Back to Arizona

HB2341 • 2026

line siting; factors; offtakers

HB2341 - line siting; factors; offtakers

Energy
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Ralph Heap, David Marshall, Sr.
Last action
2026-03-09
Official status
Senate second read
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary does not provide specific details on the criteria for determining speculativeness or how it will impact existing projects.

Line Siting; Factors; Offtakers

This bill adds the existence of known buyers (offtakers) as a factor in determining if a new power plant or transmission line is environmentally compatible.

What This Bill Does

  • Adds the speculativeness of proposed projects, identified by the presence of known offtakers, to the factors considered when issuing a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility (CEC).
  • Defines 'known offtakers' as specific buyers with legally binding contracts to purchase future output from power plants or transmission lines.
  • Specifies that for public service corporations and public power entities, their customers are considered known offtakers without needing detailed contracts.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Utilities planning to build new plants or transmission lines in Arizona.
  • The Arizona Corporation Commission and the Power Plant and Transmission Line Siting Committee.
  • Public service corporations and public power entities doing business in Arizona.

Terms To Know

Certificate of Environmental Compatibility (CEC)
A document issued by a committee to confirm that a proposed project meets environmental standards.
Offtakers
Buyers who have legally binding contracts to purchase future output from power plants or transmission lines.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify the exact criteria for determining if a project is speculative.
  • It remains unclear how this change will affect existing projects and their environmental compatibility assessments.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Plain English: Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES, ENERGY & WATER HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.

  • Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES, ENERGY & WATER HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
  • 2341 (Reference to printed bill) The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows: 1 Section 1.
  • Section 40-360.06, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended 2 to read: 3 40-360.06.
  • Factors to be considered in issuing a certificate 4 of environmental compatibility 5 A.
  • This amendment summary is using official source text because generated interpretation was skipped for this run.

Plain English: Fifty-seventh Legislature Natural Resources, Energy & Water Second Regular Session H.B.

  • Fifty-seventh Legislature Natural Resources, Energy & Water Second Regular Session H.B.
  • 2341 PROPOSED HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
  • 2341 (Reference to printed bill) The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows: 1 Section 1.
  • Section 40-360.06, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended 2 to read: 3 40-360.06.
  • This amendment summary is using official source text because generated interpretation was skipped for this run.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Senate second read

  2. 2026-03-05 Senate

    Senate Rules: None

  3. 2026-03-05 Senate

    Senate Natural Resources: None

  4. 2026-03-05 Senate

    Senate first read

  5. 2026-02-26 Senate

    Transmitted to Senate

  6. 2026-02-26 House

    House third read passed

  7. 2026-02-25 House

    House committee of the whole

  8. 2026-02-24 House

    House minority caucus

  9. 2026-02-24 House

    House majority caucus

  10. 2026-01-21 House

    House second read

  11. 2026-01-20 House

    House Rules: C&P

  12. 2026-01-20 House

    House Natural Resources, Energy & Water: DPA

  13. 2026-01-20 House

    House first read

Official Summary Text

HB2341 - 572R - House Bill Summary

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

57th
Legislature, 2nd Regular Session

Majority Research Staff

House:
NREW DPA 6-3-0-1

HB
2341
: line siting; factors; offtakers

Sponsor:
Representative Heap, LD 10

Caucus
& COW

Overview

Expands
determining factors for issuing a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility (CEC)
to include the speculativeness of the proposed transmission line or plant as
identified by the existence of known offtakers.

History

Each utility that plans to construct a plant or transmission
line, both defined by statute, in this state must first file an application for
a CEC with the Arizona Corporation Commission which will be referred to the
Chairman of the Power Plant and Transmission Line Siting Committee (Committee).
The Committee may evaluate an application for a CEC and may impose reasonable
conditions on its issuance. The CEC's evaluation must consider certain
conditions including:

1)

existing
plans of this state, local government and private entities for other
developments in the vicinity of the proposed site;

2)

noise
emission levels and interference with communication signals; and

3)

the
total environment of the area (A.R.S. ��
40-360
,
40-360.03

and
40-360.06
).

Provisions

1.

Adds the
speculativeness of the proposed transmission line or plant as identified by the
existence of known offtakers as a factor for considering applications for a CEC
regarding the suitability of a plant or transmission line siting plan. (Sec. 1)

2.

Defines
known
offtakers
as specific, identified buyers that have entered into legally
binding, long-term contracts to purchase a substantial portion of a project's
future output. (Sec. 1)

3.

Defines
speculativeness

as the level of risk or uncertainty that is associated with a project's
financial success. (Sec. 1)

4.

Makes
technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1)

Amendments

Committee on
Natural Resources, Energy & Water

1.

Specifies
identified buyers under
known offtakers
:

a.

for a
proposed transmission line, as a buyer contracted to purchase a portion of the
future output of any electrical generating unit that is related to or will be
interconnected with the proposed transmission line; and

b.

for a
proposed plant, specific, identified buyers that have entered into legally
binding, long-term contracts to purchase a portion of the plant's future
output.

2.

Stipulates
that
speculativeness
is to apply to the proposed transmission line's or
plant's financial success.

