Back to Alabama

SB71 • 2026

Administrative rules; adopting environmental protection criteria stricter than federal requirements prohibited

Administrative rules; adopting environmental protection criteria stricter than federal requirements prohibited

Agriculture
Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Chesteen
Last action
2026-02-20
Official status
Enacted
Effective date
2026-02-19

Plain English Breakdown

The official text specifies this applies to numeric criteria for chemical substances, mixtures, contaminants, pollutants, hazardous substances, solid waste, and hazardous constituents related to drinking water, air quality, and waste handling. It does not explicitly cover non-numeric rules.

Limits on State Environmental Rules Stricter Than Federal Standards

This law stops state agencies from creating new environmental rules that are stricter than federal laws unless they meet strict scientific proof requirements.

What This Bill Does

  • Prohibits state agencies from adopting or changing rules with numeric limits on pollutants if those limits are more strict than federal standards for the same topic.
  • Requires any new rule without a matching federal standard to be based on 'best available science' and the 'weight of scientific evidence.'
  • Mandates that rules protecting human health must show a direct link between exposure to a substance and actual physical harm in humans.
  • Allows agencies to use animal or cell studies instead of human data only if the results can be scientifically applied to predict harm in people.
  • Stops agencies from using values from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System as their default for water quality rules.

Who It Names or Affects

  • State government agencies that create administrative rules regarding environmental protection.
  • Entities subject to state regulations on drinking water, air quality, hazardous waste, and contaminated site cleanup.
  • Agencies currently using federal risk data as a default standard for their own numeric limits.

Terms To Know

Best Available Science
Reliable, unbiased scientific information that has been independently verified and uses accepted methods to ensure quality and objectivity.
Manifest Bodily Harm
A physical disease or injury that is currently existing and can be diagnosed, not just a risk of future illness or the presence of a substance in the body.
Weight of Scientific Evidence
An evaluation method where all relevant information is considered based on its quality, design, reliability, and transparency before making a decision.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The law does not apply to rules that are required by federal laws or regulations.
  • Agencies can still create rules that are less strict than federal standards or the same as them.
  • Emergency rules adopted under specific state code sections are exempt from these restrictions.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

L5NK7YA-1

R 443 • Stubbs

Adopted

Plain English: This amendment changes how environmental rules must prove that exposure to something causes harm by requiring a clear connection and using standard scientific methods.

  • The bill now requires proof of a direct cause-and-effect link between being exposed to something at or above certain levels and the resulting harm.
  • Any rule establishing this causal link must be based on generally accepted standards.
  • The amendment text is incomplete because it cuts off mid-sentence, so we do not know exactly what 'generally accepted' refers to or how the rest of the sentence ends.
  • Without more context from the full bill, it is unclear which specific environmental rules these changes apply to.
HG5ZL88-1

R 444 • Stubbs

Adopted

Plain English: This amendment updates a list in an existing law to include rules from two specific state agencies.

  • The text adds the Department of Agriculture and Industries to a list of government bodies.
  • The provided text only shows one small change on page 6, so it is unclear how this affects the rest of the bill or what other rules might be included.
  • Without seeing the full original law (Code of Alabama 1975), we cannot explain exactly why these agencies are being added to that specific list.
HGVT266-1

R 445 • Stubbs

Adopted

Plain English: This amendment adds a specific exception to the bill, allowing rules that lower exposure to substances known or suspected to cause cancer.

  • The amendment creates an exception for rules designed to reduce human exposure to certain dangerous chemicals.
  • The text only shows a small section of the bill, so it is unclear how this new rule fits with other parts of the law.
  • It does not explain exactly which agencies or groups are allowed to create these rules under the exception.
TBXN415-1

R 206 • Chesteen

Adopted

Plain English: This amendment changes the rules so that state agencies cannot use stricter environmental standards than federal ones by default and must update their water quality rules within nine months.

  • State agencies are no longer allowed to set or be required to use values from EPA systems as the automatic standard for water quality criteria.
  • Agencies currently using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System as a default must change their rules within nine months of this law taking effect.
  • The amendment clarifies that agencies cannot create stricter requirements unless they have no choice under federal laws.
  • The text does not explain what specific values or systems should be used instead of the EPA's Integrated Risk Information System after it is removed as a default.
  • It is unclear how agencies will determine if they truly have 'no discretion' under federal requirements to justify stricter rules.
U9HPTGX-1

R 207 • Coleman-Madison

Failed

Plain English: This amendment attempts to change how the bill defines specific terms and phrases related to scientific evidence, but it is too incomplete to explain exactly what new rules would be created.

  • It replaces a section on page 3 with a definition for 'REFEREED JOURNAL' as a type of publication.
  • The amendment text is cut off and missing the full definitions or rules it intends to add.
  • Because large parts of the new language are not included, we cannot explain what changes would happen on page 5 regarding scientific evidence or causal links.

