Back to Arizona

SB1049 • 2026

spousal maintenance; income; property

SB1049 - spousal maintenance; income; property

Children Education Healthcare Housing
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Wendy Rogers
Last action
2026-06-11
Official status
House passed
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Checked against official source text during the last sync.

SB1049: Changes to Spousal Maintenance Rules

This bill changes the rules for when courts can order one spouse to pay money to another after a divorce, sets a four-year limit on payments, and defines what counts as basic needs.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires that a spouse seeking maintenance must lack sufficient property or other income sources to provide for their own reasonable needs before the court grants an order.
  • Limits spousal maintenance awards to a maximum period of four years.
  • Changes how courts calculate support by requiring them to consider one-half of the standard of living established during the marriage instead of the full amount.
  • Defines 'reasonable needs' as basic necessities like food, housing, utilities, health insurance, medical expenses, transportation, and educational costs needed for self-sufficiency or child care.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Spouses seeking financial support after a divorce or legal separation.
  • Courts that decide on spousal maintenance orders in Arizona.
  • The Arizona Supreme Court when it creates guidelines for calculating maintenance amounts.

Terms To Know

Spousal Maintenance
Money one spouse pays to the other after a divorce or legal separation to help with living costs.
Reasonable Needs
Basic necessities such as food, housing, and health insurance required for a person to become self-sufficient or care for a child.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not state the specific date it will take effect.
  • Courts may still award maintenance if they find in writing that following the standard guidelines would be inappropriate or unjust, but must explain why.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Plain English: This amendment requires courts to stop paying spousal support if the receiving spouse remarries or lives with someone in a marriage-like relationship, and it sets rules for getting back money paid after these events.

  • Courts must end spousal maintenance payments if the recipient gets married again or habitually cohabitates with another person in a relationship similar to marriage, unless they have a written agreement saying otherwise.
  • If support is stopped for these reasons, the court can order the receiving spouse to pay back any money that was paid after the remarriage or new living arrangement began.
  • The amendment lists specific types of evidence courts are allowed to look at when deciding if someone is cohabitating in a marriage-like relationship.
  • Either spouse can ask the court to end spousal maintenance payments at any time.
  • The provided text cuts off before finishing Section B, so details about specific calculation factors or health insurance costs are incomplete.
  • While a four-year limit on support is mentioned in the bill text, it is unclear if this amendment changes that rule or just adds new termination reasons.

Plain English: This amendment changes the rules for spousal maintenance in Arizona by adding a strict four-year time limit and requiring that any support be used only to help the receiving spouse become self-sufficient.

  • It sets a maximum limit of four years for how long a court can order one spouse to pay maintenance to another.
  • It requires courts to find that a spouse cannot meet their own needs using both their income and property before granting support.
  • It defines 'reasonable needs' as basic necessities like food, housing, and health insurance specifically needed to get education or training for self-sufficiency.
  • It adds new factors for judges to consider, such as damages from criminal convictions where one spouse was the victim.
  • The amendment text includes a blank space '[_________] ' next to the four-year limit, which suggests there may be an alternative time period or specific condition not fully detailed in this version.
  • Some technical legal terms regarding court jurisdiction and property apportionment are simplified for clarity but retain their original strict meaning.

Plain English: This amendment changes the rules for spousal maintenance in Arizona by requiring courts to consider a spouse's ability to earn money along with their property, setting a maximum time limit of four years for payments based on guidelines, and defining what counts as basic needs.

  • Courts must now check if a spouse can support themselves using both their job skills and any property they received before granting maintenance.
  • The law adds a strict rule that spousal maintenance cannot be awarded for more than four years when following the new guidelines.
  • A new definition is added to explain that 'reasonable needs' means basic necessities like food, housing, health insurance, and education costs needed to become self-sufficient or care for children.
  • The text includes a blank space next to the four-year limit which suggests there may be other time limits not specified in this version of the amendment.
  • Some technical legal terms regarding court jurisdiction and specific property calculations are kept as is, so their full impact on every case cannot be explained simply.

