Back to Arizona

SB1661 • 2026

paternity; genetic testing; support obligation

SB1661 - paternity; genetic testing; support obligation

Children
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Catherine Miranda, Lela Alston, Rosanna Gabaldón
Last action
2026-03-03
Official status
Senate committee of the whole
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source material does not provide specific details on the timing of when a support obligation can be terminated after genetic testing results are available.

Paternity; Genetic Testing; Support Obligation

This bill allows the court to terminate a child support obligation if subsequent genetic testing proves that a presumed father is not the biological father of the child.

What This Bill Does

  • Allows courts to terminate child support obligations when genetic tests show a man is not the biological father.
  • Negates the presumption of paternity and financial responsibility if genetic testing confirms he is not the biological father.

Who It Names or Affects

  • People who are presumed fathers but may not be the biological fathers of a child.
  • Courts that handle cases involving child support and paternity.

Terms To Know

Genetic Testing
A process to determine if someone is biologically related to another person, often used to confirm parentage.
Paternity Presumption
The legal assumption that a man is the father of a child based on certain conditions like marriage or signing documents.

Limits and Unknowns

  • Does not specify how long after genetic testing results are available before a support obligation can be terminated.
  • Does not address what happens to any existing arrearages (past due payments) if paternity is disproven.
  • The bill's effectiveness date has not been set.

Bill History

  1. 2026-03-03 Senate

    Senate committee of the whole

  2. 2026-02-25 Senate

    Senate minority caucus

  3. 2026-02-25 Senate

    Senate majority caucus

  4. 2026-02-10 Senate

    Senate second read

  5. 2026-02-09 Senate

    Senate Rules: PFC

  6. 2026-02-09 Senate

    Senate Judiciary and Elections: DP

  7. 2026-02-09 Senate

    Senate first read

Official Summary Text

SB1661 - 572R - Senate Fact Sheet

Assigned to
JUDE������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ FOR
COMMITTEE

ARIZONA STATE SENATE

Fifty-Seventh
Legislature, Second Regular Session

FACT SHEET FOR
S.B. 1661

paternity; genetic
testing; support obligation

Purpose

Allows the court
to terminate a child support obligation if subsequent genetic testing affirms
that a presumed father is not the biological father of the child.

Background

In any
proceeding involving child support, the court may order one or both parents to
pay an amount necessary for the support of a child. A child support obligation
vests as each installment becomes due and is enforceable as final judgment by
operation of law. Child support orders may be modified or terminated only on a
showing of changed circumstances that are substantial and continuing (
A.R.S.
� 25-503
).

A man is
presumed to be the father of a child if he was married to the child's mother
within 10 months preceding the birth, if genetic testing affirms at least a 95
percent probability of paternity, if both parents sign the birth certificate of
a child born out of wedlock, or if both parents sign a notarized or witnessed
acknowledgment of paternity. A presumption of paternity may be rebutted only by
clear and convincing evidence, and if multiple presumptions apply, the court
determines which presumption controls based on weightier considerations of
policy and logic (
A.R.S.
� 25-814
).

There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund
associated with this legislation.

Provisions

1.

Allows the court to terminate a child support obligation if subsequent
genetic testing affirms that a presumed father is not the biological father of
the child.

2.

Negates a paternity presumption and responsibility for financial support
obligations if genetic testing affirms that a presumed father is not the
biological father of the child.

3.

Makes technical changes.

4.

Becomes effective on the general effective date.

Prepared by Senate Research

February 13, 2026

ZD/MY/ci

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
SB1661 - 572R - S Ver

Senate Engrossed

paternity; genetic
testing; support obligation

State of Arizona

Senate

Fifty-seventh Legislature

Second Regular Session

2026

SENATE BILL 1661

AN
ACT

amending sections 25-503 and 25-814,
arizona revised statutes; RELATING to paternity.

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

Be it
enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Section 25-503, Arizona Revised
Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE
25-503.

Order for support; methods of payment; modification; termination;
statute of limitations; judgment on arrearages; notice; security

A. In any proceeding in which there is at issue the
support of a child, the court may order either or both parents to pay any
amount necessary for the support of the child. If the court order
does not specify the date when current support begins, the support obligation
begins to accrue on the first day of the month following the entry of the
order.� If any form of payment is rightfully dishonored by the payor bank or
other drawee, any subsequent support payments and handling fees shall be paid
only by cash, money order, cashier's check, traveler's check or certified
check. The department may collect from the drawer of a dishonored
payment an amount allowed pursuant to section 44-6852.
Pursuant to sections 35-146 and 35-147,
The
department shall deposit
, pursuant to sections 35-146 and
35-147,
monies collected pursuant to this subsection in a child
support enforcement administration fund. If a party
that
is
required to pay support by guaranteed means demonstrates full and
timely payment for twenty-four consecutive months, that party may pay
support by regularly accepted forms of payment if these payments are for the
full amount, are timely tendered and are not rightfully dishonored by the payor
bank or other drawee. On a showing of good cause, the court may
order that the party or parties required to pay support give reasonable
security for these payments. If the court sets an appearance bond
and the obligor fails to appear, the bond is forfeited and credited against any
support owed by the party required to pay support.� This subsection does not
apply to payments that are made by means of a wage assignment.

