Back to California

AB-1337 • 2026

Information Practices Act of 1977.

Information Practices Act of 1977.

Crime Education Healthcare Labor
Passed Legislature

This bill passed both chambers and reached final enrollment, even if later executive action is not shown here.

Sponsor
Ward
Last action
2025-07-15
Official status
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
Effective date
Not listed

Plain English Breakdown

The bill's status as 'Passed Legislature' is inconsistent with its last action being 'Failed passage.'

Information Practices Act of 1977

This act updates and removes exemptions from California's Information Practices Act, affecting local public agencies and personal information handling rules.

What This Bill Does

  • Removes the exemption that allows local public agencies to avoid following the rules set by the Information Practices Act.
  • Expands what is considered 'personal information' under the act.
  • Requires agency rules about handling personal information to follow state guidelines.
  • Prohibits using personal information for purposes other than those it was collected for, unless allowed by law.
  • Changes when local agencies can disclose personal information that could identify individuals.
  • Makes negligent violations of the act a cause for discipline.

Who It Names or Affects

  • Local public agencies in California
  • People whose personal information is stored or used by these agencies

Terms To Know

Personal Information
Information that can be linked to a specific person, like their name or Social Security number.
Local Public Agencies
Counties, cities, school districts, and other local government bodies in California.

Limits and Unknowns

  • The bill did not pass the legislature as of July 15, 2025.
  • It is unclear when or if it will be signed into law by the governor.
  • Local agencies may need to adjust their practices and rules to comply with new requirements.

Bill History

  1. 2025-07-15 California Legislative Information

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  2. 2025-06-11 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

  3. 2025-06-03 California Legislative Information

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  4. 2025-06-02 California Legislative Information

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 64. Noes 0. Page 1921.)

  5. 2025-05-27 California Legislative Information

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  6. 2025-05-23 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  7. 2025-05-23 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (May 23).

  8. 2025-05-23 California Legislative Information

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 51. Noes 16. Page 1644.)

  9. 2025-04-30 California Legislative Information

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.

  10. 2025-04-09 California Legislative Information

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. 2025-04-08 California Legislative Information

    Read second time and amended.

  12. 2025-04-07 California Legislative Information

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 1).

  13. 2025-03-17 California Legislative Information

    Referred to Com. on P. & C.P.

  14. 2025-02-24 California Legislative Information

    Read first time.

  15. 2025-02-22 California Legislative Information

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

  16. 2025-02-21 California Legislative Information

    Introduced. To print.

Official Summary Text

AB 1337, as amended, Ward.
Information Practices Act of 1977.
Existing law, the Information Practices Act of 1977, prescribes a set of requirements, prohibitions, and remedies applicable to agencies, as defined, with regard to their collection, storage, and disclosure of personal information, as defined. Existing law exempts from the provisions of the act counties, cities, any city and county, school districts, municipal corporations, districts, political subdivisions, and other local public agencies, as specified.
This bill would recast those provisions to, among other things, remove that exemption for local agencies, and would revise and expand the definition of “personal information.” The bill would make other technical, nonsubstantive, and conforming changes. Because the bill would expand the duties of local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law requires an agency to establish rules of conduct for persons involved in the design, development, operation, disclosure, or maintenance of records containing personal information and instruct those persons with respect to specified rules relevant to the act.
This bill would
require that those rules established by the agency be consistent with applicable provisions of the State Administrative Manual and the State Information Management Manual. The bill would
prohibit an agency from using records containing personal information for any purpose or purposes other than the purpose or purposes for which that personal information was collected, except as required
or authorized
by state
or federal
law.
Existing law prohibits an agency from disclosing any personal information in a manner that would link the information disclosed to the individual to whom it pertains, except under specified circumstances.
This bill would revise the circumstances that may allow the disclosure of personal information in a manner that could link the information disclosed to the individual to whom it pertains, and would make conforming changes.
Existing law makes an intentional violation of any provision of the act, or of any rules or regulations adopted under the act, by an officer or employee of any agency a cause for discipline, including termination of employment.
This bill would also make a negligent violation of the act a cause for discipline.
Existing law provides that the intentional
disclosure of medical, psychiatric, or psychological information in violation of the disclosure provisions of the act, that is not otherwise permitted by law, is punishable as a misdemeanor if the wrongful disclosure results in economic loss or personal injury to the individual to whom the information pertains.
This bill would remove the requirement that the wrongful disclosure result in economic loss or personal injury. Because the bill would expand the scope of an existing crime by deleting this condition, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill
would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Current Bill Text

Read the full stored bill text
Download Bill PDF