Back to Arizona

HB2995 • 2026

domestic relations; domestic violence

HB2995 - domestic relations; domestic violence

Children Education Firearms
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Lisa Fink
Last action
2026-04-14
Official status
Senate minority caucus
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Checked against official source text during the last sync.

Domestic Relations; Domestic Violence

This bill changes Arizona's laws about legal decision-making and parenting time when there is an allegation of domestic violence.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires courts to consider evidence of domestic violence as being contrary to the best interests of a child in legal decision-making or parenting time matters.
  • Sets a presumption that awarding sole or joint legal decision-making to a parent who has committed domestic violence is not in the child's best interest, unless rebutted by the parent.
  • Requires courts to consider specific factors when determining if a parent has committed an act of domestic violence and whether they have successfully completed programs like batterer’s prevention or alcohol/drug counseling.
  • Allows courts to impose conditions on parenting time to protect children and victims from further harm, such as supervised exchanges or restrictions on the use of alcohol or controlled substances before parenting time.
  • Requires detailed findings by the court regarding domestic violence claims in legal decision-making or parenting time matters.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Courts handling legal decision-making and parenting time cases involving allegations of domestic violence
  • Parents involved in legal disputes over child custody who have a history of domestic violence

Terms To Know

Domestic Violence
Behavior that includes physical, sexual, or emotional abuse between family members or household members.
Legal Decision-Making
The authority to make important decisions about a child's health, education, and welfare.

Limits and Unknowns

  • Does not specify the exact fiscal impact on state funds.
  • Details of how courts will enforce conditions on parenting time are not fully outlined in this bill.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Plain English: Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.

  • Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
  • 2995 (Reference to printed bill) The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows: 1 Section 1.
  • Section 25-403.03, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended 2 to read: 3 25-403.03.
  • Domestic violence and child abuse; court 4 considerations; definitions 5 A.
  • This amendment summary is using official source text because generated interpretation was skipped for this run.

Plain English: Fifty-seventh Legislature Judiciary Second Regular Session H.B.

  • Fifty-seventh Legislature Judiciary Second Regular Session H.B.
  • 2995 PROPOSED HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
  • 2995 (Reference to printed bill) The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows: 1 Section 1.
  • Section 25-403.03, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended 2 to read: 3 25-403.03.
  • This amendment summary is using official source text because generated interpretation was skipped for this run.

Plain English: Fifty-seventh Legislature Federalism Second Regular Session H.B.

  • Fifty-seventh Legislature Federalism Second Regular Session H.B.
  • 2995 COMMITTEE ON FEDERALISM AND FAMILY LAW SENATE AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
  • 2995 (Reference to House engrossed bill) The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows: 1 Section 1.
  • Section 25-403.03, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended 2 to read: 3 25-403.03.
  • This amendment summary is using official source text because generated interpretation was skipped for this run.

Plain English: Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session Federalism and Family Law H.B.

  • Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session Federalism and Family Law H.B.
  • 2995 PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
  • 2995 (Reference to House engrossed bill) The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows: 1 Section 1.
  • Section 25-403.03, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended 2 to read: 3 25-403.03.
  • This amendment summary is using official source text because generated interpretation was skipped for this run.

Bill History

  1. 2026-04-14 Senate

    Senate minority caucus

  2. 2026-04-14 Senate

    Senate majority caucus

  3. 2026-03-10 Senate

    Senate second read

  4. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Senate Rules: PFC

  5. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Senate Federalism-Archived and Renamed Federalism and Family Law as of 03/10/2026: DPA

  6. 2026-03-09 Senate

    Senate first read

  7. 2026-02-26 Senate

    Transmitted to Senate

  8. 2026-02-26 House

    House third read passed

  9. 2026-02-25 House

    House committee of the whole

  10. 2026-02-24 House

    House minority caucus

  11. 2026-02-24 House

    House majority caucus

  12. 2026-02-10 House

    House second read

  13. 2026-02-09 House

    House Rules: C&P

  14. 2026-02-09 House

    House Judiciary: DPA

  15. 2026-02-09 House

    House first read

Official Summary Text

HB2995 - 572R - Senate Fact Sheet

Assigned to
FFL������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� AS
PASSED BY COMMITTEE

ARIZONA STATE SENATE

Fifty-Seventh
Legislature, Second Regular Session

AMENDED

FACT SHEET FOR
H.B. 2995

domestic
relations; domestic violence

Purpose

Revises the
statutory requirements that apply to a legal decision-making or parenting time
matter or a modification of a legal decision-making or parenting time matter when
there is an allegation of domestic violence.

Background

Joint legal
decision-making may not be awarded if the court makes a finding of significant
domestic violence or that there has been a significant history of domestic
violence. The court must consider evidence of domestic violence as being
contrary to the best interests of the child and consider the safety and
well-being of the child and the victim of the domestic violence to be of
primary importance. To determine if a person has committed domestic violence,
the court must consider: 1) findings from another court of competent
jurisdiction; 2) police reports; 3) medical reports; 4) records of the
Department of Child Safety (DCS); 5) domestic violence shelter records; 6)
school records; and 7) witness testimony.