B. On a showing that an income withholding order has
been ineffective to secure the timely payment of support and that an amount
equal to six months of current support has accrued, the court shall require the
obligor to give security, post bond or give some other guarantee to secure
overdue support.

C. In title IV-D cases, and in all other cases
subject to an income withholding order issued on or after January 1, 1994,
after notice to the party entitled to receive support, the department or its
agent may direct the party obligated to pay support or other payor to make
payment to the support payment clearinghouse. The department or its
agent shall provide notice by first class mail.

D. The obligation for current child support shall be
fully met before any payments under an order of assignment may be applied to
the payment of arrearages.� If a party is obligated to pay support for more
than one family and the amount available is not sufficient to meet the total
combined current support obligation, any monies shall be allocated to each
family as follows:

1. The amount of current support ordered in each
case shall be added to obtain the total support obligation.

2. The ordered amount in each case shall be divided
by the total support obligation to obtain a percentage of the total amount due.

3. The amount available from the obligor's income
shall be multiplied by the percentage under paragraph 2 of this subsection to
obtain the amount to be allocated to each family.

E. Any order for child support may be modified or
terminated on a showing of changed circumstance that is substantial and
continuing, except as to any amount that may have accrued as an arrearage
before the date of notice of the motion or order to show cause to modify or
terminate.� The addition of health insurance coverage as defined in section 25-531
or a change in the availability of health insurance coverage may constitute a
continuing and substantial change in circumstance. Modification and
termination are effective on the first day of the month following notice of the
petition for modification or termination unless the court, for good cause
shown, orders the change to become effective at a different date but not
earlier than the date of filing the petition for modification or
termination. The order of modification or termination may include an
award of attorney fees and court costs to the prevailing party.

F. On petition of a person who has been ordered to
pay child support pursuant to a presumption of paternity established pursuant
to section 25-814, the court may order the petitioner's support to
terminate if the court finds based on clear and convincing evidence that
paternity was established by fraud, duress or material mistake of fact
or if subsequent genetic testing affirms that the presumed father is
not the biological father of the child
.� Except for good cause shown,
the petitioner's support obligations continue in effect until the court has
ruled in favor of the petitioner.� The court shall order the petitioner, each
child who is the subject of the petition and the child's mother to submit to
genetic testing and shall order the appropriate testing procedures to determine
the child's inherited characteristics, including blood and tissue type.� If the
court finds that the petitioner is not the child's biological father, the court
shall vacate the determination of paternity and terminate the support obligation.�
Unless otherwise ordered by the court, an order vacating a support obligation
is prospective and does not alter the petitioner's obligation to pay child
support arrearages or any other amount previously ordered by the court.� If the
court finds that it is in the child's best interests, the court may order the
biological father to pay restitution to the petitioner for any child support
paid before the court ruled in favor of the petitioner pursuant to this
subsection.

G. Notwithstanding subsection E of this section, in
a title IV-D case a party, or the department or its agent if there is an
assignment of rights under section 46-407, may request every three years
that an order for child support be reviewed and, if appropriate,
adjusted. The request may be made without a specific showing of a
changed circumstance that is substantial and continuing. The department
or its agent shall conduct the review in accordance with the child support
guidelines of this state.� If appropriate, the department shall file a petition
in the superior court to adjust the support amount.� Every three years the
department or its agent shall notify the parties of their right to request a
review of the order for support. The department or its agent shall
notify the parties by first class mail at their last known address or by
including the notice in an order.

H. If a party in a title IV-D case requests a
review and adjustment sooner than three years, the party shall demonstrate a
changed circumstance that is substantial and continuing.

I. The right of a party entitled to receive support
or the department to receive child support payments as provided in the court
order vests as each installment falls due.� Each vested child support
installment is enforceable as a final judgment by operation of
law. The department or its agent or a party entitled to receive
support may also file a request for written judgment for support arrearages.

