Read the full stored bill text
SB342 ENROLLED
Page 0
SB342
QNPE245-3
By Senator Chambliss
RFD: Finance and Taxation Education
First Read: 05-Mar-26
1
2
3
4
5
SB342 Enrolled
Page 1
First Read: 05-Mar-26
Enrolled, An Act,
Relating to educational choice; to add Section 16-6J-10
to the Code of Alabama 1975, to provide enforcement mechanisms
for the CHOOSE Act's prohibition of discrimination against
CHOOSE Act participating students with respect to eligibility
for K-12 interscholastic athletics; to provide a right of
action for CHOOSE Act participants for violations, regardless
of when the alleged violation occurred; to permit courts to
award reasonable attorney fees; and to provide for legislative
findings.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF ALABAMA:
Section 1. Section 16-6J-10 is added to the Code of
Alabama 1975, to read as follows:
§16-6J-10
(a) The Legislature finds and declares the following:
(1) The CHOOSE Act was enacted to expand educational
opportunity in Alabama and enhance the ability of Alabama
parents to choose the K-12 educational setting that best meets
the needs of their children.
(2) Recognizing the importance of interscholastic
athletics, the CHOOSE Act contains an athletic-eligibility
nondiscrimination provision that states, "Nothing in the
CHOOSE Act shall affect or change the athletic eligibility of
student athletes governed by the Alabama High School Athletic
Association or similar association."
(3) Interscholastic athletics are a vital part of a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SB342 Enrolled
Page 2
(3) Interscholastic athletics are a vital part of a
complete education, promoting teamwork, discipline,
leadership, personal growth, and community engagement.
Participation in interscholastic athletics, like participation
in other extracurricular activities, improves students'
academic performance, school engagement, and social outcomes.
(4) Denying CHOOSE Act participating students the
opportunity to participate in interscholastic athletics based
solely on his or her status as a CHOOSE Act participating
student undermines the CHOOSE Act's promise of meaningful
educational choice.
(5) It is essential to provide robust mechanisms to
enforce the CHOOSE Act's athletic-eligibility
nondiscrimination provision and otherwise ensure that a
student's CHOOSE Act status does not limit his or her ability
to participate in interscholastic athletics.
(b) For purposes of this section, the following terms
have the following meanings:
(1) CHOOSE ACT PARTICIPANT. A CHOOSE Act student, the
parent of such a student, or a participating school.
(2) CHOOSE ACT STUDENT. A participating student,
regardless of whether he or she has begun receiving services
from an education service provider.
(3) INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION. An
association that regulates interscholastic K-12 athletic
events, including the Alabama High School Athletic
Association, the Alabama Independent School Association, or
any similar association. The term also includes any of the
association's officers, agents, servants, employees, member
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
SB342 Enrolled
Page 3
association's officers, agents, servants, employees, member
institutions, and any other person working in concert with
them.
(c)(1) A CHOOSE Act participant may bring a civil
action against an interscholastic athletic association to
enjoin any of the following actions by an interscholastic
athletic association:
a. Adoption, enforcement, or implementation of a rule
or other policy or practice that limits or impedes
participation of a CHOOSE Act student in an athletic activity
when the determinative factor is his or her status as a CHOOSE
Act participating student. This paragraph does not preclude
rules, policies, or practices of an interscholastic athletic
association, including those governing academic eligibility,
transfers, or residency, that are applied without regard to
whether the student is a CHOOSE Act participating student.
b. Punishment of, or any adverse action against, a
CHOOSE Act participant for a CHOOSE Act student's
participation in an athletic activity pursuant to a court
order, even if the court order is later vacated, stayed,
reversed, or found to lack justification, if the court order
was issued pursuant to paragraph a. or to enforce the
prohibition in Section 16-6J-3(i) prohibiting discrimination
against CHOOSE Act students with respect to athletic
eligibility.
c. Retaliation against a CHOOSE Act participant for
advocacy or support of a CHOOSE Act student's participation in
an athletic activity pursuant to paragraph a. or Section
16-6J-3(i).
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
SB342 Enrolled
Page 4
16-6J-3(i).
(2) The following rules shall govern an action for
injunctive relief brought pursuant to this subsection:
a. The CHOOSE Act participant may seek a temporary
restraining order, preliminary injunction, permanent
injunction, or any combination thereof, pursuant to the
principles of equity governing such forms of relief, provided
a court shall prioritize allowing participation in an athletic
activity by a CHOOSE Act student over preservation of the
status quo.
b. Upon presenting sufficient evidence that an
interscholastic athletic association has taken or will likely
take an action enumerated in subdivision (1), a CHOOSE Act
participant shall be conclusively presumed to have established
irreparable harm, that the CHOOSE Act participant has no
adequate remedy at law, and that the requested injunction
would serve the public interest.
c. Upon presenting sufficient evidence that an
interscholastic athletic association has taken or will likely
take an action enumerated in subdivision (1), a CHOOSE Act
participant shall be presumed to have established that the
balance of the hardships favors issuance of an injunction
unless the interscholastic athletic association establishes
otherwise by clear and convincing evidence.
(3) Under this subsection, a court may award relief
regardless of when the action described in subdivision (1) was
taken by the interscholastic athletic association.
(d) In addition to any relief sought pursuant to
subsection (c), a CHOOSE Act participant may bring a civil
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
SB342 Enrolled
Page 5
subsection (c), a CHOOSE Act participant may bring a civil
action against an interscholastic athletic association to
recover the CHOOSE Act participant's actual economic damages
proximately caused by any action enumerated in subdivision
(c)(1) taken by the interscholastic athletic association,
provided such civil action shall be brought within two years
from the date of the action at issue.
(e) Venue for an action brought pursuant to this
section shall be proper in the circuit court of the county in
which the CHOOSE Act participant resides, attends school,
operates a school, or in the Circuit Court of Montgomery
County.
(f) In an action brought pursuant to this section, the
court may award costs and reasonable attorney fees to a
prevailing CHOOSE Act participant. The court may award costs
and reasonable attorney fees to a prevailing interscholastic
athletic association as provided in the Alabama Litigation
Accountability Act.
Section 2. This act shall become effective immediately.
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
SB342 Enrolled
Page 6
Section 2. This act shall become effective immediately.
________________________________________________
President and Presiding Officer of the Senate
________________________________________________
Speaker of the House of Representatives
SB342
Senate 31-Mar-26
I hereby certify that the within Act originated in and passed
the Senate, as amended.
Patrick Harris,
Secretary.
House of Representatives
Passed: 09-Apr-26
By: Senator Chambliss
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163