If the court
determines that a parent who is seeking sole or joint legal decision-making has
committed an act of domestic violence against the other parent, then, unless
both parents have committed an act of domestic violence, there is a rebuttable
presumption that an award of sole or joint legal decision-making to the parent
who committed the act of domestic violence is contrary to the child's best
interests. A person commits an act of domestic violence if the person:

1) intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes or attempts to cause sexual
assault or serious physical injury; 2) places a person in reasonable
apprehension of imminent serious physical injury to any person; or 3) engages
in a pattern of behavior for which a court may issue an ex parte order to
protect the other parent who is seeking child custody or to protect the child
and the child's siblings. To determine if the parent has rebutted the
presumption the court must consider whether the parent: 1) has demonstrated
that being awarded sole or joint legal decision-making or substantially equal
parenting time is in the child's best interests; 2) has successfully completed
a batterer's prevention program; 3) has successfully completed a program of
alcohol or drug abuse counseling, if appropriate; 4) has successfully completed
a parenting class, if appropriate; 5) is restrained by a protective order that
was granted after a hearing, if the parent is on probation, parole or community
supervision; and 6) has committed any further acts of domestic violence.

If the court
finds that a parent has committed an act of domestic violence, then that parent
has the burden of proving to the court's satisfaction that the parenting time
will not endanger the child or significantly impair the child's emotional
development.
If the parent meets the burden of proof to
the court's satisfaction, then the court must place conditions on parenting
time that best protect the child and the other parent from further harm. The
court may: 1) order that an exchange of the child must occur in a protected
setting as specified by the court; 2)
o
rder that
a family or household member or an agency specified by the court must supervise
parenting time; 3) order the parent who committed the act of domestic violence
to attend and complete a program of intervention for perpetrators of domestic
violence and any other counseling the court orders;

4) order the parent who committed the act of domestic violence to abstain from
possessing or consuming alcohol or controlled substances for up to 24 hours before
parenting time;

5) order the parent who committed the act of domestic violence to pay a fee for
the costs of supervised parenting time; 6) prohibit overnight parenting time;
7) require a bond from the parent who committed the act of domestic violence
for the child's safe return; 8) order that the address of the child and the
other parent remain confidential; or 9) impose any other condition that the
court determines is necessary (
A.R.S.
� 25-403.03
).

There is no
anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this
legislation.

Provisions

1.

Requires the court, in any legal decision-making or parenting time
matter, to consider domestic violence as contrary to the best interest of the
child and assign primary importance to the safety and well-being of the child
and domestic violence victim.

2.

Stipulates that, if an express or implied conflict arises between the
prescribed requirements for the court's considerations of domestic violence and
a competing presumption, mandate or public policy in statute that is not
directly related to a child's safety, then the provisions of the prescribed
requirements for the court's considerations of domestic violence take priority.

3.

Requires the court, in a modification of a legal decision-making or
parenting time proceeding, to decide a new allegation of domestic violence by
applying the same public policy, priorities, procedures and definition prescribed
pursuant to statutory requirements for considering an allegation of domestic
violence.

4.

Stipulates that a parent who has been adjudicated to have committed
domestic violence and who previously failed to rebut the rebuttable presumption
remains subject to the same presumption in any modification proceeding
regardless of the allegations that are made in the new modification pleadings.

5.

Requires the question of whether evidence now exists to overcome the
rebuttable presumption to be resolved as a preliminary matter when the court
decides whether a sufficient change of circumstances has occurred to allow a
modification of a legal decision-making or parenting time order.

6.

Requires the court to make written findings regarding an allegation of
domestic violence, if a party to a proceeding for a temporary order for legal
decision-making or parenting time alleges that the other party committed
domestic violence.

7.

Requires the court, in any legal decision-making or parenting time
matter, to make specific and detailed findings on the record about each
outlined factor and that is presented through evidence admitted at a trial or
other evidentiary hearing.

8.

Requires
the court's findings to address:

a)

a complete description of the evidence that justified or prevented a
finding that domestic violence occurred;

b)

a full explanation why the evidence presented to determine whether the
parent who committed domestic violence has rebutted the rebuttable presumption
did or did not rebut the rebuttable presumption
; and

c)

an
explanation why the court's choice of remedies on parenting time is in the
child's best interests.

9.

Requires a claim of domestic violence to be established by a
preponderance of the evidence.

10.

Specifies
that corroboration from exhibits or witness testimony is not required.

11.

Requires the court, subject
to the evidentiary standard pursuant to the Arizona Rules of Family Law
procedure, to consider:

a)

factual determinations of an act of domestic
violence from a court of competent jurisdiction;

b)

evidence that is collected and reports that are prepared by a law
enforcement agency, DCS and any other government agency;

c)

the alleged victim's medical or behavioral health records, if the victim
waives the associated privilege or other right to confidentiality;

d)

records from a shelter for victims of domestic violence;

e)

educational and school records;

f)

a collateral act of domestic violence against any person by the parent
who is the subject of the allegation of committing domestic violence; and

g)

witness
testimony.

12.

Requires
the court, if the court determines that a parent committed an act of domestic
violence, to consider and weigh all outlined nonexclusive factors and any other
relevant considerations when entering an award of legal decision-making, a
parenting time schedule and other features of the parenting plan.

13.

