Back to Arizona

SB1112 • 2026

mental health; hearings; acquaintance witnesses

SB1112 - mental health; hearings; acquaintance witnesses

Budget
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Carine Werner, Hildy Angius, Thomas "T.J." Shope, Matt Gress
Last action
2026-03-09
Official status
House second read
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill summary does not provide specific details on fiscal impact, so this remains an unknown.

Mental Health Hearings; Acquaintance Witnesses

This bill allows courts to waive the need for an acquaintance witness during mental health treatment hearings if there is clear and convincing evidence from other sources.

What This Bill Does

  • Allows a court to skip having an acquaintance of the patient testify during a hearing if there's already clear and convincing evidence from other sources.
  • Reduces the number of required acquaintance witnesses from two or more to at least one.

Who It Names or Affects

  • People who are part of court-ordered mental health treatment hearings.
  • Courts that handle these types of cases.

Terms To Know

Acquaintance witness
A person who knows the patient and can provide information about their behavior or condition.
Clear and convincing evidence
Evidence that is highly probable to be true, showing something with a high degree of certainty.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill does not specify the exact fiscal impact on state funds.
  • It only applies to court-ordered mental health treatment hearings in Arizona.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Plain English: Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO S.B.

  • Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
  • 1112 (Reference to Senate engrossed bill) Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert: 1 "Section 1.
  • Appropriation; fiscal year 2026-2027; state 2 department of corrections; holistic studio-based 3 rehabilitative programming and interventions; 4 report 5 A.
  • The sum of $1,000,000 is appropriated from the special services 6 fund established by section 41-1604.03, Arizona Revised Statutes, in 7 fiscal year 2026-2027 to the state department of corrections to establish 8 and implement holistic studio-based rehabilitative programming and 9 interventions.
  • This amendment summary is using official source text because generated interpretation was skipped for this run.

Plain English: Fifty-seventh Legislature Appropriations Second Regular Session S.B.

  • Fifty-seventh Legislature Appropriations Second Regular Session S.B.
  • 1112 PROPOSED HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
  • 1112 (Reference to Senate engrossed bill) Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert: 1 "Section 1.
  • Appropriation; fiscal year 2026-2027; state 2 department of corrections; holistic studio-based 3 rehabilitative programming and interventions; 4 report 5 A.
  • This amendment summary is using official source text because generated interpretation was skipped for this run.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-09 House

    House second read

  2. 2026-03-05 House

    House Rules: None

  3. 2026-03-05 House

    House Appropriations: DPA/SE

  4. 2026-03-05 House

    House Health & Human Services: W/D

  5. 2026-03-05 House

    House first read

  6. 2026-03-02 House

    Transmitted to House

  7. 2026-03-02 Senate

    Senate third read passed

  8. 2026-02-23 Senate

    Senate passed

  9. 2026-02-19 Senate

    Senate third read failed

  10. 2026-01-27 Senate

    Senate minority caucus

  11. 2026-01-27 Senate

    Senate majority caucus

  12. 2026-01-26 Senate

    Senate consent calendar

  13. 2026-01-20 Senate

    Senate second read

  14. 2026-01-15 Senate

    Senate Rules: PFC

  15. 2026-01-15 Senate

    Senate Health and Human Services: DP

  16. 2026-01-15 Senate

    Senate first read

Official Summary Text

SB1112 - 572R - Senate Fact Sheet

Assigned to
HHS�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� FOR
COMMITTEE

ARIZONA STATE SENATE

Fifty-Seventh
Legislature, Second Regular Session

FACT SHEET FOR
S.B. 1112

mental health; hearings;
acquaintance witnesses

Purpose

Allows the
Court, during court-ordered treatment proceedings, to waive the required
testimony of an acquaintance witness of the patient if the court finds that the
standard for issuing an order for treatment has been established by clear and
convincing evidence from other testimony and evidence presented at the hearing.

Background

Statute outlines
processes by which individuals may, voluntarily or under court order, be
evaluated, admitted and treated by designated mental health providers,
including approved evaluation agencies and mental health treatment agencies.
Court-ordered evaluation is a process by which two behavioral health medical
professionals complete a detailed analysis of an individual to assess whether
the individual is: 1) a danger to themselves; 2) a danger to others; 3)
persistently or acutely disabled; or 4) gravely disabled. Court-ordered
evaluations must determine the severity of an individual's specific mental or
behavioral health concern and the individual's capacity to adequately function
and care for themselves. If it is determined that an individual meets one of
the four outlined criteria, the evaluators must submit their findings to the
superior court in the county where the individual resides so that a judge may
determine whether the individual meets the necessary criteria to be ordered
into treatment by a mental health treatment agency (
A.R.S. Title 36, Chapter 5
;
AHCCCS
).
�

During a
hearing for court ordered treatment, the evidence presented by the petitioner
or the patient must include the testimony of two or more witnesses regardless
of the witnesses' professional licensure, who observed or were acquainted with
the patient at the time of the alleged mental disorder, and the testimony of
the two physicians, or other health professionals, who participated in the COE
of the patient. The evaluating physicians or other health professionals must
testify to the physician or health professional's personal observations of the
patient and to the physician or health professional's opinions concerning
whether the patient, as a result of mental disorder: 1) is a danger to self or
to others; 2) has a persistent, acute or grave disability; and

3) requires treatment (
A.R.S.
� 36-539
).

