Back to Arizona

HB2858 • 2026

state contracting; businesses

HB2858 - state contracting; businesses

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Walt Blackman
Last action
2026-01-22
Official status
House second read
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Checked against official source text during the last sync.

Arizona Bid Preference for In-State Businesses

This bill requires Arizona state agencies to give a one percent preference to in-state bidders when awarding contracts through competitive bidding processes, under certain conditions.

What This Bill Does

  • Gives an Arizona bidder a one percent price advantage over out-of-state bidders if there are two or more bids that are identical in all important aspects.
  • Requires the Department of Administration to publish a list each year showing which states give preferences to their own businesses and by how much.
  • Allows purchasing agencies to use this information when deciding who gets contracts without worrying about legal problems.
  • Limits the preference if it would make the contract more expensive for Arizona.
  • Does not apply to purchase orders over $1,500,000 in a fiscal year.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Arizona state agencies that award contracts through competitive bidding processes
  • Businesses bidding on Arizona state contracts

Terms To Know

bidder
A company or individual who submits a proposal to win a contract.
purchase order
An official document that orders goods or services from a supplier and commits state money for the purchase.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not apply to contracts over $1,500,000 in a fiscal year.
  • It is unclear how this will affect businesses outside of Arizona that bid on contracts.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Plain English: Adopted 1

  • The official amendment file could not be read automatically during the last sync, so only the official amendment metadata is shown right now.

Plain English: Fifty-seventh Legislature Government Second Regular Session H.B.

  • Fifty-seventh Legislature Government Second Regular Session H.B.
  • 2858 PROPOSED HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
  • 2858 (Reference to printed bill) The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows: 1 Section 1.
  • Title 41, chapter 23, article 1, Arizona Revised 2 Statutes, is amended by adding section 41-2505, to read: 3 41-2505.
  • This amendment summary is using official source text because generated interpretation was skipped for this run.

Bill History

  1. 2026-01-22 House

    House second read

  2. 2026-01-21 House

    House Rules: None

  3. 2026-01-21 House

    House Government: DPA

  4. 2026-01-21 House

    House first read

Official Summary Text

HB2858 - 572R - House Bill Summary

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

57th
Legislature, 2nd Regular Session

Majority Research Staff

House:
GOV DPA 6-0-1-0

HB
2858
: state contracting; businesses

Sponsor:
Representative Blackman, LD 7

Caucus
& COW

Overview

Establishes
and outlines procedures for a bid preference framework for in-state
procurement.

History

The Arizona Procurement Code and procurement process is
overseen by the Arizona Department of Administration (ADOA) whose Director
serves as the central procurement officer of Arizona. The Director is required
to: 1) procure or supervise the procurement of all materials, services and
construction needed by the state; 2) establish guidelines for the management of
all state material inventories; 3) sell, trade or otherwise dispose of surplus
state materials; 4) establish programs for the inspection, testing and
acceptance of materials, services and construction; and 5) employ staff, adopt
rules and provide consultation as necessary to effectuate the Arizona
Procurement Code (
A.R.S. �
41-2511
).

Provisions

1.

Requires an
Arizona bidder for contracts issued for competitive sealed bidding to be given
a one percent increase over an out-of-state bidder if there are two or more low
responsible and responsive bids from qualified bidders that are identical in
all material respects, including price, quality, delivery terms, warranties,
past performance and compliance with specifications. (Sec. 1)

2.

Directs a
purchasing agency to add a percentage increase to the bid of an out-of-state
bidder equal to the percentage, if any, of the preference given to the bidder
in the state where they reside. (Sec. 1)

3.

Instructs
ADOA to annually publish a list of states that give preference to in-state
bidders with the percentage increase applied in each state by January 1. (Sec.
1)

4.

Allows a
purchasing agency to rely on the names of states and percentages published by
ADOA in determining the lowest responsible bidder without incurring any
liability to any bidder. (Sec. 1)

5.

Stipulates
the percentage increase authorized by this legislation:

a.

applies solely
for the purposes of bid evaluation and does not require the award of a purchase
order to any bidder; and

b.

cannot be
applied if it would result in a higher actual price when determining the true
value paid by Arizona for a contract. (Sec. 1)

6.

States that
this legislation does not apply to purchase orders issued by a purchasing
agency that, in the aggregate, exceed $1,500,000 in a fiscal year. (Sec. 1)

7.

Defines
pertinent terms. (Sec. 1)

8.

Contains
legislative findings. (Sec. 2)

Amendments

Committee on
Government

1.