3.

States that
an applicant who is a public service corporation or public power entity doing
business in this state:

a.

will
consider the public service corporation's or public power entity's customers as

known offtakers
;

b.

is exempt
from requiring the identification of specific buyers and legally binding
long-term contracts; and

c.

cannot
consider a proposed transmission line or plan as speculative.

4.

Makes
technical and conforming changes.

---------- DOCUMENT FOOTER ---------

Initials CW/HC�������������������� HB
2341

2/18/2026������� Page
0 Caucus & COW

---------- DOCUMENT FOOTER ---------

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HB2341 - 572R - H Ver

House Engrossed

line siting; factors;
offtakers

State of Arizona

House of Representatives

Fifty-seventh Legislature

Second Regular Session

2026

HOUSE BILL 2341

AN
ACT

amending section 40-360.06, arizona
revised statutes; relating to the power plant and transmission line siting
committee.

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

Be it
enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Section 40-360.06, Arizona Revised
Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE
40-360.06.

Factors to be considered in issuing a certificate of
environmental compatibility

A. The committee may approve or deny an application
and may impose reasonable conditions on the issuance of a certificate of
environmental compatibility and in so doing shall consider the following
factors as a basis for its action with respect to the suitability of either plant
or transmission line siting plans:

1. Existing plans of this state,
a
local
government and private entities for other developments at or in the vicinity of
the proposed site.

2. Fish, wildlife and plant life and associated
forms of life on which they are dependent.

3. Noise emission levels and interference with
communication signals.

4. The proposed availability of the site to the
public for recreational purposes, consistent with safety considerations and
regulations.

5. Existing scenic areas, historic sites and
structures or archaeological sites at or in the vicinity of the proposed site.

6. The total environment of the area.

7. The technical practicability of achieving a
proposed objective and the previous experience with equipment and methods
available for achieving a proposed objective.

8. The estimated cost of the facilities and site as
proposed by the applicant and the estimated cost of the facilities and site as
recommended by the committee, recognizing that any significant increase in
costs represents a potential increase in the cost of electric energy to the
customers or the applicant.

9. The SPECULATIVENESS of the
proposed transmission line or plant as identified by the existence of known
offtakers.� For the purposes of this paragraph:

(
a
) "Known
offtakers" means
:

(
i
) For a
proposed transmission line, specific, identified buyers that have entered into
legally binding, long-term contracts to purchase a portion of
the future output of any electric generating unit that is related to
or will be interconnected with the proposed transmission line.

(
ii
) For a
proposed plant, specific, identified buyers that have entered into legally
binding, long-term contracts to purchase a portion of the plant's future
output.

(
b
) "Speculativeness"
means the level of risk or uncertainty that is associated with
the proposed transmission line's or plant's financial success.

(
c
) If the
applicant for the proposed transmission line or plant is a public service
corporation or public power entity doing business in this state, the public
service corporation's or public power entity's customers shall serve as the
existence of known offtakers, the identification of specific buyers and legally
binding long-term contracts are not required and the proposed
transmission line or plant may not be deemed speculative.

9.

10.
Any
additional factors that require consideration under applicable federal and
state laws pertaining to any such site.

B. The committee shall give special consideration to
the protection of areas
that are
unique because of
biological wealth or because they are habitats for rare and endangered species.

C. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
article, the committee shall require in all certificates for facilities that
the applicant comply with all applicable nuclear radiation standards and air
and water pollution control standards and regulations
,

but shall not require either of the following:

1. Compliance with performance standards other than
those established by the agency having primary jurisdiction over a particular
pollution source.

2. That a contractor, subcontractor, material
supplier or other person
that is
engaged in the
construction, maintenance, repair or improvement of any project subject to
approval of the commission negotiate, execute or otherwise become a party to
any project labor agreement, neutrality agreement as defined in section 34-321,
apprenticeship program participation or contribution agreement or other
agreement with employees, employees' representatives or any labor organization
as a condition of or a factor in the commission's approval of the project.�
This paragraph does not:

(a) Prohibit private parties from entering into
individual collective bargaining relationships.

(b) Regulate or interfere with activity
that is
protected by law, including the national labor
relations act
.

D. Any certificate
that is

granted by the committee shall be conditioned on compliance by the applicant
with all applicable ordinances, master plans and regulations of
the

this
state, a county or an incorporated city or town,
except that the committee may grant a certificate notwithstanding any such
ordinance, master plan or regulation, exclusive of franchises, if the committee
finds as a fact that compliance with such
an
ordinance,
master plan or regulation is unreasonably restrictive and compliance therewith
is not feasible in view of technology available.
When

If
it becomes apparent to the chairman of the committee
or to the hearing officer that an issue exists with respect to whether such an
ordinance, master plan or regulation is unreasonably restrictive and compliance
therewith is not feasible in view of technology available, the chairman or
hearing officer shall promptly serve notice of such fact by certified mail on
the chief executive officer of the area of jurisdiction affected and,
notwithstanding any provision of this article to the contrary, shall make such
area of jurisdiction a party to the proceedings on its request and shall give
it an opportunity to respond on such issue.
END_STATUTE