Back to Arizona

HB2211 • 2026

technical correction; materials; resident preference

HB2211 - technical correction; materials; resident preference

Budget Labor Taxes
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
David Livingston
Last action
2026-02-23
Official status
House second read
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source material does not provide details on how much preference should be given if resident dealers' bids are more than 5% higher, or what happens if there are no bids from resident dealers or if all competing bids exceed the threshold.

Technical Correction for Resident Preference in Material Supply Contracts

This bill amends Arizona law to give preference to resident dealers who supply materials for public construction contracts, provided their bid is not more than 5% higher than the lowest competing bid.

What This Bill Does

  • Amends an existing statute about giving preference to resident dealers who supply materials for public building projects funded with state money.
  • Requires that contracts be awarded to bidders using materials from a dealer who has paid taxes in Arizona for at least two years before bidding, if their bid is not more than 5% higher than the lowest competing bid.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Contractors and subcontractors who supply materials for public construction projects funded by state money.
  • Political subdivisions of Arizona that award contracts for material supply.

Terms To Know

Resident Dealer
A dealer who has paid real or personal property taxes in the state of Arizona for at least two consecutive years before bidding on a contract.
Public Funds
Money from the government used to pay for public projects, such as building construction and improvements.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify how much preference should be given if resident dealers' bids are more than 5% higher.
  • It's unclear what happens if there are no bids from resident dealers or if all competing bids exceed the 5% threshold.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Plain English: Fifty-seventh Legislature Appropriations Second Regular Session H.B.

  • Fifty-seventh Legislature Appropriations Second Regular Session H.B.
  • 2211 PROPOSED HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
  • 2211 (Reference to printed bill) Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert: 1 "Section 1.
  • Section 20-3117, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended 2 to read: 3 20-3117.
  • This amendment summary is using official source text because generated interpretation was skipped for this run.

Bill History

  1. 2026-02-23 House

    House second read

  2. 2026-02-19 House

    House Rules: None

  3. 2026-02-19 House

    House Appropriations: DISC/HELD

  4. 2026-02-19 House

    House first read

Official Summary Text

HB2211 - 572R - House Bill Summary

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

57th
Legislature, 2nd Regular Session

Majority Research Staff

HB
2211
: technical correction; materials; resident preference

S/E:
independent dispute resolution; patients

Sponsor:
Representative Livingston, LD 28

Committee
on Appropriations

Summary
of the Strike-Everything Amendment to HB 2211

Overview

Deems
it unprofessional conduct for a podiatrist, licensed physician or nurse to submit
an offer to an independent dispute resolution entity that is above 300% of the
approved Medicare reimbursement or 300% of the qualified payment amount.

History

Laws 2017, Chapter 190
, establishes a process for an
enrollee who has received a surprise out-of-network bill to seek a dispute
resolution for the disputed amount. A
surprise out-of-network bill
is a
bill for a health care service, a laboratory service or durable medical
equipment that was provided in a network facility by a health care provider
that is not a contracted provider. A bill must meet certain criteria to qualify
as a surprise out-of-network bill. The dispute resolution process consists of
an informal settlement teleconference and arbitration. The Department of
Insurance and Financial Institutions (DIFI) is required to develop a simple,
fair, efficient and cost-effective arbitration procedure for surprise
out-of-network bill disputes, as well as specify time frames, standards and
other details for the arbitration proceeding (A.R.S. ��
20-3111
,
�20-3113

and

20-3114
).

An enrollee may
seek dispute resolution for a surprise out-of-network bill by filing a request
with DIFI within one year of the date of service noted in the surprise out-of-network
bill. DIFI, in conjunction with appropriate health care boards, must prescribe
a notice that outlines an enrollee's rights to dispute surprise out-of-network
bills. Health insurers are required to include the prescribed notice in each
explanation of benefits or other similar claim adjudication notices issued to
enrollees that involves covered services provided by a noncontracted health
care provider. This pertains to claims that are not subject to an independent
dispute resolution (IDR) under the No Suprises Act (NSA). If an enrollee
contacts a health care provider, a provider's representative or a billing
company regarding a dispute involving a surprise out-of-network bill that is
not subject to an IDR under the NSA, �the health care provider, the provider's
representative or the billing company must provide written notice to the
enrollee of the dispute resolution process (A.R.S. �

20-3117
).

The NSA is a
federal law aimed towards protecting consumers from receiving surprise medical
bills resulting from out-of-network care. The federal law also requires health
care insurers to give patients a notice about their surprise billing
protections (
26 U.S.C. � 9816
). The NSA applies to the
uninsured and individuals insured by: 1) individual and group health insurance
plans; 2) student health insurance plans; 3) employer self-funded plans; 4)
non-federal government plans, such as state, county and city plans; 5) church
plans; and 6) federal employees health benefit plans. The NSA does not apply to
individuals covered under short term limited duration plans, critical illness
policies, other limited benefit plans, Medicare, the Arizona Health Care Cost
Containment System, Indian Health Services, Veterans Affairs Health Care or
TRICARE (
DIFI
).

Provisions

1.

Requires a
health insurer to remit payment of all amounts due to a nonparticipating health
care provider or facility in connection with an IDR proceeding within 30-day
time period, as applicable. (Sec. 2)

2.

Clarifies
that if there is a clear written contract for a fixed fee between a podiatrist,
licensed physician or nurse and a patient or if the patient has given informed
consent to waive the No Suprises Act protections and the health care
professional submits the consent form with the claim then it is not considered
unprofessional conduct. (Sec. 3-6)

3.

Specifies
that when a podiatrist, licensed physician or nurse submits an offer to an IDR
entity, and that offer exceeds either of the following, then it constitutes as
a clearly excessive fee, therefore considered to be unprofessional conduct:

a.

300% of the
approved Medicare reimbursement; or

b.

300% of the
qualified payment amount. (Sec. 3-6)

4.

Makes
technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1, 5)

5.

6.

7.

---------- DOCUMENT
FOOTER ---------

8.

Initials AG���������������������� HB
2211

9.

2/20/2026� Page 0 Appropriations

10.

11.

---------- DOCUMENT
FOOTER ---------

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HB2211 - 572R - I Ver

PREFILED��� JAN 09 2026

REFERENCE TITLE:
technical correction; materials; resident preference

State of Arizona

House of Representatives

Fifty-seventh Legislature

Second Regular Session

2026

HB 2211

Introduced by

Representative
Livingston

AN
ACT

amending section 34-243, Arizona
Revised Statutes; relating to eligibility and preference of contractors and
subcontractors.

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Section 34-243, Arizona Revised
Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE
34-243.

Preference for materials supplied by resident dealers in awarding
contracts for furnishing materials

In awarding contracts for furnishing materials to construct a
building or structure, or additions to or alterations of existing buildings or
structures, either directly or through a contractor, to any political
subdivision of this state, to be paid for from public funds, the contract shall
be awarded to bidders who furnish materials supplied by a dealer who is a
resident of this state
and
who has for not less than two
successive years immediately
prior to

before

submitting the bid paid real or personal property taxes assessed under
title 42 in preference to a competing bidder who furnishes materials not
supplied by the resident dealer, whenever the bid of the competing bidder,
quality and suitability considered, is less than five per cent lower than that
of the resident dealer.
END_STATUTE