Changes the bid
preference framework if there are two or more responsive bids from qualified
bidders that are identical in materials, the contract must go to the Arizona
bidder.

2.

3.

4.

---------- DOCUMENT
FOOTER ---------

5.

Initials ML���������������������� HB
2858

6.

2/12/2026� Page 0 Caucus
& COW

7.

8.

---------- DOCUMENT
FOOTER ---------

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HB2858 - 572R - I Ver

REFERENCE TITLE:
state contracting; businesses

State of Arizona

House of Representatives

Fifty-seventh Legislature

Second Regular Session

2026

HB 2858

Introduced by

Representative
Blackman

AN
ACT

Amending title 41, chapter 23, article 1,
Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 41-2505; relating to procurement.

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Title 41, chapter 23, article 1,
Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 41-2505, to read:

START_STATUTE
41-2505.

Contracts; in-state; purchasing agency; definitions

A. NOTWITHSTANDING any other law, For
contracts issued pursuant to section 41-2533, an Arizona bidder shall be given
a one percent increase over an out-of-state bidder if there are two or more low
responsible and responsive bids from qualified bidders that are identical in
all material respects, including price, quality, delivery terms, warranties,
past performance and compliance with specifications.

B. A purchasing agency shall add a
percentage increase to the bid of an out-of-state bidder equal to the
percentage, if any, of the preference given to the bidder in the state in which
the bidder resides. On or before january 1 of each year, the department shall
publish a list of states that give preference to in-state bidders with the
percentage increase applied in each state. A purchasing agency may rely on the
names of states and percentages published in determining the lowest responsible
bidder without incurring any liability to any bidder.

C. The percentage increase authorized
by this section applies solely for purposes of bid evaluation and does not
require the award of a purchase order to any bidder.

D. The percentage increase authorized
by this section may not be applied if it would result in a higher actual price
when determining the true value paid by this state for a contract.

E. This section does not apply to
purchase orders issued by a purchasing agency that, in the aggregate, exceed
$1,500,000 in a fiscal year.

F. For the purposes of this section:

1. "arizona bidder" means a
bidder who meets all of the following:

(
a
) Is
authorized to transact business in this state.

(
b
) Has paid
all assessed taxes in this state.

(
c
) Maintains
its headquarters in this state for at least twelve consecutive months before
submitting a bid.� The requirement of this subdivision does not apply if the
bidder employs five hundred or more full-time residents of this state who are
provided health care benefits through the employer.

2. "headquarters" means a
principal central administrative office where primary headquarters-related
functions and services are performed, including financial, personnel,
administrative, legal, planning and similar business functions.

3. "purchase order" means a
written or electronic authorization issued by a purchasing agency to a vendor
that obligates state monies for acquiring goods or services, whether issued
under a statewide, agency, or cooperative contract or as a stand-alone
procurement.
END_STATUTE

Sec. 2.
Legislative findings

The
legislature finds:

1. Arizona small and
locally based businesses are a foundational component of this state's economy,
employing a substantial portion of Arizona's private sector workforce and
contributing to job creation and long-term economic stability in this state.

2. In Arizona, small
businesses account for approximately ninety-nine percent of all
businesses in this state and employ approximately one million one hundred
thousand Arizonans, representing about forty-two percent of the state's
workforce.

3. These businesses
contribute substantially to job creation, especially in rural Arizona, with
small enterprises generating tens of thousands of new jobs and serving as a
critical engine of employment growth, innovation and economic resilience.

4. The economic impact of
Arizona-based small businesses extends beyond employment, supporting state and
local tax revenues, consumer spending and community stability throughout this
state.

5. Ensuring that state
procurement dollars circulate within Arizona's economy enhances long-term
economic stability and opportunity for Arizona business owners and workers
statewide.

6. Ensuring meaningful
participation by Arizona-based businesses in state procurement strengthens the
state's supplier base, enhances accountability and supports employers that pay
state and local taxes and that employ Arizona residents.

7. This state has a
legitimate interest in encouraging qualified Arizona businesses to compete for
state procurement opportunities, without restricting competition or excluding
qualified bidders from other jurisdictions.

8. Reciprocal preference
provisions are designed to neutralize interstate procurement advantages,
preventing Arizona taxpayers from being disadvantaged by procurement
preferences adopted in other states while maintaining an open and competitive
bidding process consistent with the United State Constitution's commerce clause
and Arizona Constitution.

9. These findings and
policies are consistent with the state's authority to structure procurement in
a manner that protects taxpayers, promotes fiscal responsibility and ensures
equitable treatment of in-state businesses, while respecting constitutional
limits and the principles of interstate commerce.