Bill History

  1. 2026-02-20 Senate

    Enacted

  2. 2026-02-19 House

    Signature Requested

  3. 2026-02-19 Senate

    Delivered to Governor

  4. 2026-02-18 Senate

    Enrolled

  5. 2026-02-18 Senate

    Ready to Enroll

  6. 2026-02-18 Senate

    Ready to Enroll

  7. 2026-02-17 House

    Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass - Adopted Roll Call 447 (Yeas 68, Nays 34)

  8. 2026-02-17 House

    Brown motion to Previous Question - Adopted Roll Call 446 (Yeas 72, Nays 30)

  9. 2026-02-17 House

    Stubbs motion to Table - Adopted Roll Call 445 (Yeas 72, Nays 30)

  10. 2026-02-17 House

    Stubbs motion to Table - Adopted Roll Call 444 (Yeas 70, Nays 30)

  11. 2026-02-17 House

    Stubbs motion to Table - Adopted Roll Call 443 (Yeas 68, Nays 30)

  12. 2026-02-17 House

    Third Reading in Second House (Yeas 68, Nays 30)

  13. 2026-02-17 House

    Wilcox intended to vote "Abstain"

  14. 2026-02-17 House

    Lands 1st Amendment Offered

  15. 2026-02-17 House

    Clarke 1st Amendment Offered

  16. 2026-02-17 House

    Jones 1st Amendment Offered

  17. 2026-02-05 House

    Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar

  18. 2026-02-05 House

    Reported Out of Committee Second House

  19. 2026-02-03 Senate

    Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass as Amended - Adopted Roll Call 229 (Yeas 27, Nays 7)

  20. 2026-02-03 Senate

    Coleman-Madison motion to Adopt - Lost Roll Call 207 (Yeas 7, Nays 25)

  21. 2026-02-03 Senate

    Chesteen motion to Adopt - Adopted Roll Call 206 (Yeas 33, Nays 0)

  22. 2026-02-03 Senate

    Third Reading in House of Origin (Yeas 33, Nays 0)

  23. 2026-02-03 House

    Pending Committee Action in Second House

  24. 2026-02-03 House

    Read for the first time and referred to the House Committee on Agriculture and Forestry

  25. 2026-02-03 Senate

    Engrossed

  26. 2026-02-03 Senate

    Carried Over to the Call of the Chair

  27. 2026-02-03 Senate

    Coleman-Madison 1st Amendment Offered

  28. 2026-02-03 Senate

    County and Municipal Government 1st Amendment Offered

  29. 2026-01-20 Senate

    Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar

  30. 2026-01-20 Senate

    Reported Out of Committee House of Origin

  31. 2026-01-20 Senate

    County and Municipal Government 1st Amendment

  32. 2026-01-13 Senate

    Pending Committee Action in House of Origin

  33. 2026-01-13 Senate

    Read for the first time and referred to the Senate Committee on County and Municipal Government