There is no
anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this
legislation.

Provisions

1.

Authorizes the Court, during court-ordered treatment proceedings, to
waive the required testimony of an acquaintance witness of the patient if the
Court finds that the standard for issuing an order for treatment has been
established by clear and convincing evidence from other testimony and evidence
presented at the hearing.

2.

Reduces, from two to one, the minimum number of acquaintance witnesses
required to provide testimony in a court-ordered treatment hearing.

3.

Makes technical changes.

4.

Becomes effective on the general effective date.

Prepared by Senate Research

January 15, 2026

MM/hk

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
SB1112 - 572R - S Ver

Senate Engrossed

mental health;
hearings; acquaintance witnesses

State of Arizona

Senate

Fifty-seventh Legislature

Second Regular Session

2026

SENATE BILL 1112

AN
ACT

Amending section 36-539, Arizona
Revised Statutes; relating to mental health services.

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Section 36-539, Arizona Revised
Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE
36-539.

Conduct of hearing; record; transcript

A. The medical director of the evaluation agency
shall issue instructions to the physicians or the psychiatric and mental health
nurse practitioner of the evaluation agency who is treating the proposed
patient to take all reasonable precautions to ensure that at the time of the
hearing the proposed patient is not so under the influence of or does not so
suffer the effects of drugs, medication or other treatment as to be hampered in
preparing for or participating in the hearing. If the proposed
patient is being treated as an inpatient by the evaluation agency, the court at
the time of the hearing shall be presented a record of all drugs, medication or
other treatment that the person has received during the seventy-two hours
immediately before the hearing.

B. The patient and the patient's attorney shall be
present at all hearings, and the patient's attorney may subpoena and cross-examine
witnesses and present evidence. The patient may choose to not attend
the hearing or the patient's attorney may waive the patient's
presence. The evidence presented by the petitioner or the patient
shall include the testimony of
two or more witnesses
at least one witness
, regardless of the witnesses'
professional licensure, if any, who observed or
were
was
acquainted with the patient at the time of the alleged
mental disorder before the submission of the current application for evaluation
pursuant to section 36-520 or, if after the submission of the current
application, who
were
was
not
a
formal
participants

participant
in the evaluation process. The
witness

testimony
of the witnesses
shall be limited to
observed facts and may not include expert opinion or
conclusions. The witness testimony may be satisfied by a statement
agreed on by the parties and testimony of the two physicians or other health
professionals who participated in the evaluation of the patient pursuant to
section 36-533, which may be satisfied by stipulating to the admission of
the affidavits as required pursuant to section 36-533, subsection
B. The evaluating physicians or other health professionals shall
testify as to their personal observations of the patient. They shall
also testify as to their opinions concerning whether the patient is, as a
result of mental disorder, a danger to self or to others or has a persistent or
acute disability or a grave disability and as to whether the patient requires
treatment. Such testimony shall state specifically the nature and
extent of the danger to self or to others, the persistent or acute disability
or the grave disability. If the patient has a grave disability, the
evaluating physicians or other health professionals shall testify concerning
the need for guardianship or conservatorship, or both, and whether or not the
need is for immediate appointment.
� The court may waive the
requirement for the testimony of a witness acquainted with the patient if the
court finds that the standard for issuance of a court order for treatment has
been established by clear and convincing evidence from other testimony and
evidence presented at the hearing.
Other persons who have
participated in the evaluation of the patient or, if further treatment was
requested by a mental health treatment agency, persons of that agency who are
directly involved in the care of the patient shall testify at the request of
the court or of the patient's attorney.� Witnesses shall testify as to
placement alternatives appropriate and available for the care and treatment of
the patient. The clinical record of the patient for the current
admission shall be available and may be presented in full or in part as
evidence at the request of the court, the county attorney or the patient's
attorney.

C. If the patient, for medical or psychiatric
reasons, is unable to be present at the hearing and cannot appear by other
reasonably feasible means, the court shall require clear and convincing
evidence that the patient is unable to be present at the hearing and on such a
finding may proceed with the hearing in the patient's absence.

D. The requirements of subsection B of this section
are in addition to all rules of evidence and the Arizona rules of civil
procedure, not inconsistent with subsection B of this section.

E. A verbatim record of all proceedings under this
section shall be made by stenographic means by a court reporter if a written
request for a court reporter is made by any party to the proceedings at least
twenty-four hours in advance of such proceedings. If
stenographic means are not requested in the manner provided by this subsection,
electronic means shall be directed by the presiding judge. The
stenographic notes or electronic tape shall be retained as provided by statute.

F. A patient who has been ordered to undergo
treatment may request a certified transcript of the hearing. To
obtain a copy, the patient shall pay for a transcript or shall file an
affidavit that the patient is without means to pay for a
transcript. If the affidavit is found true by the court, the expense
of the transcript is a charge on the county in which the proceedings were held,
or, if an intergovernmental agreement by the counties has required evaluation
in a county other than that of the patient's residence, such expense may be
charged to the county of the patient's residence or in which the patient was
found before evaluation.
END_STATUTE