Bill History

  1. 2026-06-11 House

    House passed

  2. 2026-06-11 House

    House third read failed

  3. 2026-06-01 House

    House amended committee of the whole

  4. 2026-06-01 House

    House passed

  5. 2026-04-16 House

    House committee of the whole

  6. 2026-03-10 House

    House minority caucus

  7. 2026-03-10 House

    House majority caucus

  8. 2026-03-09 House

    House consent calendar

  9. 2026-02-26 House

    House second read

  10. 2026-02-25 House

    House Rules: C&P

  11. 2026-02-25 House

    House Judiciary: DP

  12. 2026-02-25 House

    House first read

  13. 2026-02-23 House

    Transmitted to House

  14. 2026-02-23 Senate

    Senate third read passed

  15. 2026-02-23 Senate

    Senate committee of the whole

  16. 2026-01-27 Senate

    Senate minority caucus

  17. 2026-01-27 Senate

    Senate majority caucus

  18. 2026-01-14 Senate

    Senate second read

  19. 2026-01-12 Senate

    Senate Rules: PFC

  20. 2026-01-12 Senate

    Senate Judiciary and Elections: DPA

  21. 2026-01-12 Senate

    Senate first read

Official Summary Text

SB1049 - 572R - Senate Fact Sheet

Assigned to
JUDE���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� AS
PASSED BY COMMITTEE

ARIZONA STATE SENATE

Fifty-Seventh
Legislature, Second Regular Session

AMENDED

FACT SHEET FOR
S.B. 1049

spousal
maintenance; income; property

Purpose

Modifies the conditions that allow the court to grant a spousal
maintenance order and the list of relevant factors on which the Arizona Supreme
Court (Supreme Court) must base the guidelines for determining and awarding
spousal maintenance.

Background

Either party in a marriage may initiate a proceeding for dissolution of
marriage, annulment or legal separation. The dissolution of marriage, annulment
or legal separation must allege that the marriage is irretrievably broken or
void, that one or both of the parties desire to live separate and apart or, if
the marriage is a covenant marriage, that statutorily outlined requirements
have been met (
A.R.S.
� 25-314
).

The court may grant a maintenance order to either spouse upon finding
that the spouse seeking maintenance: 1) lacks sufficient property, including
property apportioned to the spouse, to provide for that spouse's reasonable
needs; 2) lacks earning ability in the labor market that is adequate to be
self-sufficient; 3) is the parent of a child whose age or condition is such
that the parent should not be required to seek employment outside the home; 4)
has made a significant financial or other contribution to the education,
training, vocational skills, career or earning ability of the other spouse or
has significantly reduced the spouse's own income or career opportunities for
the benefit of the other spouse; or 5) had a marriage of long duration and is
of an age that may preclude the possibility of gaining employment adequate to
be self-sufficient.

The Arizona Supreme Court must establish guidelines for determining and
awarding spousal maintenance and base the guidelines and criteria for deviation
from the guidelines on prescribed relevant factors that are considered and
weighed in conjunction with each other, including, but not limited to, the: 1)
standard of living established during the marriage;

2) duration of the marriage; 3) age, employment history, earning ability and
physical and emotional condition of the spouse seeking maintenance; and 4) comparative
financial resources of the spouses, including the spouses' comparative earning
abilities in the labor market. The court may award spousal maintenance pursuant
to the guidelines only for a period of time and in an amount necessary to
enable the receiving spouse to become self-sufficient (
A.R.S.
� 25-319
).

There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund
associated with this legislation.

Provisions

1.

Adds, to each of the conditions which allow the court to grant a spousal
maintenance order, the stipulation that the spouse seeking maintenance must
lack sufficient property apportioned to that spouse or other income sources to
provide for that spouse's own reasonable needs or the needs of a child as
prescribed.

2.