Requires the court to
determine whether the act of domestic violence:

a)

risked or inflicted physical injury or emotional trauma on the other
parent or child;

b)

involved the threat or use of a firearm or other dangerous weapon;

c)

involved the threat or use of strangulation;

d)

involved multiple forms of coercive control,
including whether physical violence, regardless of how infrequent, was used to
intensify the impact of other forms of coercive control;

e)

compromised the victim's education, employment or career goal;

f)

significantly damaged the victim's reputation or relationships with
family, friends or others;

g)

created a question as to whether the parent who committed domestic
violence can serve as a suitable role model for the child, including with
respect to parenting time;

h)

revealed a disdain for the other parent or child that would complicate
or prevent effective legal decision-making;

i)

is denied, deflected or minimized during treatment, forensic assessment,
formal discovery or courtroom proceedings by the parent who committed the domestic
violence; or

j)

occurred
over a period of time and with a sufficient severity or frequency that the
passage of time or remoteness of an earlier act of domestic violence constitute
an aggravating and not a mitigating factor.

14.

Requires
the court to consider a collateral act of domestic violence if the collateral
act tends to prove the existence of coercive control, even if the collateral act
of domestic violence has been decided, predates the last decree or could have
been litigated at another time or place.

15.

Stipulates
that, if the court determines that a parent committed an act of domestic
violence, there is a rebuttable presumption that an award of legal decision
making or parenting time to the parent who committed the act of domestic
violence is contrary to the child's best interests.

16.

Prohibits
the court from requiring the victim or child to prove that shared legal

decision-making or parenting time would harm the child.

17.

Stipulates
that, if the court finds that both parents have committed domestic violence,
then each parent is subject to the rebuttable presumption, and if nether parent
can rebut the rebuttable presumption, then the court must consider referring
the child for dependency proceedings if a referral is consistent with the best
interest of the child.

18.

Requires the court, to
determine whether the parent who committed an act of domestic violence has
rebutted the rebuttable presumption, to:

a)

review the considerations that are prescribed by statute for entering an
award of legal decision-making or parenting time when the court determines that
a parent committed domestic violence and make findings and a full explanation as
to why the evidence presented to determine whether the parent who committed
domestic violence has rebutted the rebuttable presumption did or did not rebut
the rebuttable presumption;

b)

consider a collateral act of domestic violence by the parent against
anyone;

c)

not treat the following considerations as mitigation or relevant to the
rebuttal of the rebuttable presumption:

i.

the child's absence from the location where the act of domestic violence
occurred;

ii.

the
child's unawareness that a parent committed the act of domestic violence; and

iii.

the child's
preference for reinstating, maintaining or increasing parenting time with a
parent who committed the act of domestic violence;

d)

consider the parent's attendance at a domestic violence treatment
program; and

e)

evaluate
whether a parent's chosen treatment program was relevant and proportionate to
the parent's history of domestic violence.

19.

Prohibits
the court from considering a certificate of completion for a domestic violence
program alone as proof of rehabilitation.

20.

Requires a parent who wishes
to use attendance at a domestic violence treatment program as rebuttal evidence
to:

a)

waive the associated statutory privilege or other confidentiality
necessary to release the parent's treatment records to the court and the
victim;

b)

establish that the treatment program was relevant and proportionate to
the act of domestic violence for which the parent was adjudicated;

c)

demonstrate an understanding of how the parent's act of domestic
violence harmed the family; and

d)

prove that the treatment program addressed and helped reduce any
tendency to minimize or rationalize the act of domestic violence.

21.

Requires the court, when
evaluating whether a parent's chosen treatment program was relevant and
proportionate to the parent's history of domestic violence, to consider the
criteria outlined in the Arizona Administrative Code that governs treatment
standards for misdemeanor domestic violence offenders.

22.

Requires the court, if the
parent who committed an act of domestic violence fails to overcome the rebuttable
presumption, to:

a)

not grant joint or sole legal decision-making to that parent; and

b)

impose restrictions on the manner and frequency of that parent's
interactions with the child that are consistent with the proven act of domestic
violence.

23.

Prescribes the restrictions
that the court may order, including:

a)

ordering that an exchange of the child occur in a protected location or
a safe exchange location that is specified by the court;

b)

limiting parenting time, including a prohibition on overnight parenting
time with the child;

c)

designating a professional agency or one or more persons to supervise
parenting time;

d)

ordering the parent who committed the act of domestic violence to pay a
fee for the costs of supervised parenting time;

e)

suspending access to the child, in any form, until
the parent who committed an act of domestic violence can petition for a
modification of legal decision-making or parenting time;

f)

ordering the parent who committed the act of domestic violence to attend
and complete a program of intervention for perpetrators of domestic violence
and any other counseling the court orders;

g)

ordering a parent to abstain from possessing or consuming alcohol, other
intoxicants or controlled substances, if the court finds that the parent who
committed the act of domestic violence has also abused alcohol, other
intoxicants or controlled substances;

h)

requiring a bond for the child's safe return from the parent who
committed the act of domestic violence;

i)

ordering that the address of the child and other parent remain
confidential; or

j)

imposing any other condition that the court determines is necessary to
protect the child, the other parent any other family or household member.

24.

Prohibits the court from
ordering a victim of domestic violence, whether the child or a parent, to join
the parent who committed domestic violence in any inpatient or outpatient
treatment program, counseling program or forensic assessment, whether
telephonic, virtual or in person.

25.

