Back to Arizona

HB2460 • 2026

business property; theft; penalties; prohibition

HB2460 - business property; theft; penalties; prohibition

Vetoed

The latest official action shows the governor vetoed this bill. Check the bill history to see whether lawmakers later overrode that veto.

Sponsor
Nick Kupper
Last action
2026-06-19
Official status
Governor vetoed
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official status indicates the bill was vetoed; it is unclear from the provided metadata whether a legislative override occurred.

HB2460: The CART Act on Business Property Theft

This bill stops cities and counties from charging businesses fines or fees when their movable property, like shopping carts, is stolen by others.

What This Bill Does

  • Prohibits municipalities and counties from creating rules that punish a business for the theft of its own movable property.
  • Bans local governments from requiring businesses to pay for retrieving, storing, or disposing of their stolen items found off-site.
  • Allows cities and counties to notify businesses about where their lost property is located so they can pick it up without paying fees.
  • Permits local authorities to charge criminal or civil penalties against the person who actually stole the business's property.
  • Gives businesses the right to sue in court if a city or county tries to enforce these banned rules, with winning businesses getting their legal costs paid back.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Cities and towns that want to make local laws about lost shopping carts or baskets.
  • Counties that manage property retrieval programs for commercial items.
  • Businesses that own movable property like shopping carts intended for customer use.
  • The Arizona Attorney General, who can also take legal action against non-compliant cities and counties.

Terms To Know

Movable Property
Tangible items owned by a business meant for temporary customer use, such as shopping carts or hand-held baskets.
Theft (in this bill)
When someone other than the owner takes, removes, or abandons a business's movable property without permission.
State Preemption
A rule stating that only the state can make laws on this topic, stopping cities and counties from making their own rules about it.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill was vetoed by the governor in June 2026, so these changes are not currently law unless lawmakers override that decision.
  • This text does not explain how local governments will handle general nuisance laws if they cannot specifically target theft of business property.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Plain English: This amendment stops cities and counties from fining businesses when their customers steal or abandon items like shopping carts.

  • Cities and counties cannot create rules that punish a business for the theft of its own movable property, such as shopping carts or baskets.
  • Local governments are banned from charging fees to retrieve, store, or dispose of stolen business property found off-site.
  • Businesses can still be protected by laws against the actual person who stole the items, and local governments can notify businesses where their lost items are located for free pickup.
  • The full text explaining why this law was created (Legislative findings) is cut off at the end of the provided document.
  • This amendment only applies to Arizona state laws regarding cities and counties, not private businesses or other states.

Plain English: This amendment stops cities and counties from fining businesses when their movable items, like shopping carts or baskets, are stolen by customers.

  • Cities and counties cannot create rules that punish a business for the theft of its own property intended for customer use.
  • Local governments must allow businesses to retrieve lost items without charging fees for storage, retrieval, or disposal.
  • The law defines 'theft' in this context as customers taking, removing, or abandoning business-owned movable property like shopping carts.
  • Businesses can sue local governments in court if they try to enforce these banned penalties and may recover legal costs.
  • The full text of the legislative findings explaining why this law is needed was cut off at the end of the provided document.
  • This amendment only applies to Arizona Revised Statutes sections regarding cities (municipalities) and counties, not other types of local rules.

Bill History

  1. 2026-06-10 V

    Governor vetoed

  2. 2026-06-09 House

    House passed

  3. 2026-06-09 House

    House passed

  4. 2026-04-21 House

    House minority caucus

  5. 2026-04-13 House

    Transmitted to House

  6. 2026-04-13 Senate

    Senate third read passed

  7. 2026-04-13 Senate

    Senate committee of the whole

  8. 2026-03-30 Senate

    Senate minority caucus

  9. 2026-03-30 Senate

    Senate majority caucus

  10. 2026-03-10 Senate

    Senate second read

  11. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Senate Rules: PFC

  12. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Senate Government: DPA

  13. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Senate first read

  14. 2026-02-26 Senate

    Transmitted to Senate

  15. 2026-02-25 House

    House third read passed

  16. 2026-02-23 House

    House committee of the whole

  17. 2026-02-03 House

    House minority caucus

  18. 2026-02-03 House

    House majority caucus

  19. 2026-02-02 House

    House consent calendar

  20. 2026-01-21 House

    House second read

  21. 2026-01-20 House

    House Rules: C&P

  22. 2026-01-20 House

    House Government: DP

  23. 2026-01-20 House

    House first read

Official Summary Text

HB2460 - business property; theft; penalties; prohibition

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HB2460 - 572R - S Ver

Senate Engrossed
House Bill

business property;
theft; penalties; prohibition

State of Arizona

House of Representatives

Fifty-seventh Legislature

Second Regular Session

2026

HOUSE BILL 2460

AN
ACT

amending title 9, chapter 4, article 8,
arizona revised statutes, by adding section 9-500.54; amending title 11,
chapter 2, article 4, arizona revised statutes, by adding section 11-269.31;
relating to business property.

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

Be it
enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section
1.
1. Title
9, chapter 4, article 8, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section
9-500.54, to read:

START_STATUTE
9-500.54.

