SF0178

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker questions whether mandatory retention should be decided by schools alone, arguing that parents must have a say in holding their children back. She also expresses concern that the statewide testing used may not accurately measure reading skills and notes a lack of resources to empower teachers.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because it includes punitive measures for teachers regarding fraud, which he finds unnecessary. He also argues that mandatory retention infringes on parental rights and believes parents should decide if a child repeats a grade.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker expresses concern that the bill allows districts to enforce reading plans without parental consent, which she feels undermines necessary collaboration between parents and schools. She also notes the bill is overly complicated.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker supports the bill as a necessary reform to stop socially promoting students who cannot read, arguing that current policies are failing too many children. He emphasizes the need for parental involvement and teacher training.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because he believes it adds unnecessary bureaucracy rather than fixing problems, despite appreciating its intent to improve reading.

Why they voted this way

The lawmaker opposes the bill because schools are already fatigued by constant legislative efforts to tweak education, and he believes this issue requires deeper committee work done in cooperation with districts.