Stipulates that, if a parent
who is adjudicated to have committed domestic violence fails to overcome the
rebuttable presumption, then the rebuttable presumption must remain until a
subsequent modification of a legal decision-making or parenting time
proceeding.

26.

Prohibits the court from
appointing a person to supervise parenting time unless the parent being
supervised affirms to the court that the appointed supervisor will:

a)

receive and read the court's order;

b)

provide a reliable telephone number, email address and residential
address to both parents;

c)

intervene and contact an appropriate law enforcement agency, DCS and the
other parent if the supervised parent's behavior endangers the child of becomes
psychologically abusive; and

d)

appear
for future court proceedings and testify regarding the supervision.

27.

Defines
coercive control
as
a pattern of threatening, humiliating or intimidating actions that are used to
harm, punish or frighten a person and includes:

a)

a pattern of behavior that takes away a person's liberty or freedom;

b)

stripping a person's sense of self, bodily integrity and human rights;

c)

isolating a person from friends and family;

d)

depriving a person of independence;

e)

regulating a person's everyday behavior;

f)

monitoring, surveilling, regulating or controlling a person's finances,
economic resources or access to services, or those of the person's child or
relative;

g)

monitoring, surveilling, regulating or controlling
a person's activities, communications or movements, including through the use
of technology, or those of the person's child or relative;

h)

name-calling, degrading or demeaning a person or the person's child or
relative on a frequent basis;

i)

threatening to harm or kill a person or the person's child or relative,
including wearing, accessing, displaying, using or cleaning a weapon in an
intimidating or threatening manner;

j)

threatening to commit suicide or self-harm, when used as a method of
coercion, control, punishment, intimidation or retaliation against a person;

k)

threatening to harm or kill an animal that a person or the person's
child or relative has an emotional bond with;

l)

threatening to publish a person's sensitive personal information,
including sexually explicit material, or those of the person's child or
relative;

m)

threatening
to make reports to law enforcement authorities without reasonable cause;

n)

damaging a person's property or household goods, or those of the
person's child or relative;

o)

threatening a person or the person's child or relative with deportation,
contacting authorities based on perceived or actual immigration status,
withholding essential documents required for immigration or threatening to
withdraw or interfere with an active immigration application or process; and

p)

forcing a person or the
person's child or relative to take part in criminal activities or child abuse.

28.

Defines

collateral act
as conduct that, in time, location, sequence and
causation, is substantially distinct from the occurrences or acts at issue
before the court.

29.

Defines

domestic violence
as domestic violence or coercive control when
perpetrated one parent against the other parent or against a minor child living
in either parent's household and does not include defense of self or another if
the defensive acts were proportionate to the assault and the parent claiming
self-defense did not provoke the altercation.

30.

Designates
this legislation as the
Alec and Lydia Act
.

31.

Makes
technical and conforming changes.

32.

Becomes
effective on the general effective date.

Amendments Adopted by
Committee

1.

Modifies the factors that the court must address when reviewing an
allegation of domestic violence.

2.

Modifies the requirements for awarding a modification of legal
decision-making or parenting time when there is an allegation of domestic
violence.

3.

Makes technical and conforming changes.

House Action
���������������������������������������������������������
Senate
Action

JUD���������������� 2/18/26����� DPA��� 8-0-1-0�������������� FFL���������������� 3/23/26����� DPA���������� 4-3-0

3
rd
Read��������� 2/26/26����������������� 52-0-8

Prepared by Senate Research

March 31, 2026

AN/ci

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
HB2995 - 572R - H Ver

House Engrossed

domestic relations;
domestic violence

State of Arizona

House of Representatives

Fifty-seventh Legislature

Second Regular Session

2026

HOUSE BILL 2995

AN
ACT

amending sections 25-403.03, 25-404
and 25-411, arizona revised statutes; relating to legal decision-making
and parenting time.

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

Be it
enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Section 25-403.03, Arizona Revised
Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE
25-403.03.

Domestic violence and child abuse; court considerations;
definitions

A. Notwithstanding subsection D of
this section, joint legal decision-making shall not be awarded if the
court makes a finding of the existence of significant domestic violence
pursuant to section 13-3601 or if the court finds by a preponderance of
the evidence that there has been a significant history of domestic violence.

B. The court shall consider evidence
of domestic violence as being contrary to the best interests of the child.� The
court shall consider the safety and well-being of the child and of the
victim of the act of domestic violence to be of primary
importance. The court shall consider a perpetrator's history of
causing or threatening to cause physical harm to another person.

C. To determine if a person has
committed an act of domestic violence the court, subject to the rules of
evidence, shall consider all relevant factors including the following:

1. Findings from another court of
competent jurisdiction.

2. Police reports.

3. Medical reports.

4. Records of the department of child
safety.

5. Domestic violence shelter records.

6. School records.

7. Witness testimony.

D. If the court determines that a
parent who is seeking sole or joint legal decision-making has committed an act
of domestic violence against the other parent, there is a rebuttable
presumption that an award of sole or joint legal decision-making to the parent
who committed the act of domestic violence is contrary to the child's best
interests.� This presumption does not apply if both parents have committed an
act of domestic violence.� For the purposes of this subsection, a person
commits an act of domestic violence if that person does any of the following:

1. Intentionally, knowingly or
recklessly causes or attempts to cause sexual assault or serious physical
injury.

2. Places a person in reasonable
apprehension of imminent serious physical injury to any person.

3. Engages in a pattern of behavior
for which a court may issue an ex parte order to protect the other parent who
is seeking child custody or to protect the child and the child's siblings.�

E. To determine if the parent has
rebutted the presumption the court shall consider all of the following:

1. Whether the parent has demonstrated
that being awarded sole or joint legal decision-making or substantially equal
parenting time is in the child's best interests.

