Back to Arizona

SB1186 • 2026

document retention; proposals; donations

SB1186 - document retention; proposals; donations

Elections Labor
Vetoed

The latest official action shows the governor vetoed this bill. Check the bill history to see whether lawmakers later overrode that veto.

Sponsor
Thomas "T.J." Shope, Frank Carroll, David C. Farnsworth, John Kavanagh, Warren Petersen
Last action
2026-06-19
Official status
Governor vetoed
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

Checked against official source text during the last sync.

SB1186: Rules on Document Keeping and Donation Disclosure

This bill requires companies seeking state contracts or grants to report donations made to the governor, related entities, or election supporters in the last five years and sets rules for keeping procurement evaluation notes.

What This Bill Does

  • Requires companies with current state contracts or those applying for new ones to disclose any value given by themselves, their officers, directors, or family members to the governor, governor-controlled groups, or entities supporting the governor's election within the past five years.
  • Mandates that companies applying for grants must report donations made by themselves, their leaders, or family members to the same categories of recipients over the last five years.
  • Prohibits state agencies and employees from destroying notes taken while evaluating proposals submitted by companies.
  • Allows contracts related to destroyed evaluation notes to be resolicited if those records are lost after this law takes effect.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Companies that currently hold state contracts or respond to requests for new contracts
  • Businesses applying for state grants
  • State agencies responsible for managing procurement and keeping records

Terms To Know

Request for proposals
A formal process where the government asks companies to submit plans or bids to do work.
Resolicitation of contracts
The act of asking for new bids on a contract that was already awarded, which may happen if required evaluation notes are destroyed.

Limits and Unknowns

  • This bill was vetoed by the governor and did not become law unless lawmakers later overrode that decision.
  • The text does not specify penalties for failing to disclose donations, only that disclosure is required.

Amendments

These notes stay tied to the official amendment files and metadata from the legislature.

Plain English: This amendment requires companies to reveal any gifts or donations given to the governor and related political groups in the last five years if they want state contracts or grants, while also protecting evaluation notes from being destroyed.

  • Companies must disclose any value provided by themselves, their leaders, or family members to the governor or his campaign entities within the past five years when responding to a request for proposals.
  • The same disclosure rule applies to companies applying for state grants regarding donations made to the governor and related political organizations.
  • State agencies are prohibited from destroying notes taken during the evaluation of company proposals, with contracts potentially being reopened if these notes are destroyed.
  • The amendment text removes a requirement that companies currently holding state contracts must disclose donations; it now only applies to those responding to new requests for proposals.
  • The specific definition of 'anything of value' is not detailed in this text and relies on existing legal interpretations.

Plain English: This amendment requires companies to report any gifts or donations given to the governor and related political groups if they want state contracts, grants, or respond to proposal requests.

  • Companies must disclose any value provided by themselves, their leaders, or family members to the governor in the last five years when responding to a request for proposals.
  • The same disclosure rule applies to companies applying for state grants regarding donations made to the governor and related political entities.
  • State agencies are forbidden from destroying notes taken while evaluating company proposals, with penalties including resoliciting contracts if notes are destroyed.
  • The text does not define exactly what counts as 'anything of value' or specify the format for these disclosures.
  • It is unclear how state agencies will enforce the rule against destroying evaluation notes beyond resoliciting contracts.

Plain English: This amendment requires the state to track and publish names of business owners on government contracts while banning those same people from giving political donations during a specific bidding period.

  • The Director of Administration must collect and list the names of every principal (owner) for any company that wins or renews a state contract.
  • A public online portal will allow anyone to search these contracts by entering either the contractor's name or the name of its principals.
  • Contractors, bidders, and their owners are prohibited from giving gifts or donations over $50 to political candidates or committees while waiting for a bid decision and for 90 days after winning.
  • People who break these donation rules face civil fines starting at $500 and may be banned from getting future state contracts.
  • The full text of the amendment regarding specific definitions and enforcement details was cut off in the provided material, so some technical terms are not fully explained.
  • The exact dollar amount threshold for which contracts must be listed is determined by future regulations rather than a fixed number in this text.

