Back to Arizona

SB1081 • 2026

DCS cases; attorney appearances

SB1081 - DCS cases; attorney appearances

Children
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Mark Finchem
Last action
2026-03-09
Official status
House second read
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source does not provide details about what happens if an attorney accidentally appears before the same judge, or how it will affect case management and court scheduling.

DCS Cases; Attorney Appearances

This bill prohibits DCS attorneys from appearing before a judge if they have appeared before that same judge in any of the department's previous five cases involving dependency, adoption, termination of parental rights or guardianship.

What This Bill Does

  • Adds a new law requiring DCS attorneys to avoid appearing before judges who heard their arguments in past cases within the last five cases handled by DCS.
  • Applies this rule specifically to dependency, adoption, termination of parental rights or guardianship cases involving DCS.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Attorneys representing the Department of Child Safety (DCS) in specific types of cases
  • Judges hearing dependency, adoption, termination of parental rights or guardianship cases involving DCS

Terms To Know

Department of Child Safety (DCS)
A government agency responsible for protecting children from abuse and neglect.
Dependency
When a child is unable to live with their parents due to safety concerns or other issues.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify what happens if an attorney accidentally appears before the same judge.
  • It's unclear how this law will affect case management and court scheduling.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-09 House

    House second read

  2. 2026-03-05 House

    House Rules: None

  3. 2026-03-05 House

    House Health & Human Services: None

  4. 2026-03-05 House

    House first read

  5. 2026-03-03 House

    Transmitted to House

  6. 2026-03-03 Senate

    Senate third read passed

  7. 2026-02-24 Senate

    Senate committee of the whole

  8. 2026-01-27 Senate

    Senate minority caucus

  9. 2026-01-27 Senate

    Senate majority caucus

  10. 2026-01-26 Senate

    Senate consent calendar

  11. 2026-01-14 Senate

    Senate second read

  12. 2026-01-12 Senate

    Senate Rules: PFC

  13. 2026-01-12 Senate

    Senate Judiciary and Elections: DP

  14. 2026-01-12 Senate

    Senate first read

Official Summary Text

SB1081 - 572R - Senate Fact Sheet

Assigned to
JUDE������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ FOR
COMMITTEE

ARIZONA STATE SENATE

Fifty-Seventh
Legislature, Second Regular Session

FACT SHEET FOR
S.B. 1081

DCS cases;
attorney appearances

Purpose

Prohibits an
attorney representing the Department of Child Safety (DCS) in specified cases
from appearing before a judge whom the attorney has already appeared before in any
of DCS' previous five cases.

Background

The juvenile
court has jurisdiction over proceedings in an action in which parental rights
are terminated. In a juvenile court proceeding an attorney may substitute as
attorney of record in a pending action only by court order, except as
prescribed for case transfers within the same law firm or governmental office. The
attorney must file a motion that contains the client's written consent and a
proposed order, and the substituting attorney must promptly provide the signed
order to the other parties' attorneys.

If a pending case is transferred within
the same law firm or governmental office, the court must be notified of the new
attorney of record, including any changes in the physical or email address. An
order of substitution is not required for case transfers within the same law
firm or governmental office. If a transfer is made for purpose of appeal, the
notice must be filed with the appellate court in which the case is pending (
A.R.S.
� 8-202
;
Ariz.
Juv. Ct. Rules of Proc., Rule 304
).

A party to a
juvenile court proceeding is entitled to a change of judge for cause on the
grounds that the: 1) judge has been engaged as counsel in the action prior to
appointment or election as a judge; 2) judge is otherwise interested in the
action; 3) judge is of kin or related to either party to the action; 4) judge
is a material witness in the action; or 5) party filing the affidavit has cause
to believe and does believe that on account of the bias, prejudice, or interest
of the judge, the party cannot obtain a fair and impartial trial. A party
waives the right to a change of judge for cause when the party allows a
contested proceeding to begin or continue before that judge without objection
and after learning that grounds exist for a challenge for cause.

A party to a
juvenile court proceeding may also make one request for a change of judge
without cause by making the request on the record in open court or by filing a
notice of change of judge that is signed by the party's attorney or the party,
if self-represented, and that states the name of the judge to be changed. The
notice of change of judge must be filed within five days after notice is
provided to the requesting party of the assignment of the case to a judge. A
party waives the right to a change of judge without cause when the party
participates before that judge in any contested proceeding (
A.R.S.
� 8-865
;
Ariz.
Juv. Ct. Rules of Proc., Rule 108
).

There is no
anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this
legislation.

Provisions

1.

Prohibits an attorney who represents DCS in a dependency, adoption,
termination of parental rights or guardianship case from appearing before a
judge whom the attorney has already appeared before in any of DCS' previous
five cases.

2.

Contains a statement of legislative intent.

3.

Becomes effective on the general effective date.

Prepared by Senate Research

January 16, 2026

ZD/KS/ci

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
SB1081 - 572R - S Ver

Senate Engrossed

DCS cases; attorney
appearances

State of Arizona

Senate

Fifty-seventh Legislature

Second Regular Session

2026

SENATE BILL 1081

AN
ACT

amending title 8, chapter 4, article 1,
Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 8-469.03; relating to the
department of child safety.

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Title 8, chapter 4, article 1,
Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 8-469.03, to read:

START_STATUTE
8-469.03.

Department cases; attorney appearances

Notwithstanding any other law, in a department
case involving dependency, adoption, termination of parental rights or
guardianship, an individual attorney who represents the department may not
appear before a judge if the individual attorney has appeared before that same
judge within the department's previous five cases.
END_STATUTE

Sec. 2.
Legislative intent and findings

A. The legislature intends
to promote the interests of biological families and avoid removal and placement
of minors in foster care when possible, even to the extent of kinship
promotion.� Removal of a minor must be the last viable option.

B. The legislature finds
that the potential for bias is inherently countered and undue influence through
familiarity is minimized by ensuring the rotation of attorneys who appear in
front of various judges and courtrooms.