2. Whether the parent has successfully
completed a batterer's prevention program.

3. Whether the parent has successfully
completed a program of alcohol or drug abuse counseling, if the court
determines that counseling is appropriate.

4. Whether the parent has successfully
completed a parenting class, if the court determines that a parenting class is
appropriate.

5. If the parent is on probation,
parole or community supervision, whether the parent is restrained by a
protective order that was granted after a hearing.

6. Whether the parent has committed
any further acts of domestic violence.

F. If the court finds that a parent
has committed an act of domestic violence, that parent has the burden of
proving to the court's satisfaction that parenting time will not endanger the
child or significantly impair the child's emotional development. If
the parent meets this burden to the court's satisfaction, the court shall place
conditions on parenting time that best protect the child and the other parent
from further harm. The court may:

1. Order that an exchange of the child
must occur in a protected setting as specified by the court.

2. Order that an agency specified by
the court must supervise parenting time. If the court allows a
family or household member to supervise parenting time, the court shall
establish conditions that this person must follow during parenting time.

3. Order the parent who committed the
act of domestic violence to attend and complete, to the court's satisfaction, a
program of intervention for perpetrators of domestic violence and any other
counseling the court orders.

4. Order the parent who committed the
act of domestic violence to abstain from possessing or consuming alcohol or
controlled substances during parenting time and for twenty-four hours
before parenting time.

5. Order the parent who committed the
act of domestic violence to pay a fee for the costs of supervised parenting
time.

6. Prohibit overnight parenting time.

7. Require a bond from the parent who
committed the act of domestic violence for the child's safe return.

8. Order that the address of the child
and the other parent remain confidential.

9. Impose any other condition that the
court determines is necessary to protect the child, the other parent and any
other family or household member.

G. The court shall not order joint
counseling between a victim and the perpetrator of domestic
violence. The court may provide a victim with written information
about available community resources related to domestic violence.

A. In any legal decision-making or
parenting time matter, The court shall consider domestic violence as contrary
to the best interests of the child and shall assign primary importance to the
safety and well-being of both the child and domestic violence victim.� If
an express or implied conflict arises between the requirements of this section
and a competing presumption, mandate or public policy in this title, the
provisions of this section take priority.

B. In any legal decision-making or
parenting time matter, The court shall make specific and detailed findings on
the record about each factor that is required by this section. The court shall
explain in detail why the court's findings regarding domestic violence serve
the child's best interests, including the presumption prescribed in subsection
F of this section and any rebuttal to the presumption that is offered pursuant
to subsection G of this section. On appeal, the legal sufficiency of each
finding and explanation shall be reviewed de novo. The court's findings must
address all of the following:

1. Coercive control.

2. Evidence that may support a
domestic violence claim.

3. The impact, severity and
circumstances of an act or acts of domestic violence that have occurred.

4. The mandatory presumption against
awarding legal decision-making or parenting time to a parent who has committed
an act or acts of domestic violence.

5. Whether a parent who has committed
an act or acts of domestic violence rebutted the mandatory presumption under
subsection F of this section.

C. A Claim of an act or acts of
domestic violence shall be established by a preponderance of the
evidence. corroboration from exhibits or witness testimony is not
required. Subject to the evidentiary standard applied to that proceeding
pursuant to the arizona rules of family law procedure, the court shall consider
all of the following:

1. Factual determinations of an act
or acts of domestic violence from a court of competent jurisdiction.

2. Evidence that is collected and
reports THAT are prepared by a law enforcement agency, the department of child
safety and any other government agency.

3. The alleged victim's medical or
behavioral health records, if the victim waives the associated privilege or
other right to confidentiality.

4. Records from a shelter for victims
of domestic violence as defined in section 36-3001.

5. Educational and school records.

6. A collateral act or acts of
domestic violence against any person by the parent who is the subject of the
allegation of committing an act or acts of domestic violence.

7. Witness testimony.

D. If the court determines that a
parent committed an act or acts of domestic violence, the court shall consider
and weigh all of the following nonexclusive factors, and any other relevant
considerations, when entering an award of legal decision-making, a parenting
time schedule and other features of the parenting plan required by section
25-403.02.� The court shall determine whether the act or acts of domestic
violence meet any of the following:

1. Risked or inflicted physical
injury or emotional trauma on the other parent or child.

2. Involved the threat or use of a
firearm or other dangerous weapon.

3. Involved the threat or use of
strangulation as described in section 13-1204, subsection B, paragraph 1.

4. Involved multiple forms of
coercive control, including whether physical violence, no matter how
infrequent, was used to intensify the impact of other forms of coercive
control.

5. Compromised the victim's
education, employment or career goals.

6. Significantly damaged the victim's
reputation or relationships with family, friends or others.

7. Created a question as to whether
the parent who committed the act or acts of domestic violence can serve as a
suitable role model for the child, including with respect to parenting time.