Modifies the list of relevant factors on which the Supreme Court must
base the guidelines for determining and awarding spousal maintenance to require
that one-half of the standard of living established during the marriage be
considered, rather than the whole standard of living.

3.

Prohibits the court from awarding spousal maintenance for a period exceeding
four years.

4.

Defines

reasonable needs
as basic necessities to enable a receiving spouse to
acquire education or training to become self-sufficient or that are necessary
for the care of a child, including:

a)

food;

b)

housing;

c)

utilities;

d)

health insurance;

e)

medical expenses;

f)

transportation; and

g)

educational
expenses.

5.

Makes technical and conforming changes.

6.

Becomes effective on the general effective date.

Amendments Adopted by
Committee

�

Prohibits the court from awarding spousal maintenance for a
period exceeding four years, rather than an unspecified number of years.

Senate Action

JUDE���� 1/21/26����� DPA������ 4-2-1

Prepared by Senate Research

January 22, 2026

ZD/KS/ci

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
SB1049 - 572R - H Ver

House Engrossed
Senate Bill

spousal maintenance;
income; property

State of Arizona

Senate

Fifty-seventh Legislature

Second Regular Session

2026

SENATE BILL 1049

AN
ACT

amending section 25-319, arizona
revised statutes; relating to spousal maintenance.

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

Be it
enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Section 25-319, Arizona Revised
Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE
25-319.

Spousal maintenance; supreme court guidelines; computation
factors; court jurisdiction; termination of spousal maintenance; factors;
definition

A. In a proceeding for dissolution of marriage or
legal separation, or a proceeding for maintenance following dissolution of the
marriage by a court that lacked personal jurisdiction over the absent spouse,
the court may grant a maintenance order for either spouse for any of the
following reasons if
it

the court
finds
that the spouse seeking maintenance:

1.
Lacks sufficient property,
including property apportioned to the spouse, to

Is
unable to
provide for that spouse's
own
reasonable
needs
through a combination of earning ability and property
apportioned to the spouse seeking maintenance
.

2. Lacks earning ability in the labor
market that is adequate to be self-sufficient.

3.

2.
Is
the parent of a child whose age or condition is such that the parent should not
be required to seek employment outside the home
and does not
have sufficient property apportioned to that parent or other income sources to
provide for the child's reasonable needs
.

4.

3.
Has
made a significant financial or other contribution to the education, training,
vocational skills, career or earning ability of the other spouse or has
significantly reduced that spouse's income or career opportunities for the
benefit of the other spouse
and does not have sufficient
property apportioned to the spouse seeking maintenance or other income sources
provided for that spouse's own reasonable needs
.

5.

4.
Had
a marriage of long duration and is of an age that may preclude the possibility
of gaining employment adequate to be self-sufficient
and
does not have sufficient property apportioned to the spouse seeking maintenance
or other income sources to provide for that spouse's own reasonable needs
.

B. The supreme court shall establish guidelines for
determining and awarding spousal maintenance. The court may award
spousal maintenance pursuant to the guidelines only for a period of time and in
an amount necessary to enable the receiving spouse to become self-sufficient.
�
The court may not award spousal maintenance for a period of
more than four years. �
The amount of spousal maintenance resulting from
the application of the guidelines shall be the amount of spousal maintenance
ordered by the court, unless the court finds in writing that applying the
guidelines would be inappropriate or unjust. The supreme court shall
base the guidelines and criteria for deviation from the guidelines on the
following relevant factors
listed in paragraphs 1 through 13 of
this subsection and

as
considered together and
weighed in conjunction with each other:

1.
one-half of
the
standard of living established during the marriage.

2. The duration of the marriage.

3. The age, employment history, earning ability and
physical and emotional condition of the spouse seeking maintenance.

4. The ability of the spouse from whom maintenance
is sought to meet that spouse's needs while meeting those of the spouse seeking
maintenance.

5. The comparative financial resources of the
spouses, including their comparative earning abilities in the labor market.

