Wyoming2025Did Not Pass
SF0115
Limiting Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Last scannedOct 14, 2026, 2:19 AM
In one sentence
The bill sets rules for when people can ask courts to review decisions made by government agencies.
What it does
- Changes the law about when a person can go to court if they disagree with an agency's decision or action, requiring that all administrative remedies be used before going to court.
- Limits judicial review of actions related to public employment unless it is a final decision in a contested case or provided by other laws.
- Specifies where the district court for judicial review should be located based on where the injury occurred, the agency's action took place, or where the affected person resides.
Who it affects
- People who want to challenge decisions made by government agencies in court.
- Government agencies whose actions may be reviewed by courts.
- Courts that handle cases involving judicial review of agency actions.
Limits and unknowns
- The bill did not pass during the session.
- It only applies to actions taken by agencies on or after July 1, 2025, if it were to become law.
- The exact impact on public employment cases is limited and depends on additional legal provisions.
Plain language
Terms to know
- Judicial Review
- The process where a court examines and evaluates the decisions made by government agencies to ensure they are legal and fair.
- Contested Case
- A situation in which an agency makes a decision that affects someone's rights or interests, and that person can challenge it through formal procedures.
Official record
Sources
Public statements
Why lawmakers voted
Last checked Aug 5, 3:22 AM
Couldn't find a published reason.
Wyoming roll calls
Recorded votes
3 roll calls
H01 - Judiciary:Recommend Do Pass 5-4-0-0-02025-02-24 · House5 yes 4 no
- Yes
- 5
- No
- 4
- Absent
- 0
- Excused
- 0
- Conflict
- 0
S 3rd Reading:Passed 30-0-1-0-02025-01-30 · Senate30 yes 0 no
- Yes
- 30
- No
- 0
- Absent
- 0
- Excused
- 1
- Conflict
- 0
Yes 30
Barry CragoR · S22Bill LandenR · S27Bob IdeR · S29Bo BitemanR · S21Brian BonerR · S02Cale CaseR · S25Charles ScottR · S30Cheri SteinmetzR · S03Chris RothfussD · S09Dan DockstaderR · S16Dan LaursenR · S19Ed CooperR · S20Eric BarlowR · S23Evie BrennanR · S31Gary CrumR · S10Jared OlsenR · S08Jim AndersonR · S28John KolbR · S12Larry HicksR · S11Laura PearsonR · S14Lynn HutchingsR · S05Mike GierauD · S17Ogden DriskillR · S01Stacy JonesR · S13Stephan PappasR · S07Tara NethercottR · S04Tim FrenchR · S18Tim SalazarR · S26Troy McKeownR · S24Wendy SchulerR · S15
Excused 1
S01 - Judiciary:Recommend Do Pass 4-0-1-0-02025-01-24 · Senate4 yes 0 no
- Yes
- 4
- No
- 0
- Absent
- 0
- Excused
- 1
- Conflict
- 0
Official activity
Bill history
- H COW:H Did not consider for COWHouse
- H Placed on General FileHouse
- H01 - Judiciary:Recommend Do Pass 5-4-0-0-0House
- H Introduced and Referred to H01 - JudiciaryHouse
- H Received for IntroductionHouse
- S 3rd Reading:Passed 30-0-1-0-0Senate
- S 2nd Reading:PassedSenate
- S COW:PassedSenate
- S Placed on General FileSenate
- S01 - Judiciary:Recommend Do Pass 4-0-1-0-0Senate
- S Introduced and Referred to S01 - JudiciarySenate
- S Received for IntroductionSenate
- Bill Number AssignedLSO