8. Revealed a disdain for the other
parent or child that would complicate or prevent effective legal
decision-making.

9. Are denied, deflected or minimized
during treatment, forensic assessment, formal discovery or courtroom
proceedings by the parent who committed the act or acts of domestic violence.

10. Occurred over a period of time
and with sufficient severity or frequency that the passage of time or
remoteness of an earlier act or acts of domestic violence constitute an
aggravating and not a mitigating factor.

E. When weighing evidence of a
collateral act or acts of domestic violence, the court may consider the passage
of time or prior judicial review.� The court MAY not refuse evidence of a
collateral act or acts of domestic violence on the grounds that the alleged act
or acts of domestic violence or A related legal claim has been decided,
predates the last decree or could have been litigated at another time or
place.� The court shall evaluate whether evidence of a collateral act or acts
of domestic violence doES any of the following:

1. Establishes recurring behavior by
the parent alleged to have committed an act or acts of domestic violence,
including coercive control.

2. Proves the motive, opportunity,
intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity or absence of mistake or
accident by the parent alleged to have committed an act or acts of domestic
violence.

3. Explains an otherwise excessive
response by the alleged victim to a more recent event as well as other reactive
or protective behavior by the alleged victim.

f. If the court determines that a
parent committed an act or acts of domestic violence, there is a mandatory
rebuttable presumption that an award of legal decision-making or parenting time
to the parent who committed the act or acts of domestic violence is contrary to
the child's best interests.� the court MAY not require the victim or child to
prove that shared legal decision-making or parenting time would harm the child.
A rebuttable presumption DOES NOT arise IF mutual acts of domestic violence
occurred.� The court may not describe an act or acts of domestic violence as
mutual or enter a legal decision-making or parenting time order that treats
domestic VIOLENCE as mutual, unless the evidence establishes that both parents
had the same motive for their actions, lacked justification to similar degrees
and inflicted comparable harm.

G. To determine whether the parent
who committed an act or acts of domestic violence has rebutted the mandatory
presumption prescribed in subsection f of the section, the court shall do all
of the following:

1. Review the court's findings
prescribed by subsection d of this section and apply the court's findings to
the rebuttal determination.

2. Consider a collateral act or acts
of domestic violence by the parent against anyone.

3. Not treat any of the following
considerations as mitigation or relevant to the rebuttal of the mandatory
presumption:

(
a
) The child's
absence from the location where the act or acts of domestic violence occurred.

(
b
) The child's
unawareness that a parent committed the act or acts of domestic violence.

(
c
) The child's
preference for reinstating, maintaining or increasing parenting time with a
parent who committed the act or acts of domestic violence.

4. Consider the parent's attendance
at a domestic violence treatment program.� The court may not consider a
certificate of completion alone as proof of rehabilitation.� A parent who
wishes to use attendance at a domestic violence treatment program as rebuttal
evidence must do all of the following:

(
a
) Waive the
associated statutory privilege or other confidentiality necessary to release
that person's treatment records to the court and the victim.

(
b
) Establish
that the treatment program was both relevant and proportionate to the act or
acts of domestic violence for which the parent was adjudicated.

(
c
) Demonstrate
an understanding of how the parent's act or acts of domestic violence harmed
the family.

(
d
) Prove that
the treatment program addressed and helped reduce any tendency to minimize or
rationalize the act or acts of domestic violence.

5. Evaluate whether a parent's chosen
treatment program was relevant and proportionate to that person's history of
domestic violence. In making this evaluation, the court shall consider the
criteria outlined in the Arizona administrative code that governs treatment
standards for misdemeanor domestic violence offenders.

H. If the parent who committed an act
or acts of domestic violence fails to overcome the mandatory presumption
prescribed in subsection F of this section, the court shall do all of the
following:

1. Not grant joint legal decision-making
or sole legal decision-making authority to that parent.

2. Impose restrictions on the manner
and frequency of that parent's interactions with the child that are consistent
with the proven act or acts of domestic violence, including any of the
following:

(
a
) Order that
an exchange of the child occur in a protected location or a safe exchange
location as prescribed in section 25-403.10 that is specified by the court.

(
b
) Limit
parenting time, including a prohibition on overnight parenting time with the
child.

(
c
) Designate a
professional agency or one or more persons to supervise parenting time.� The
court may not appoint the victim of the act or acts of domestic violence to
serve as the supervisor, whether alone or with another person. The
court may not appoint a person to supervise parenting time unless the parent
being supervised affirms to the court that the appointed supervisor will do all
of the following:

(
i
) Receive and
read the court's order.

(
ii
) Provide a
reliable telephone number, email address and residential address to both
parents.

(
iii
) Intervene
and contact an appropriate law enforcement agency, the department of child
safety and the other parent if the supervised parent's behavior endangers the
child or becomes psychologically abusive.

(
iv
) Appear for
future court proceedings and testify regarding the supervision.

(
d
) order the
parent who committed the act or acts of domestic violence to pay a fee for the
costs of supervised parenting time.

(
e
) Suspend access to the child, in any form, until the
parent who committed an act or acts of domestic violence can petition for a
modification of legal decision-making or parenting time pursuant to section
25-411.

(
f
) Order the
parent who committed the act or acts of domestic violence to attend and
complete a program of intervention for perpetrators of domestic violence and
any other counseling the court orders.

