Back to Arizona

HB2970 • 2026

fraudulent schemes; artifices; jurisdiction

HB2970 - fraudulent schemes; artifices; jurisdiction

Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Neal Carter
Last action
2026-03-31
Official status
Senate minority caucus
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source material does not provide specific details on enforcement mechanisms or potential impacts of the legislation.

Fraudulent Schemes and Artifices; Jurisdiction

This bill changes Arizona law so that prosecutors only need to prove one act of fraud occurred in Arizona for a case to be valid, regardless of where other acts took place.

What This Bill Does

  • Changes the requirement for prosecution from needing all unlawful acts to occur within Arizona or a single city/town/county/local jurisdiction to just requiring at least one act to have taken place there.
  • Specifies that it is not a defense if some acts of fraud did not take place in Arizona or within a specific local jurisdiction.

Who It Names or Affects

  • People who commit fraud or are suspected of committing fraud in Arizona.
  • Prosecutors handling cases involving fraudulent schemes and artifices.

Terms To Know

Scheme
A plan or method to achieve a goal, often used when talking about illegal activities like fraud.
Artifice
A clever trick or device used to deceive someone, especially in the context of committing fraud.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify how it will be enforced or what resources will be provided for enforcement.
  • It is unclear if this change will lead to more successful prosecutions or have other unintended consequences.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Plain English: NM 2/23/2026 (602) 926-3848 ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FLOOR AMENDMENT EXPLANATION 57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session Majority Research Staff HB 2970: fraudulent schemes; artifices; jurisdiction CARTER N FLOOR AMENDMENT 1.

  • NM 2/23/2026 (602) 926-3848 ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FLOOR AMENDMENT EXPLANATION 57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session Majority Research Staff HB 2970: fraudulent schemes; artifices; jurisdiction CARTER N FLOOR AMENDMENT 1.
  • Specifies that in a prosecution for fraudulent schemes and artifices, the state is only required to establish that one of the acts which constitute the violation occurred within Arizona or one of its subdivisions.
  • Fifty-seventh Legislature Carter N Second Regular Session H.B.
  • 2970 ADDITIONAL COW CARTER N FLOOR AMENDMENT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
  • This amendment summary is using official source text because generated interpretation was skipped for this run.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-31 Senate

    Senate minority caucus

  2. 2026-03-31 Senate

    Senate majority caucus

  3. 2026-03-30 Senate

    Senate consent calendar

  4. 2026-03-10 Senate

    Senate second read

  5. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Senate Rules: PFC

  6. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Senate Judiciary and Elections: DP

  7. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Senate first read

  8. 2026-02-26 Senate

    Transmitted to Senate

  9. 2026-02-26 House

    House third read passed

  10. 2026-02-24 House

    House amended committee of the whole

  11. 2026-02-24 House

    House passed

  12. 2026-02-17 House

    House minority caucus

  13. 2026-02-17 House

    House majority caucus

  14. 2026-02-16 House

    House consent calendar

  15. 2026-02-03 House

    House second read

  16. 2026-02-02 House

    House Rules: C&P

  17. 2026-02-02 House

    House Judiciary: DP

  18. 2026-02-02 House

    House first read

Official Summary Text

HB2970 - 572R - Senate Fact Sheet

Assigned to
JUDE������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ FOR
COMMITTEE

ARIZONA STATE SENATE

Fifty-Seventh
Legislature, Second Regular Session

FACT SHEET FOR
H.B. 2970

fraudulent schemes;
artifices; jurisdiction

Purpose

Stipulates that,
in a prosecution for fraudulent schemes or artifices, the state is not required
to establish that all of the unlawful acts occurred in Arizona or within a
single city, town, county or local jurisdiction of Arizona, and that it is not
a defense that not all of the unlawful acts occurred in Arizona or within
political subdivisions of Arizona.

