Back to California

AB-1139 • 2026

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: public access: nonmotorized recreation.

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: public access: nonmotorized recreation.

Education
Enacted

This bill passed the Legislature and reached final enactment based on the latest official action.

Sponsor
Rogers
Last action
2025-10-06
Official status
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 391, Statutes of 2025.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The official source does not specify the exact nature of 'minimal physical alterations' or provide a detailed list of what constitutes minimal improvements to the affected area.

California Environmental Quality Act: Exemption for Nonmotorized Recreation

AB-1139 extends an exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to county park agencies, allowing public access to existing roads and trails in areas used exclusively for nonmotorized recreation with minimal physical alterations.

What This Bill Does

  • Extends CEQA exemptions to county park agencies for changes that allow public access to preexisting paved and natural surface roads, trails, pathways, disturbed areas for vehicle parking, and rail lines converted into trails.
  • Requires lead agencies to adopt a natural resource management plan or equivalent document before approving the exemption.
  • Limits the exemption to projects involving minimal physical alterations and improvements to the affected area.
  • Requires lead agencies to ensure there is sufficient funding to implement the natural resource management plan.

Who It Names or Affects

  • County park agencies
  • Public users of parks and open spaces

Terms To Know

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
A law that requires government agencies to analyze the environmental impacts of their actions.
Lead agency
The government entity responsible for making decisions about a project or activity.

Limits and Unknowns

  • Does not apply where providing public access is reasonably foreseeable to have significant effects on the environment.
  • Requires substantial evidence that criteria are met before approving changes in use.

Bill History

  1. 2025-10-06 California Legislative Information

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 391, Statutes of 2025.

  2. 2025-10-06 California Legislative Information

    Approved by the Governor.

  3. 2025-09-04 California Legislative Information

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. 2025-08-28 California Legislative Information

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2763.).

  5. 2025-08-26 California Legislative Information

    In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. 2025-08-25 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2251.).

  7. 2025-08-20 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  8. 2025-08-19 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.

  9. 2025-07-16 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. 2025-07-07 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.

  11. 2025-07-03 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on N.R. & W. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 2).

  12. 2025-06-18 California Legislative Information

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  13. 2025-06-04 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and N.R. & W.

  14. 2025-05-23 California Legislative Information

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  15. 2025-05-23 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 0. Page 1656.)

  16. 2025-05-15 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. 2025-05-14 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).

  18. 2025-04-30 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. 2025-04-10 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on W. P., & W.

  20. 2025-04-09 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended.

  21. 2025-04-08 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on W. P., & W. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 7).

  22. 2025-03-10 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and W. P., & W.

  23. 2025-02-21 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  24. 2025-02-20 California Legislative Information

    Read first time. To print.

Official Summary Text

AB 1139, Rogers.
California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: public access: nonmotorized recreation.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment.
CEQA exempts from its requirements a change in use approved by a lead agency that is a park district or the Great Redwood Trail Agency to allow
public access to preexisting paved and natural surface roads, preexisting trails, preexisting pathways, preexisting disturbed areas for vehicle parking, as specified, and rail lines converted by the Great Redwood Trail Agency into trails known as the Great Redwood Trail, in areas used exclusively for nonmotorized recreation, if certain conditions are met, including that the change in use is consistent with a plan adopted by the park district or the Great Redwood Trail Agency, as applicable, and does not involve a physical alteration of the affected area. Existing law requires, before making a determination to approve or carry out a change in use that is determined to be exempt from CEQA, the lead agency to, among other things, make a finding that the above-described criteria are met. Existing law requires the lead
agency, if the lead agency determines that a change in use is not subject to CEQA pursuant to this exemption and determines to approve or carry out the activity, to file a notice with the State Clearinghouse in the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation and with the county clerk of the county in which the land is located, as provided.
This bill would extend the above exemption to a lead agency that is a county park agency. The bill would remove the condition that the change in use is consistent with a plan adopted by the park district or the Great Redwood Trail Agency, as applicable, and would instead require the lead agency, before making the exemption determination, to adopt a natural resource management plan, or equivalent document, that includes appropriate identification of resources and management strategies for the affected area, as specified. The bill would instead require,
as a condition of this exemption, that the change in use only involves minimal physical alterations and minimal improvements to the affected area, as specified. The bill would require the lead agency to make an additional finding that there is sufficient funding to implement the natural resource management plan, or equivalent document, and would require the finding, as well as the finding that the above-described criteria are met, to be based on substantial evidence. The bill would provide that its provisions do not apply where it is reasonably foreseeable that the provision of public access within a park or open space area will have a significant or cumulatively considerable effect on the environment. By imposing duties on public agencies related to the exemption, this bill would create a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain
costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF