Plain English Breakdown
The bill text contains conflicting markings for the degree of criminal trespass (showing both third and first degree) and section numbers (13-1502 and 13-1504), indicating uncertainty about which specific law applies.
HB2047: Changes to Eviction Orders and Trespass Rules
This bill changes rules for eviction orders in Arizona by requiring a five-day wait before enforcement, protecting Social Security numbers on court documents, and making it criminal trespass if someone returns after being served with an order.
What This Bill Does
- Requires courts to award landlords money owed under the rental agreement, damages, attorney fees, and costs when they win an eviction case.
- Orders that a defendant's Social Security number must not appear on the judgment document in these cases.
- Stops eviction orders from being issued until five calendar days have passed after the judge makes their decision.
- Makes it criminal trespass for someone served with an eviction order to stay or return to a dwelling unit, mobile home space, or recreational vehicle space without permission.
- Requires judges to tell defendants that staying on or returning to the property after being served is considered criminal trespass.
Who It Names or Affects
- Landlords and property owners who file eviction cases
- Tenants in dwelling units, mobile home spaces, and recreational vehicle spaces facing eviction
- Judges handling forcible entry or detainer cases
Terms To Know
- Writ of restitution
- A court order that allows law enforcement to remove a person from a property and return it to the owner.
- Forcible entry and detainer
- The legal name for an eviction lawsuit used when someone refuses to leave rented land or housing.
Limits and Unknowns
- This bill was vetoed by the governor on June 19, 2026, so it did not become law unless lawmakers overrode that decision.
- The text does not explain how judges decide if there is 'good cause' to delay an eviction order.