Business property; theft; penalties; prohibition; enforcement;
state preemption; definitions

A. Notwithstanding any other law, a
municipality may not adopt or enforce any ordinance, rule or regulation that
imposes a penalty on a business for the theft of the movable property of the
business.

B. A municipality may not enforce a
penalty that does any of the following:

1. Imposes fines or fees for
abandoned movable property that belongs to a business that is found off of the
property of the business.

2. Requires a business to pay for the
retrieval, storage or disposal of movable property that belongs to the business
and that has been RETRIEVED or collected by the municipality.

3. Mandates that a business certify
compliance with municipal retrieval programs under the threat of imposing a
penalty if the noncompliance by the business is based on the theft of the
movable property that belongs to the business.

C. A municipality may do any of the
following:

1. Notify a business of the location
of movable property that belongs to the business and allow the business to
voluntarily RETRIEVE the movable property without imposing any fee.

2. Institute criminal or civil
penalties against a person who is responsible for the theft of movable property
that belongs to a business.

3. Enact general nuisance abatement
ordinances, rules or regulations that do not specifically include imposing a
penalty on a business for THE theft of movable property that belongs to the
business.

D. The attorney general or any
business may bring an action in the superior court to enjoin a municipality
from enforcing an ordinance, rule or regulation that is prohibited by this
section. A business that prevails in an action brought pursuant to
this subsection is entitled to recovery of reasonable attorney fees and costs.

E. The regulation of the theft of
movable property of a business is of statewide concern. The regulation of the
theft of movable property of a business pursuant to this section is not subject
to further regulation by a municipality.

F. For the purposes of this section:

1. "Business" means any
commercial enterprise that owns or provides movable property for use by the
customers of the business.

2. "movable property":

(
a
) means
tangible property that is owned by a business that is intended for temporary
use by the customers of the business.

(
b
) Includes
shopping carts and hand-held baskets.

3. "Theft" means
unauthorized taking, removing or abandoning movable property that belongs to a
business by a person other than the owner of the business or an owner's
authorized agent.
END_STATUTE

Sec.
2.
2. Title
11, chapter 2, article 4, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding
section 11-269.31, to read:

START_STATUTE
11-269.31.

Business property; theft; penalties; prohibition; enforcement;
state preemption; definitions

A. Notwithstanding any other law, a
county may not adopt or enforce any ordinance, rule or regulation that imposes
a penalty on a business for the theft of the movable property of the business.

B. A county may not enforce a penalty
that does any of the following:

1. Imposes fines or fees for
abandoned movable property that belongs to a business that is found off of the
property of the business.

2. Requires a business to pay for the
retrieval, storage or disposal of movable property that belongs to the business
and that has been RETRIEVED or collected by the
county.

3. Mandates that a business certify
compliance with county retrieval programs under the threat of imposing a
penalty if the noncompliance by the business is based on the theft of the
movable property that belongs to the business.

C. A county may do any of the
following:

1. Notify a business of the location
of movable property that belongs to the business and allow the business to
voluntarily RETRIEVE the movable property without imposing any fee.

2. Institute criminal or civil
penalties against a person who is responsible for the theft of movable property
that belongs to a business.

3. Enact general nuisance abatement
ordinances, rules or regulations that do not specifically include imposing a
penalty on a business for THE theft of movable property that belongs to the
business.

D. The attorney general or any
business may bring an action in the superior court to enjoin a county from
enforcing an ordinance, rule or regulation that is prohibited by this section.
A business that prevails in an action brought pursuant to this subsection is
entitled to recovery of reasonable attorney fees and costs.

E. The regulation of the theft of
movable property of a business is of statewide concern. The regulation of the
theft of movable property of a business pursuant to this section is not subject
to further regulation by a county.

F. For the purposes of this section:

1. "Business" means any
commercial enterprise that owns or provides movable property for use by the
customers of the business.

2. "movable property":

(
a
) means
tangible property that is owned by a business that is intended for temporary
use by the customers of the business.

(
b
) Includes
shopping carts and hand-held baskets.

3. "Theft" means
unauthorized taking, removing or abandoning movable property that belongs to a
business by a person other than the owner of the business or an owner's
authorized agent.
END_STATUTE

Sec.
3.
3.
Severability

If a provision of this act or its
application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does
not affect other provisions or applications of the act that can be given effect
without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of
this act are severable.

Sec.
4.
4.
Legislative
findings

The legislature finds that:

1. Theft of business
property, including shopping carts, imposes significant financial burdens on
businesses through no fault of their own.

2. Local ordinances
that penalize businesses for a theft or abandonment of their property by third
parties, including criminals or unauthorized users, unfairly shifts
responsibility from perpetrators to victims.

3. Penalties imposed by
local ordinances discourage business investment, increase operational costs and
may lead to higher prices for consumers.

4. It is the policy of
this state to protect businesses from undue regulations that penalize them for
crimes committed against them.

Sec.
5.
5.
Short
title

This act may be cited as the
"Completely Asinine Rule Termination (CART) Act".