Private property rights-National Historic Preservation Act.
In one sentence
Not clearly identified in the stored source.
No additional limitations are listed.
Official record
Public statements
Last checked Aug 6, 5:05 PM
R · S25
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because he questions its necessity and believes it is based on less than 5% of interactions with the National Historic Preservation Act, which generally works well through collaboration.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill to address federal delays on drilling applications caused by historical preservation concerns, even when operations are strictly on private ground.
R · S02
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker supports the bill as a necessary measure to correct federal government abuses and confusion under the National Historic Preservation Act that are holding up permits and costing the state revenue.
Why they voted this way
The lawmaker opposes the bill because he believes it accomplishes nothing and that a resolution would be more appropriate for sending a message about agency conduct.
S03
Why they voted this way
The speaker argues that federal regulations under the National Historic Preservation Act are applied incorrectly to private property, hindering economic development and energy projects in Wyoming. They believe this bill is necessary to balance rights and encourage better implementation of these rules by field offices.
Wyoming roll calls
3 roll calls
Official activity
Changes
1 stored
Corrected, Adopted 2nd reading by Boner