Official Summary Text

This act prohibits a state agency from adopting or amending a rule that establishes numeric limitations or criteria for certain substances relating to environmental protection that: (1) is more stringent or extensive than federal requirements on the same topic; and (2) if there are no federal requirements on the same topic, is not based on the best available science and weight of scientific research for each substance to which the rule applies.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
SB71 ENROLLED
Page 0
SB71
84IXWHH-3
By Senator Chesteen
RFD: County and Municipal Government
First Read: 13-Jan-26
1
2
3
4
5
SB71 Enrolled
Page 1
First Read: 13-Jan-26
Enrolled, An Act,
Relating to administrative law; to prohibit agencies
from adopting a new rule, or amending an existing rule, that
establishes standards for certain environmental protection
subjects that are more stringent than the federal
requirements; and to prohibit an agency from adopting a new
rule, or amending an existing rule, in the absence of federal
requirements, unless the rule is based on the best available
science and the weight of scientific evidence.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF ALABAMA:
Section 1. (a) For purposes of this section, the
following terms have the following meanings:
(1) AGENCY. The term as defined in Section 41-22-3,
Code of Alabama 1975.
(2) BEST AVAILABLE SCIENCE. Science that:
a. Is reliable, unbiased, subject to independent
verification, and applies to the agency's rule;
b. Maximizes the quality, objectivity, relevance,
completeness, and integrity of information, including
statistical information; human, animal, and other relevant
scientific studies; and, if applicable, human health
risk-based assessments; and
c. Involves the use of scientifically defensible and
quality-assured supporting studies conducted in accordance
with generally accepted scientific or technical practices
utilizing data collected by generally accepted methods or best
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SB71 Enrolled
Page 2
utilizing data collected by generally accepted methods or best
available methods and that are:
1. Site-specific studies, including area-wide or
statewide studies;
2. Studies published in a refereed journal; or
3. External peer-reviewed studies contained in a
federal government report published for a purpose other than
development of a rule.
(3) GENERALLY ACCEPTED SCIENTIFIC OR TECHNICAL
PRACTICES. Scientific methods, principles, or protocols that:
a. Are broadly acknowledged and routinely applied by
the relevant scientific community;
b. Are consistent with refereed journal literature or
established technical standards; and
c. Have been tested for reliability and validity.
(4) MANIFEST BODILY HARM. A physical disease or injury
that is:
a. Presently existing and diagnosable;
b. Not based solely on the presence or detection of a
substance in the human body; and
c. Not based solely on an increased risk of disease.
(5) REFEREED JOURNAL. A publication that:
a. Uses an editorial board or critical review panel of
subject matter experts in the relevant scientific or technical
disciplines who critically and objectively assess the
methodology and analysis of submitted scientific studies in a
nonpartisan fashion and provides editorial services prior to
publication; and
b. Takes meaningful steps to avoid biases in the
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
SB71 Enrolled
Page 3
b. Takes meaningful steps to avoid biases in the
publication's scientific review process.
(6) WEIGHT OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE. An approach to
scientific evaluation in which each piece of relevant
information is considered based on its quality and relevance,
which, at a minimum, includes consideration of study design,
fitness for purpose, replicability, peer review, and
transparency and reliability of data; and the information is
transparently integrated with other relevant information to
inform the scientific evaluation prior to making a judgment
about the scientific evaluation.
(b) An agency may not adopt a new rule or amend an
existing rule that establishes new or changes existing numeric
criteria or numeric limitations applicable to a chemical
substance, mixture, contaminant, pollutant, hazardous
substance, solid waste, hazardous constituent, or hazardous
waste that relates to drinking water, water pollution control,
hazardous substances, contaminated site remediation, air
quality, solid waste handling, or hazardous waste handling if
the new rule or amendment would result in criteria or
limitations that are more stringent or extensive in scope,
coverage, or effect than any federal law or regulation setting
a standard regarding the same or a substantially similar
topic.
(c) Notwithstanding subsection (b), if there is no
federal law or regulation establishing a standard regarding
the same or a substantially similar topic, an agency may not
adopt a new rule or amend an existing rule that establishes
numeric criteria or numeric limitations applicable to a
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
SB71 Enrolled
Page 4
numeric criteria or numeric limitations applicable to a
chemical substance, mixture, contaminant, pollutant, hazardous
substance, solid waste, hazardous constituent, or hazardous
waste that relates to drinking water, water pollution control,
hazardous substances, contaminated site remediation, air
quality, solid waste handling, or hazardous waste handling
unless, for each individual chemical substance, mixture,
contaminant, pollutant, hazardous substance, solid waste,
hazardous constituent, or hazardous waste to which the rule
applies, the scientific and technical information relied on to
support the standard established by the rule is based on the
best available science and the weight of scientific evidence.
(d)(1) For any rule adopted pursuant to subsection (c)
to protect human health, safety, or welfare, the best
available science and the weight of scientific evidence shall
establish a direct causal link between exposure at or above
the numeric criteria or numeric limitations provided by the
rule and manifest bodily harm in humans, based on generally
accepted scientific or technical practices.
(2) In the absence of data from voluntary scientific
studies on humans, best available science and the weight of
scientific evidence may be based on tests performed on
experimental animal species or human and animal cells
establishing a direct causal link, based on generally accepted
scientific or technical practices, between exposure at or
above the numeric criteria or numeric limitations provided by
the rule and manifest bodily harm in humans, provided that the
harm may be extrapolated to humans based on the best available
science and the weight of scientific evidence.
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
SB71 Enrolled
Page 5
science and the weight of scientific evidence.
(e)(1) No agency shall establish as the default or be
required to use values from the United States Environmental
Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System in the
development of numeric water quality criteria.
(2) An agency that has adopted a rule establishing use
of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's
Integrated Risk Information System as the default in any
numeric water quality criteria shall revise all rules to
comply with this subsection not later than nine months after
the effective date of this act.
(f) This section does not apply to any of the
following:
(1) A rule that is required by federal law or
regulation, including a rule adopted to comply with, and in
furtherance of, federal agency authorization or primacy
requirements, so long as an agency does not have discretion or
flexibility under some or all of the federal requirements or
authorization.
(2) A rule that is less stringent or extensive in
scope, coverage, or effect than any federal law or regulation
setting a standard regarding the same or a substantially
similar topic or that is substantively equivalent to a federal
law or regulation.
(3) A rule that would repeal or modify an existing rule
to be less stringent or extensive in scope, coverage, or
effect.
(4) An emergency rule adopted pursuant to Section
41-22-5, Code of Alabama 1975.
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
SB71 Enrolled
Page 6
41-22-5, Code of Alabama 1975.
Section 2. This act shall become effective immediately.141
SB71 Enrolled
Page 7
Section 2. This act shall become effective immediately.
________________________________________________
President and Presiding Officer of the Senate
________________________________________________
Speaker of the House of Representatives
SB71
Senate 03-Feb-26
I hereby certify that the within Act originated in and passed
the Senate, as amended.
Patrick Harris,
Secretary.
House of Representatives
Passed: 17-Feb-26
By: Senator Chesteen
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174