Plain English Breakdown
The source text does not define 'human entity' separately from 'natural person', leaving ambiguity on how they differ in practice.
HB 251: Defining Person and Life in Alaska Law
This bill updates how Alaska law defines the words 'person' for general statutes and criminal cases, adds a definition of 'life', and sets an effective date.
What This Bill Does
- Updates the general statute definition of 'person' to include natural persons or human entities with the moral right of self-determination, as well as corporations and other organizations.
- States that under general statutes, a 'person' does not include environmental elements, artificial intelligence, animals, or inanimate objects.
- Updates criminal law definitions so 'person' means a natural person or a human entity with the moral right of self-determination, and sometimes includes an organization, government, or governmental instrumentality.
- States that under criminal law, a 'person' does not include environmental elements, artificial intelligence, animals, or inanimate objects.
- Adds a new definition for 'life' as the quality distinguishing living human organisms from dead ones or matter, shown through metabolism, growth, reproduction, response to stimuli, or adaptation originating within the organism.
- Sets rules so these criminal law definitions apply only to offenses committed on or after July 1, 2026.
Who It Names or Affects
- Courts and judges interpreting Alaska statutes
- Law enforcement agencies handling criminal cases
Terms To Know
- Natural person
- A human being, as opposed to a business or group.
- Moral right of self-determination
- The specific quality required for a 'human entity' to be considered a 'person' under this bill.
Limits and Unknowns
- The text does not explain how courts will decide if a human entity has the moral right of self-determination.
- It is unclear which specific criminal charges or civil cases these definitions will change in practice beyond those covered by AS 11.81.900.