J. Voluntary relinquishment of physical custody of a
child to the obligor from the obligee is an affirmative defense in whole or in
part to a petition for enforcement of child support arrears.� In determining
whether the relinquishment was voluntary, the court shall consider whether
there is any evidence or history of any of the following:

1. Domestic violence.

2. Parental kidnapping.

3. Custodial interference.

K. The relinquishment pursuant to subsection J of
this section must have been for a time period in excess of any court-ordered
period of parenting time and the obligor must have supplied actual support for
the child.

L. If the obligee, the department or their agents
make efforts to collect a child support debt more than ten years after the
emancipation of the youngest child subject to the order, the obligor may assert
as a defense, and has the burden to prove, that the obligee or the department
unreasonably delayed in attempting to collect the child support debt.� On a
finding of unreasonable delay a tribunal, as defined in section 25-1202,
may determine that some or all of the child support debt is no longer collectible
after the date of the finding.

M. Notwithstanding any other law, any judgment for
support and for associated costs and attorney fees is exempt from renewal and
is enforceable until paid in full.

N. If a party entitled to receive child support or
spousal maintenance or the department or its agent enforcing an order of
support has not received court-ordered payments, the party entitled to receive
support or spousal maintenance or the department or its agent may file with the
clerk of the superior court a request for judgment of arrearages and an
affidavit indicating the name of the party obligated to pay support and the
amount of the arrearages.� The request must include notice of the requirements
of this section and the right to request a hearing within twenty days after
service in this state or within thirty days after service outside this state.�
The request, affidavit and notice must be served pursuant to the Arizona rules
of family law procedure on all parties
,
including the
department or its agents in title IV-D cases.� In a title IV-D
case, the department or its agent may serve all parties by certified mail,
return receipt requested.� Within twenty days after service in this state or
within thirty days after service outside this state, a party may file a request
for a hearing if the arrearage amount or the identity of the person is in
dispute.� If a hearing is not requested within the time provided, or if the
court finds that the objection is unfounded, the court must review the
affidavit and grant an appropriate judgment against the party obligated to pay
support.

O. If after reasonable efforts to locate the obligee
the clerk or support payment clearinghouse is unable to deliver payments for a
period of one hundred twenty days after the date the first payment is returned
as undeliverable due to the failure of a party to whom the support has been
ordered to be paid to notify the clerk or support payment clearinghouse of a
change in address, the clerk or support payment clearinghouse shall return that
and all other unassigned payments to the obligor unless there is an agreement
of the obligor to pay assigned arrears and other debts owed to the state.

P. If the obligee of a child support order marries
the obligor of the child support order, that order automatically terminates on
the last day of the month in which the marriage takes place and arrearages do
not accrue after that date.� However, the obligee or the state may collect
child support arrearages that accrued before that date.� The obligee, the
obligor or the department or its agent in a title IV-D case may file a
request or stipulation to terminate or adjust any existing order of assignment
pursuant to section 25-504 or 25-505.01.

Q. For the purposes of this chapter, a child is
emancipated:

1. On the date of the child's marriage.

2. On the child's eighteenth birthday.

3. When the child is adopted.

4. When the child dies.

5. On the termination of the support obligation if
support is extended beyond the age of majority pursuant to section 25-501,
subsection A or section 25-320, subsections E and F.
END_STATUTE

Sec. 2. Section 25-814, Arizona Revised
Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE
25-814.

Presumption of paternity; rebuttal; cessation of support
obligation

A. A man is presumed to be the father of
the

a
child if:

1. He and the mother of the child were married at
any time in the ten months immediately preceding the birth
of
the child
or the child is born within ten months after the marriage is
terminated by death, annulment, declaration of invalidity or dissolution of
marriage or after the court enters a decree of legal separation.

2. Genetic testing affirms at least a ninety-five

per cent

percent
probability of
paternity.

3. A birth certificate is signed by the mother and
father of a child born out of wedlock.

4. A notarized or witnessed statement is signed by
both parents acknowledging paternity or separate substantially similar
notarized or witnessed statements are signed by both parents acknowledging
paternity.

B. If another man is presumed to be the child's
father under subsection A, paragraph 1
of this section
,
an acknowledgment of paternity may be effected only with the written consent of
the presumed father or after the presumption is rebutted.� If the presumed
father has died or cannot reasonably be located, paternity may be established
without written consent.

C. Any presumption under this section shall be
rebutted by clear and convincing evidence. If two or more presumptions apply,
the presumption that the court determines, on the facts, is based on weightier
considerations of policy and logic will control. A court decree
establishing paternity of the child by another man rebuts the presumption.

D. If a man is presumed to be the
father of the child pursuant to subsection A of this section and subsequent
genetic testing affirms that the presumed father is not the biological father
of the child, the man is no longer presumed to be the father of the child and
is no longer responsible for any financial support obligations for the child
pursuant to chapter 5 of this title.

END_STATUTE