(
g
) If the
court finds that the parent who committed the act or acts of domestic violence
has also abused alcohol, other intoxicants or controlled substances, the court
may order that parent to abstain from possessing or consuming alcohol, other
intoxicants or controlled substances.

(
h
) Require a
bond for the child's safe return from the parent who committed the act or acts
of domestic violence.

(
i
) Order that
the address of the child and other parent remain confidential.

(
j
) Impose any
other condition that the court determines is necessary to protect the child,
the other parent and any other family or household member.

I. The court may not order a victim
of domestic violence, whether the child or a parent, to join the parent who
committed an act or acts of domestic violence in any inpatient or outpatient
treatment program, counseling program or forensic assessment, whether
telephonic, virtual or in person.

H.

J.
The
court may request or order the services of the department of child safety if
the court believes that a child may be the victim of child abuse or neglect as
defined in section 8-201.

I.

K.
In
determining whether the absence or relocation of a parent shall be weighed
against that parent in determining legal decision-making or parenting time, the
court may consider whether the absence or relocation was caused by an act of
domestic violence by the other parent.

L. For the purposes of this section:

1. "coercive control":

(
a
) Means a
pattern of threatening, humiliating or intimidating actionS that is used to
harm, punish or frighten a person.

(
b
) Includes
all of the following:

(
i
) A pattern
of behavior that takes away A person's liberty or freedom.

(
ii
) Stripping
A person's sense of self, bodily integrity and human rights.

(
iii
) Isolating
a person from friends and family.

(
iv
) Depriving
a person of independence.

(
v
) Regulating
a person's everyday behavior.

(
vi
) Monitoring,
surveilling, regulating or controlling a person's finances, economic resources
or access to services, or those of the person's child or relative.

(
vii
) Monitoring,
surveilling, regulating or controlling a person's activities, communications or
movements, including through the use of technology, or those of the person's
child or relative.

(
viii
) Name-calling,
degrading or demeaning a person or the person's child or relative on a frequent
basis.

(
ix
) Threatening
to harm or kill a person or the person's child or relative, including wearing,
accessing, displaying, using or cleaning a weapon in an intimidating or
threatening manner.

(
x
) Threatening
to commit suicide or self harm, when used as a method of coercion, control,
punishment, intimidation or retaliation against a person.

(
xi
) Threatening
to harm or kill an animal that a person or the person's child or relative has
an emotional bond with.

(
xii
) Threatening
to publish a person's sensitive personal information, including sexually
explicit material, or those of the person's child or relative.

(
xiii
) Threatening
to make reports to law enforcement authorities without reasonable cause.

(
xiv
) Damaging
a person's property or household goods, or those of the person's child or
relative.

(
xv
) Threatening
a person or the person's child or relative with deportation, contacting
authorities based on perceived or actual immigration status, withholding
essential documents required for immigration or threatening to withdraw or
interfere with an active immigration application or process.

(
xvi
) Forcing a
person or the person's child or relative to take part in criminal activities or
child abuse.

2. "Collateral act" means
conduct that, in time, location, sequence and causation, is substantially
distinct from the occurrences or acts at issue before the court.

3. "domestic violence":

(
a
) means, when
perpetrated by one parent against the other parent or against a minor child
living in either parent's household, either of the following:

(
i
) DOMESTIC
violence as defined in section 13-3601.

(
ii
) coercive
control.

(
b
) Does not
include defense of self or another if the defensive acts were proportionate to
the assault and the parent claiming self-defense did not provoke the
altercation.
END_STATUTE

Sec. 2. Section 25-404, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE
25-404.

Temporary orders

A. A party to a legal
decision-making and parenting time proceeding may move for a temporary
order. This motion must be supported by pleadings as provided in
section 25-411. The court may award temporary legal decision-making
and parenting time under the standards of section 25-403 after a hearing,
or, if there is no objection, solely on the basis of the pleadings.

B. If a proceeding for dissolution of marriage or
legal separation is dismissed, any temporary legal decision-making or parenting
time order is vacated unless a parent or the child's custodian moves that the
proceeding continue as a legal decision-making or parenting time proceeding and
the court finds, after a hearing, that the circumstances of the parents and the
best interest of the child require that a legal decision-making or parenting
time plan decree be issued.

C. If a legal decision-making or parenting time
proceeding commenced in the absence of a petition for dissolution of marriage
or legal separation is dismissed, any temporary
custody

legal decision-making or parenting time
order thereby is
vacated.

D. If a party to a proceeding for a
temporary order for legal decision-making or parenting time pursuant to this
section alleges that the other party committed an act or acts of domestic
violence as defined in section 25-403.03, the court shall make written
findings regarding the allegation of the act or acts of domestic violence
pursuant to the requirements of section 25-403.03.
END_STATUTE

Sec. 3. Section 25-411, Arizona Revised
Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE
25-411.