Background

A person who, in
accordance with a scheme or artifice to defraud, knowingly obtains any benefit
by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises or
material omissions is guilty of a class 2 felony. Reliance on the part of any
person is not a necessary element of an offense. A person convicted of a
violation involving a benefit with a value of $100,000 or greater, or a
violation involving the manufacture, sale or marketing of opioids, is not
eligible for a suspension of sentence, probation, pardon or release from
confinement on any basis unless otherwise authorized. A scheme or artifice to
defraud includes a scheme or artifice to deprive a person of the intangible
right of honest services (
A.R.S.
� 13-2310
). In determining the classification of the offense, the state may
aggregate the indictment or information amounts taken in thefts committed in
accordance with one scheme or course of conduct, whether the amounts were taken
from one or several persons (
A.R.S.
� 13-1801
).

For a first-time
felony offender, a class 2 felony carries a presumptive imprisonment sentence
of 5 years and a fine of not more than $150,000 to be determined by the court
(A.R.S.

��
13-702

and
13-801
).

There is no
anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this
legislation.

Provisions

1.

Stipulates that, in a prosecution for fraudulent schemes and artifices,
the state is only required to establish that one of the acts that constitute a
violation occurred in Arizona or within a single city, town, county or local
jurisdiction of Arizona.

2.

Stipulates that, in a prosecution for fraudulent schemes and artifices,
the state is not required to establish that all of the acts that constitute a
violation occurred in Arizona or within a single city, town, county or local
jurisdiction of Arizona.

3.

Specifies that it is not a defense that not all of the acts that
constitute the offense occurred in Arizona or within a single city, town,
county or local jurisdiction of Arizona.

4.

Makes technical and conforming changes.

5.

Becomes effective on the general effective date.

House Action

JUD���������������� 2/11/26����� DP������ 6-3-0-0

3
rd
Read��������� 2/26/26����������������� 31-22-7

Prepared by Senate Research

March 20, 2026

ZD/ci

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HB2970 - 572R - H Ver

House Engrossed

fraudulent schemes;
artifices; jurisdiction

State of Arizona

House of Representatives

Fifty-seventh Legislature

Second Regular Session

2026

HOUSE BILL 2970

AN
ACT

AMENDING SECTION 13-2310, ARIZONA REVISED
STATUTES; RELATING TO FRAUDULENT

SCHEMES AND ARTIFICES.

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

Be it
enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Section 13-2310, Arizona Revised
Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE
13-2310.

Fraudulent schemes and artifices; classification; definition

A.
Any

A
person
who, pursuant to a scheme or artifice to defraud, knowingly obtains any benefit
by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises or
material omissions is guilty of a class 2 felony.

B. Reliance on the part of any person shall not be a
necessary element of the offense described in subsection A of this section.

C. A person who is convicted of a violation of this
section that involved a benefit with a value of
one hundred
thousand dollars

$100,000
or more or the
manufacture, sale or marketing of opioids is not eligible for suspension of
sentence, probation, pardon or release from confinement on any basis except
pursuant to section 31-233, subsection A or B until the sentence imposed
by the court has been served, the person is eligible for release pursuant to
section 41-1604.07 or the sentence is commuted.

D. This state shall apply the aggregation prescribed
by section 13-1801, subsection B to violations of this section in
determining the applicable punishment.

E. In a prosecution for a violation
of this section,
this state is only required to establish
that one of the acts that constitutes a violation of this section occurred in
this state or within a single city, town, county or local jurisdiction of this
state. this state is not required to establish that all of the acts
that constitute the violation of this section occurred in this state or within
a single city, town, county or local jurisdiction of this state. It
is not a defense to a prosecution for a violation of this section that not all
of the acts that constitute the violation of this section occurred in this
state or within a single city, town, county or local jurisdiction of this
state.

E.

F.
For
the purposes of this section, "scheme or artifice to defraud"
includes a scheme or artifice to deprive a person of the intangible right of
honest services.
END_STATUTE