Back to Arizona

HB2574 • 2026

traffic penalties; appeal; stay

HB2574 - traffic penalties; appeal; stay

Crime
Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Neal Carter, Anna Abeytia, Cesar Aguilar, Lorena Austin, Seth Blattman, Pamela Carter, Janeen Connolly, Lupe Contreras, Patty Contreras, Quantá Crews, Brian Garcia, Alexander Kolodin, Sarah Liguori, Chris Lopez, Elda Luna-Nájera, Aaron Márquez, Christopher Mathis, Quang H Nguyen, Mae Peshlakai, Tony Rivero, Stephanie Simacek, Stephanie Stahl Hamilton, Myron Tsosie, Betty J Villegas, Lela Alston, Denise “Mitzi” Epstein, Rosanna Gabaldón, Lauren Kuby, Analise Ortiz
Last action
2026-06-04
Official status
Chapter 100
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Using official source text because the generated explanation was unavailable or could not be confirmed against the official bill text.

traffic penalties; appeal; stay

HB2574 - 572R - Senate Fact Sheet Assigned to ATT�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� FOR COMMITTEE ARIZONA STATE SENATE Fifty-Seventh Legislature, Second Regular Session FACT SHEET FOR H.B.

What This Bill Does

  • HB2574 - 572R - Senate Fact Sheet Assigned to ATT�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� FOR COMMITTEE ARIZONA STATE SENATE Fifty-Seventh Legislature, Second Regular Session FACT SHEET FOR H.B.
  • 2574 traffic penalties; appeal; stay Purpose Requires the court to report the stay of enforcement of a judgment for a traffic violation to the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) if an appeal is granted for the judgment and prohibits ADOT from taking any administrative action until the stay is lifted or the judgment is affirmed.
  • Background Municipal and justice courts have concurrent jurisdiction over civil and misdemeanor criminal traffic violations that are committed within the boundaries of the court by persons who are at least 18 years old and, if the presiding judge of the superior court declines jurisdiction, persons under 18 years old.
  • A party may appeal the judgment of the municipal or justice court regarding a civil or misdemeanor traffic violation to the superior court.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This entry is temporarily using official source text because the generated explanation could not be confirmed against the official bill text during the last sync.

Bill History

  1. 2026-06-01 Senate

    Governor signed

  2. 2026-05-26 House

    Transmitted to House

  3. 2026-05-26 Senate

    Senate third read passed

  4. 2026-03-30 Senate

    Senate minority caucus

  5. 2026-03-30 Senate

    Senate majority caucus

  6. 2026-03-30 Senate

    Senate consent calendar

  7. 2026-03-16 Senate

    Senate second read

  8. 2026-03-11 Senate

    Senate Rules: PFC

  9. 2026-03-11 Senate

    Senate Appropriations, Transportation and Technology: DP

  10. 2026-03-11 Senate

    Senate first read

  11. 2026-03-04 Senate

    Transmitted to Senate

  12. 2026-03-04 House

    House third read passed

  13. 2026-02-23 House

    House committee of the whole

  14. 2026-02-03 House

    House minority caucus

  15. 2026-02-03 House

    House majority caucus

  16. 2026-02-02 House

    House consent calendar

  17. 2026-01-21 House

    House second read

  18. 2026-01-20 House

    House Rules: C&P

  19. 2026-01-20 House

    House Transportation & Infrastructure: DP

  20. 2026-01-20 House

    House first read

Official Summary Text

HB2574 - 572R - Senate Fact Sheet

Assigned to
ATT�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� FOR
COMMITTEE

ARIZONA STATE SENATE

Fifty-Seventh
Legislature, Second Regular Session

FACT SHEET FOR
H.B. 2574

traffic penalties;
appeal; stay

Purpose

Requires the
court to report the stay of enforcement of a judgment for a traffic violation
to the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) if an appeal is granted for
the judgment and prohibits ADOT from taking any administrative action until the
stay is lifted or the judgment is affirmed.

Background

Municipal and
justice courts have concurrent jurisdiction over civil and misdemeanor criminal
traffic violations that are committed within the boundaries of the court by
persons who are at least 18 years old and, if the presiding judge of the
superior court declines jurisdiction, persons under 18 years old. A party may
appeal the judgment of the municipal or justice court regarding a civil or
misdemeanor traffic violation to the superior court. The posting of an appeal
bond stays enforcement of the judgment. A person must pay all civil penalties
within 30 days from the entry of judgment, unless payment within 30 days will
place an undue economic burden on the person (A.R.S. ��
28-1552
;

28-1600
;
and
28-1601
).

There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund
associated with this legislation.

Provisions

1.

Stipulates that, if an appeal is granted for the judgment of a traffic
violation, the court must report the stay of enforcement of the judgment to
ADOT.

2.

Prohibits ADOT from pursuing any administrative action relating to the
judgment until the stay is lifted or affirmed by an appellate court.

3.

Becomes effective on the general effective date.

House Action

TI������������������� 1/28/26����� DP������ 7-0-0-0

3
rd
Read��������� 3/4/26������������������� 52-0-7-0-1

Prepared by Senate Research

March 20, 2026

LMM/KS/ci

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Chapter 0100 - 572R - H Ver of HB2574

House Engrossed

traffic penalties;
appeal; stay

State of Arizona

House of Representatives

Fifty-seventh Legislature

Second Regular Session

2026

CHAPTER 100

HOUSE BILL 2574

AN
ACT

amending section 28-1600, Arizona Revised
Statutes; relating to appeals of traffic violations.

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Section 28-1600, Arizona Revised
Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE
28-1600.

Appeal

A. A party may appeal the judgment of the
court. The appeal may be to the superior court in the same manner as
provided by rules adopted by the supreme court.
If
the appeal is granted, the court shall report the stay of enforcement of the
judgment to the department. on receipt of the report, the department
may not pursue any administrative action related to the judgment issued by the
court until the stay is lifted or the judgment is affirmed by an appellate
court.

B. The posting of an appeal bond stays enforcement
of the judgment.

C. Commissioners of the superior court may hear and
determine appeals.
END_STATUTE

APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR JUNE 4, 2026.

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE JUNE 5, 2026.