6. The contribution of the spouse seeking
maintenance to the earning ability of the other spouse.

7. The extent to which the spouse seeking
maintenance has
reduced that spouse's income or career
opportunities for the benefit of the other spouse.

8. The ability of both parties after the dissolution
to contribute to the future educational costs of their mutual children.

9. The financial resources of the
party

spouse
seeking maintenance, including marital property
apportioned to that spouse, and that spouse's ability to meet that spouse's own
needs independently.

10. The time necessary to acquire sufficient
education or training to enable the
party

spouse

seeking maintenance to find appropriate employment and whether such
education or training is readily available.

11. Excessive or abnormal expenditures, destruction,
concealment or fraudulent disposition of community, joint tenancy and other
property held in common.

12. The cost for the spouse who is seeking
maintenance to obtain health insurance and the reduction in the cost of health
insurance for the spouse from whom maintenance is sought if the spouse from
whom maintenance is sought is able to convert family health insurance to
employee health insurance after the marriage is dissolved.

13. All actual damages and judgments from conduct
that resulted in criminal conviction of either spouse in which the other spouse
or a child was the victim.

C. A maintenance order shall be made without regard
to marital misconduct.

D. If both parties agree, the maintenance order and
a decree of dissolution of marriage or of legal separation may state that its
maintenance terms shall not be modified.

E. Unless there is a written
agreement between the parties that provides otherwise, the court shall
terminate spousal maintenance if any of the followING occurS:

1. The spouse who is receiving
spousal maintenance remarries.

2. The
court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the spouse who is receiving
spousal maintenance has habitually cohabitated for one year or more with
another individual in a relationship that is analogous to a marriage.

3. The court finds by a preponderance
of the evidence that the spouse who is receiving spousal maintenance had
habitually cohabitated with another individual in a relationship analogous to a
marriage and failed to disclose the cohabitation during the dissolution of
marriage or legal separation proceeding that resulted in an award of spousal
maintenance.

F. If the court terminates an award
of spousal maintenance pursuant to subsection E of this section, the spouse who
is paying the spousal maintenance is entitled to reimbursement for any spousal
maintenance that was paid beginning on the date that the spouse who is
receiving spousal maintenance remarried or began habitually cohabitating with
another individual in a relationship analogous to a marriage. �The court shall
enter an award of partial or full reimbursement to the spouse who is paying
spousal maintenance.

G. The court may consider all of the
following factors when determining whether the spouse who is receiving spousal
maintenance has habitually cohabitated with another individual in a
relationship that is analogous to a marriage:

1. An oral or written statement or
representation that is made to a third party regarding the cohabitating
relationship.

2. The economic dependence of the
couple who are cohabitating or the economic dependence of one person on the
other.

3. The conduct or collaborative roles
of the couple who are cohabitating in furtherance of the couple's life together.

4. The benefit of the relationship on
the life of one oR both of THE people who are cohabitating.

5. The community reputation of the
couple who are cohabitating.

6. Any other factor that the court
finds relevant and material.

H. A spouse may petition for
termination of an award of spousal maintenance pursuant to this section at any
time. �This section applies to all proceedings relating to spousal maintenance,
regardless of any of the following:

1. the date of the filing of a
petition for dissolution of marriage or legal separation that resulted in an
award of spousal maintenance.

2. the date of entry of an award of
spousal maintenance.

3. The date of the filing of a
petition for modification of spousal maintenance.

E.

I.
Except as provided in subsection D of this
section or section 25-317, subsection G, the court shall maintain
continuing jurisdiction over the issue of maintenance for the period of time
maintenance is awarded.

J. For
the purposes of this section, "reasonable needs":

1. Means basic necessities that are
necessary to enable a receiving spouse to acquire education or training to
become self-sufficient or that are necessary for the care of a child.

2. Includes food, housing, utilities,
health insurance, medical expenses, transportation and educational expenses.
END_STATUTE