Electric Utilities; review by Public Service Commission of certain contracts with large load customers further provided
Electric Utilities; review by Public Service Commission of certain contracts with large load customers further provided
Taxes
Passed Legislature
This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.
Sponsor
Rafferty
Last action
2026-03-17
Official status
Passed by House of Origin
Effective date
Not listed
Plain English Breakdown
Checked against official source text during the last sync.
Electric Utilities; Public Service Commission Reviews Large Customer Contracts
This bill requires the Alabama Public Service Commission to review and approve contracts between electric utilities and large load customers, ensuring these contracts cover incremental costs and provide benefits for other utility users.
What This Bill Does
Adds a new section to Alabama's code that defines 'incremental costs' as additional expenses related to serving large load data center customers, including fuel costs and taxes.
Defines a 'large load customer' as someone who needs at least 100 megawatts of electricity from the utility.
Requires the Public Service Commission to review contracts between utilities and large load customers to ensure they cover incremental costs.
Specifies that these contracts must also provide benefits for other utility users, such as lower costs or improved efficiency.
Who It Names or Affects
Electric utilities in Alabama
Large load data center customers who need at least 100 megawatts of electricity
The Public Service Commission
Terms To Know
Incremental Costs
Extra costs a utility incurs to serve large load customers, including fuel and taxes.
Large Load Customer
A customer who needs at least 100 megawatts of electricity from the utility.
Limits and Unknowns
The bill does not specify how the Public Service Commission will enforce these requirements.
It is unclear what happens if a contract does not meet the criteria set by the commission.
Amendments
These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.
Plain English: QNGTN14-1 03/12/2026 JWB (L)JWB 2026-729 SUB HB403
RAFFERTY SUBSTITUTE TO HB403
OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE RAFFERTY
Page 1
SYNOPSIS:
Under existing law, the Public Service
Commission reviews retail electric service contracts
between utilities and large load customers.
QNGTN14-1 03/12/2026 JWB (L)JWB 2026-729 SUB HB403
RAFFERTY SUBSTITUTE TO HB403
OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE RAFFERTY
Page 1
SYNOPSIS:
Under existing law, the Public Service
Commission reviews retail electric service contracts
between utilities and large load customers.
The
commission approves these contracts if the commission
finds that the contracts are in the public interest.
This bill would provide that when the commission
is making the determination whether a contract between
a utility and a large load customer is in the public
interest, the commission must take into account certain
considerations, including whether the contract will
provide for the recovery from the large load customer
of incremental costs that are attributable to the large
load customer and that the contract will promote
positive benefits for other residential, commercial,
and industrial utility customers.
A BILL
TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
Relating to utilities; to add Section 37-4-22.1 to the
Code of Alabama 1975; to provide specific considerations for
the Public Service Commission's review and approval of retail
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2
the Public Service Commission's review and approval of retail
electric service contracts between a utility and a large load
customer, including determining that such contracts provide
for the recovery of incremental costs and promote other
positive benefits.
This amendment summary is using official source text because generated interpretation was skipped for this run.
Bill History
2026-03-17House
Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass as Amended - Adopted Roll Call 947 (Yeas 104, Nays 0)
2026-03-17House
Motion to Adopt - Adopted Roll Call 946 (Yeas 104, Nays 0)
2026-03-17House
Third Reading in House of Origin (Yeas 103, Nays 1)
2026-03-17House
Engrossed
2026-03-17House
Rafferty 1st Substitute Offered
2026-02-10House
Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar
2026-02-10House
Reported Out of Committee House of Origin
2026-02-05House
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin
2026-02-05House
Read for the first time and referred to the House Committee on Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure
Official Summary Text
Electric Utilities; review by Public Service Commission of certain contracts with large load customers further provided
Current Bill Text
Read the full stored bill text
HB403 ENGROSSED
Page 0
HB403
QNGTN14-2
By Representatives Rafferty, Hulsey, Tillman
RFD: Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure
First Read: 05-Feb-26
1
2
3
4
5
HB403 Engrossed
Page 1
First Read: 05-Feb-26
A BILL
TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
Relating to utilities; to add Section 37-4-22.1 to the
Code of Alabama 1975; to provide specific considerations for
the Public Service Commission's review and approval of retail
electric service contracts between a utility and a large load
customer, including determining that such contracts provide
for the recovery of incremental costs and promote other
positive benefits.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF ALABAMA:
Section 1. Section 37-4-22.1 is added to the Code of
Alabama 1975, to read as follows:
§37-4-22.1
(a) For purposes of this section, the following terms
have the following meanings:
(1) INCREMENTAL COSTS OF RETAIL ELECTRIC SERVICE. The
additional costs associated with the generation, transmission,
distribution, sale, or furnishing of electricity to a large
load data center customer, including fuel costs and taxes,
which the utility would not incur but for the large load data
center customer contract.
(2) LARGE LOAD CUSTOMER. A customer of the utility
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HB403 Engrossed
Page 2
(2) LARGE LOAD CUSTOMER. A customer of the utility
which has executed a contract for retail electric service with
the utility which requires the utility to serve an expected
total peak demand of 100 megawatts or greater at one or more
contiguous parcels of land.
(3) TERMS AND CONDITIONS. The provisions in a contract
for service between a customer and utility which address
matters such as minimum term for contract length, upfront
payments, security and collateral, and minimum payment.
(b) For purposes of Section 37-4-22(b), a contract for
retail electric service between a utility and a person that
qualifies as a large load customer is consistent with the
public interest where the commission determines that the
contract pricing and contract terms and conditions over the
contract term are expected to:
(1) Provide for the recovery of the incremental costs
of retail electric service to the large load customer's
premises from the large load customer; and
(2) Promote positive benefits to other retail electric
customers of the utility.
(c) The determination of whether a contract between a
large load customer and a utility promotes positive benefits
under subdivision (b)(2) includes considerations such as:
(1) Whether the pricing and terms and conditions of the
contract could lower costs for other residential, commercial,
and industrial customers of the utility; and
(2) Whether the large load customer is expected to
increase the efficiency of the utility's power system.
Section 2. This act shall become effective on October
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
HB403 Engrossed
Page 3
Section 2. This act shall become effective on October
1, 2026.57
HB403 Engrossed
Page 4
1, 2026.
House of Representatives
Read for the first time and referred
to the House of Representatives
committee on Transportation,
Utilities and Infrastructure
................05-Feb-26
Read for the second time and placed
on the calendar:
0 amendments
................10-Feb-26
Read for the third time and passed
as amended
Yeas 104
Nays 0
Abstains 1
................17-Mar-26
John Treadwell
Clerk
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79