird farming, citing previous agreements and a governor's letter.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because the same issues that led to its previous defeat still apply.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment, arguing it is premature since they will have a better understanding of funding needs next year when they reconvene.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to provide a safety gap for air service and prevent TSA from leaving communities like Sheridan due to funding interruptions.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure funds are available now so contracts can be extended in January or February without a gap where airlines must rely on promises of future funding.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to ensure adequate representation and improve the relationship with the Wind River Indian Reservation by placing liaison positions under direct gubernatorial control.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to better understand potential losses in ad valorem and severance taxes caused by natural gas flaring at oil wells.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it restores the School Facilities Commission's recommendations, preventing legislators from engaging in political debates over which schools should be prioritized.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes a restriction because it risks micromanaging wildlife operations and could inadvertently stop efforts approved by sportsmen.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he believes funding component-level projects in old schools is irrational and economically unsound, as it lowers facility scores without addressing critical needs like safety or capacity.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because he views it as a political contrivance that does not represent an objective solution to school facility needs.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because they believe transportation costs are not being handled responsibly and that necessary basic steps have not been taken.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports making tough decisions for the state's budget as a long-term solution rather than delaying action.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment to prevent elementary schools from being condemned due to lack of funding, citing a personal experience where his district's alternative school was forced into rented space after failing to receive improvements.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because she believes throwing small amounts of money at old schools is insufficient and fails to address critical safety concerns like security in aging facilities.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because she believes it continues to game a broken system by pushing schools down the priority list with minor funding rather than solving their underlying problems.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment as a prudent measure because he believes revenue forecasts are overly optimistic given current natural gas prices, which could lead to deficits if spending is not reduced.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment by comparing the state's financial situation to driving an old car that cannot afford new repairs, suggesting they must maintain current assets rather than fund new capital projects.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because it would eliminate funding for specific school projects including planning money, demolition of old schools, and a track in the smallest district.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it is revenue neutral and restores funding that was previously removed within an existing block grant.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the amendment because there is significant pressure on school funding and a large deficit, making it an inappropriate time to consider vouchers.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the amendment because it uses federal mineral royalties to intercept funds not dedicated to education, which improves constitutionality and addresses a funding crisis.