Possession of nonplant form marihuana.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 6, 4:46 PM
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker argues that defendants should be allowed to prove via product labels or testing that the THC content in non-plant forms does not exceed misdemeanor thresholds, noting this is a matter of common sense.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the amendment because current laboratory technology lacks the legal standard of consistency required to accurately measure THC in processed marijuana products for court.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the amendment because charging individuals with a felony for possessing THC edibles creates lifelong consequences that are disproportionate to the offense, especially given available testing technology.
Wyoming roll calls
5 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
2 stored
Filed Standing Committee by HJudiciary
Failed 3rd reading by Case