Bill History

  1. 2026-06-10 V

    Governor vetoed

  2. 2026-06-09 Senate

    Transmitted to Senate

  3. 2026-06-09 House

    House third read passed

  4. 2026-06-01 House

    House committee of the whole

  5. 2026-03-31 House

    House minority caucus

  6. 2026-03-31 House

    House majority caucus

  7. 2026-03-30 House

    House consent calendar

  8. 2026-03-16 House

    House second read

  9. 2026-03-11 House

    House Rules: C&P

  10. 2026-03-11 House

    House Government: DP

  11. 2026-03-11 House

    House first read

  12. 2026-03-02 House

    Transmitted to House

  13. 2026-03-02 Senate

    Senate third read passed

  14. 2026-03-02 Senate

    Senate committee of the whole

  15. 2026-02-23 Senate

    Senate minority caucus

  16. 2026-02-23 Senate

    Senate majority caucus

  17. 2026-01-21 Senate

    Senate second read

  18. 2026-01-20 Senate

    Senate Rules: PFC

  19. 2026-01-20 Senate

    Senate Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency: DPA

  20. 2026-01-20 Senate

    Senate first read

Official Summary Text

SB1186 - document retention; proposals; donations

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
SB1186 - 572R - S Ver

Senate Engrossed

document retention;
proposals; donations

State of Arizona

Senate

Fifty-seventh Legislature

Second Regular Session

2026

SENATE BILL 1186

AN
ACT

AMENDING TITLE 41, CHAPTER 23, ARTICLE 1,
ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 41-2505; AMENDING SECTION 41-2550,
ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; AMENDING TITLE 41, CHAPTER 24, ARTICLE 1, ARIZONA
REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 41-2707; RELATING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
ADMINISTRATION.

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

Be it
enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section
1.
1. Title 41, chapter 23, article 1, Arizona
Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 41-2505, to read:

START_STATUTE
41-2505.

State contracts; request for proposals; governor; donations;
disclosure

Notwithstanding any
other law, a company
that currently has a state
contract with any state agency or that responds to a request for proposals
shall disclose anything of value that the company, its officers or directors or
any of their family members have PROVIDED, DIRECTLY or indirectly, during the
preceding five years to any of the following:

1. The governor.

2. any entity that is established,
financed, maintained or controlled by the Governor or an agent of the Governor,
including a campaign committee, a joint fundraising committee or an inaugural
fund.

3. an entity that advocates for the
election of the Governor or for the defeat of an electoral opponent of the
Governor, including a political committee or other nonprofit organization that
makes any independent expenditures.

END_STATUTE

Sec.
2.
2. Section
41-2550, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE
41-2550.

Retention of procurement records; resolicitation of contracts

A.
All procurement records
shall be retained and disposed of in accordance with records retention
guidelines and schedules approved by the Arizona state library, archives and
public records.

B. A state
agency or state employee may not destroy any notes taken during the evaluation
of a company that responds to a request for proposals. If a state
agency or state employee destroys any notes pursuant to this subsection, All
contracts that were related to the destroyed notes and that were agreed to FROM
AND AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AMENDMENT TO THIS SECTION MAY be
resolicited.

END_STATUTE

Sec.
3.
3. Title
41, chapter 24, article 1, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding
section 41-2707, to read:

START_STATUTE
41-2707.

Grants; governor; donations; disclosure

Notwithstanding any other law, a company that
applies for a grant shall disclose anything of value that the company, its
officers or directors or any of their family members have PROVIDED, DIRECTLY or
indirectly, during the preceding five years to any of the following:

1. The governor.

2. any entity that is established,
financed, maintained or controlled by the Governor or an agent of the Governor,
including a campaign committee, a joint fundraising committee or an inaugural
fund.

3. an entity that advocates for the
election of the Governor or for the defeat of an electoral opponent of the
Governor, including a political committee or other nonprofit organization that
makes any independent expenditures.

END_STATUTE