Modification of
legal decision-making or parenting time; affidavit; contents; military
families; acts of domestic violence

A. A person shall not make a motion to modify a
legal decision-making or parenting time decree earlier than one year
after its date, unless the court
permits

allows

it to be made on the basis of affidavits that there is reason to believe
the child's present environment may seriously endanger the child's physical,
mental, moral or emotional health. At any time after a joint legal
decision-making order is entered, a parent may petition the court for
modification of the order on the basis of evidence that domestic violence
involving a violation of section 13-1201 or 13-1204, spousal abuse
or child abuse occurred since the entry of the joint legal decision-making
order. Six months after a joint legal decision-making order is
entered, a parent may petition the court for modification of the order based on
the failure of the other parent to comply with the provisions of the
order. A motion or petition to modify an order shall meet the
requirements of this section.� Except as otherwise provided in this section, if
a parent is a member of the United States armed forces, the court shall
consider the terms of that parent's military family care plan to determine what
is in the child's best interest during that parent's military deployment.

B. If the parent with whom the parent's child
resides a majority of the time receives temporary duty, deployment, activation
or mobilization orders from the United States military that involve moving a
substantial distance away from the parent's residence
,
a
court shall not enter a final order modifying parental rights and
responsibilities and parent-child contact in an existing order until ninety
days after the deployment ends, unless a modification is agreed to by the
deploying parent.

C. The court shall not consider a parent's absence
caused by deployment or mobilization or the potential for future deployment or
mobilization as the sole factor supporting a real, substantial and
unanticipated change in circumstances pursuant to this section.

D. On motion of a deploying or nondeploying,
mobilizing or absent military parent, the court, after a hearing, shall enter a
temporary order modifying parental rights and responsibilities or parent-child
contact during the period of deployment or mobilization if:

1. A military parent who has legal decision-making
or parenting time pursuant to an existing court order has received notice from
military leadership that the military parent will deploy or mobilize in the
near future.

2. The deployment or mobilization would have a
material effect on the military parent's ability to exercise parental rights
and responsibilities or parent-child contact.

E. On motion of a deploying parent, if reasonable
advance notice is given and good cause is shown, the court shall allow that
parent to present testimony and evidence by electronic means with respect to
parenting time or parent-child contact matters instituted pursuant to this
section if the deployment of that parent has a material effect on that parent's
ability to appear in person at a regularly scheduled hearing.� For the purposes
of this subsection, "electronic means" includes communication by
telephone or video teleconference.

F. The court shall hear motions for modification
because of deployment as expeditiously as possible.

G. If a military parent receives military temporary
duty, deployment, activation or mobilization orders that involve moving a
substantial distance away from the military parent's residence or that
otherwise have a material effect on the military parent's ability to exercise
parenting time, at the request of the military parent, for the duration of the
military parent's absence the court may delegate the military parent's
parenting time, or a portion of that time, to a child's family member, including
a stepparent, or to another person who is not the child's parent but who has a
close and substantial relationship to the minor child, if the court determines
that is in the child's best interest.� The court shall not allow the delegation
of parenting time to a person who would be subject to limitations on parenting
time.� The parties shall attempt to resolve disputes regarding delegation of
parenting time through the dispute resolution process specified in their
parenting plan, unless excused by the court for good cause shown.� A court
order pursuant to this subsection does not establish separate rights to
parenting time for a person other than a parent.

H. All temporary modification orders pursuant to
this section shall include a specific transition schedule to facilitate a
return to the predeployment order within ten days after the deployment ends,
taking into consideration the child's best interests.

I. A decree or order that a court enters in
contemplation of or during the military deployment of a parent outside of the
continental United States shall specifically reference the deployment and
include provisions governing the legal decision-making or parenting time
arrangements, or both, of the minor child after the deployment ends.� Either
parent may file a petition with the court after the deployment ends to modify
the decree or order, in compliance with subsection
L

M
of this section.� The court shall hold a hearing or
conference on the petition within thirty days after the petition is filed.

J. The court may modify an order granting or denying
parenting time rights whenever modification would serve the best interest of
the child, but the court shall not restrict a parent's parenting time rights
unless it finds that the parenting time would endanger seriously the child's
physical, mental, moral or emotional health.

K. If after a legal decision-making or parenting
time order is in effect one of the parents is charged with a dangerous crime
against children as defined in section 13-705, child molestation as
defined in section 13-1410 or an act of domestic violence as prescribed
in section 13-3601 in which the victim is a minor, the other parent may
petition the court for an expedited hearing.� Pending the expedited hearing,
the court may suspend parenting time or change legal decision-making ex parte.

L. An allegation of an act or acts of
domestic violence as defined in section 25-403.03 shall be a primary factor in
the court's consideration of modification of a legal decision-making or
parenting time order.� The court shall allow a parent to present evidence of an
act or acts of domestic violence that occurred before the existing legal
decision-making or parenting time order.�

L.
M.
To
modify any type of legal decision-making or parenting time order a person shall
submit an affidavit or verified petition setting forth detailed facts
supporting the requested modification and shall give notice, together with a
copy of the affidavit or verified petition, to other parties to the proceeding,
who may file opposing affidavits.� The court shall deny the motion unless it
finds that adequate cause for hearing the motion is established by the
pleadings, in which case it shall set a date for hearing on why the requested
modification should not be granted.

M.

n.
The
court shall assess attorney fees and costs against a party seeking modification
if the court finds that the modification action is vexatious and constitutes
harassment.

N.
O.
Subsection

L

M
of this section does not
apply if the requested relief is for the modification or clarification of
parenting time and not for a change of legal decision-making.
END_STATUTE

Sec. 4.
Short title

This act may be cited as the
"Alec and Lydia Act".